The point of this service is fast handoff of one GPU between applications. It grew up
around the two on this box, and their names ended up compiled into process matching,
VRAM attribution, busy detection and release calls alike -- about 385 references
across five modules. That made it a script for Ollama and ComfyUI rather than a GPU
arbitrator.
tenants.py describes an application as data: how to recognise its processes, how to
tell whether it is genuinely working, how to ask it for VRAM back, and how much it
matters when two want the card. Ollama, ComfyUI and the desktop compositor ship as
defaults in tenants.json, so behaviour is unchanged, but the arbitration logic no
longer knows any particular name. Endpoints are generic: GET /api/tenants,
GET /api/tenants/{name}, POST /api/tenants/{name}/release -- the last being the
general form of both the Ollama soft-yield and the ComfyUI purge.
Verified by registering a third application on this machine with no code change: the
speech relay that had been showing up only as anonymous "unmanaged VRAM" is now named,
attributed, and probed by the VRAM it holds rather than by an API it does not have.
Because it declares no release strategy, a release request returns 409 explaining that
its memory cannot be reclaimed, instead of reporting a success that did nothing.
Busy probes deliberately cannot use GPU utilisation. It is shared by every tenant, so
it cannot attribute work to one of them -- the mistake that made a stale ComfyUI queue
entry undetectable earlier in this branch. A tenant's own VRAM is the signal.
Writing the tests exposed that the suite had become non-hermetic: classification is now
configuration, so a test asserting "a third-party process is unmanaged" started failing
the moment the speech relay was registered on this machine. An autouse fixture now
isolates every test from the operator's live tenants.json.
Tests: 231 (was 206).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Tests. First automated coverage for the project: 164 tests, 2.7s, no GPU or network.
An autouse fixture stubs overclock_manager._sh -- the single choke point for every
nvidia-smi/nvidia-settings write -- so no test can mutate the card. They deliberately
pin the empirically measured constants that would otherwise rot silently: the cold and
warm load figures behind the cache-hit thresholds, the warm_confident residency rule,
and the busy/stalled yield split. One test asserts RAM_HIT_GBPS stays at or below the
measured 2.63 GB/s warm load, so the old physically unreachable 5.0 GB/s bar cannot
come back.
Three bugs the suite surfaced, now fixed:
- autotune._subsample(values, 1) divided by zero; the early return only covered
len(values) <= max_steps.
- telemetry_store.stop() flushed its local pending list but never drained the queue,
silently losing rows submitted just before a shutdown -- exactly when the last
events matter.
- ram_optimizer.page_residency's zero-byte short-circuit omitted keys every other
return path provides, so a 0-byte file was planned for warming.
Reclaim. The README has claimed bidirectional arbitration from the start, but only one
direction was ever automatic. Establishing what actually happens took a controlled test
with the service stopped: with ComfyUI holding 6.83 GB, Ollama does not spill to the CPU
on this box -- it aborts with "cudaMalloc failed: out of memory", because n_gpu_layers is
pinned to 99 and it will not reduce the layer count. So both failure modes are handled:
_check_ollama_starved watches size_vram < size for the default configuration where Ollama
does spill, and switch_ollama_model catches the hard OOM, reclaims VRAM from an idle
ComfyUI and retries once. The request that returned HTTP 500 from Ollama directly now
succeeds through HyperSwap, loading at 3.85 GB/s after reclaiming 6.83 GB.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
