4926 lines
266 KiB
Markdown
4926 lines
266 KiB
Markdown
# US Passport - RFID biometric
|
||
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
ABSTRACT OF CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS
|
||
FOR THE INTEGRATION
|
||
OF CONTACTLESS CHIP IN THE U.S.
|
||
PASSPORT
|
||
Abstract of
|
||
Document Version
|
||
2.0
|
||
26 April, 2004
|
||
1
|
||
|
||
Table of Contents
|
||
1.1 Introduction: 3
|
||
1.2 Background: 3
|
||
1.3 Summary of the TDIS Passport Issuance Process 4
|
||
1.4 The Contactless Chip 5
|
||
1.4.1 Data to be Stored on the Chip 5
|
||
1.5 The Passport Document 6
|
||
1.6 The Impact Upon GPO EP Book Assembly 7
|
||
1.7 The Impact on the TDIS Passport Issuance Process 8
|
||
1.7.1 Toppan Printer Changes: 8
|
||
1.7.2 Internal Controls 8
|
||
1.8 Impact of Electronic Passport on Amendments and Endorsements 8
|
||
1.8.1 Passport Amendments: 8
|
||
1.8.2 Passport Endorsements: 9
|
||
1.9 Impact of Mailing of Issued Chip Passports to Customers 9
|
||
1.10 The Use of the Chip Passport 9
|
||
1.11 The Use of PKI Light Technology to Secure Data on the Chip 10
|
||
1.12 Software Development 10
|
||
1.12.1 New Critical Requirements 10
|
||
1.12.2 Process Integration Points 10
|
||
1.12.3 Travel Document Issuance System Software Development Areas 12
|
||
2
|
||
|
||
ABSTRACT CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE INTEGRATION
|
||
OF CONTACTLESS CHIP IN THE U.S. PASSPORT
|
||
Version 2.0
|
||
April 26, 2004
|
||
1.1 Introduction:
|
||
The Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs (DOS/CA), in cooperation with
|
||
its partners at the United States Government Printing Office (GPO) and the
|
||
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), plans to implement a new version of the
|
||
United States passport that will contain an embedded Integrated Circuit (IC)
|
||
contactless chip. The chip will be used to store additional data on the passport that
|
||
cannot be stored in the conventional OCR-B machine-readable zone. The new
|
||
technology will enhance the security of the passport and will facilitate the movement
|
||
of travelers at ports of entry. Initially, the new passport will be issued on a limited
|
||
scale in late 2004 or early 2005. All newly issued full-validity United States passports
|
||
are expected to have embedded chips by the end of calendar 2005. This document
|
||
describes the concept of operations to integrate a chip in the passport and use of that
|
||
document at ports of entry.
|
||
1.2 Background:
|
||
Section 303 of the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002
|
||
(Enhanced Border Security Act) requires that nations whose citizens are allowed to
|
||
enter the US under the provisions of the Visa Waiver Program must have a program in
|
||
place by October 26, 2004 to “incorporate biometric and document authentication
|
||
identifiers that comply with applicable biometric and document identification
|
||
standards established by the International Civil Aviation Organization.”
|
||
The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), through a series of meetings
|
||
during the last two years, has developed a set of specifications that involve the
|
||
inclusion of an electronic chip in passports to which would be written both the facial
|
||
image and biographic data of the bearer. This is the same data currently found on the
|
||
data page of a passport.
|
||
Including IC chips in passports could provide the border inspection community with a
|
||
tool that could have significant security benefits and could speed the movement of
|
||
travelers through border inspection processes.
|
||
While the United States is not mandated to comply with the requirements of section
|
||
303 of the Enhanced Border Security Act, it appears desirable for the U.S. to commit
|
||
to a comprehensive program to incorporate this new technology into the U.S.
|
||
passport. Doing so will:
|
||
• Ensure the continued international acceptability and interoperability of
|
||
the U.S. passports;
|
||
• Recognize that VWP participant states, which will be required to
|
||
change their passports for travel by their nationals to the US, will be
|
||
likely to impose reciprocal requirements on Americans traveling to
|
||
their nation;
|
||
• Improve the security of the US passport and help strengthen U.S.
|
||
border security by allowing the Department of Homeland Security to
|
||
focus its efforts on travelers (Americans and otherwise) with less
|
||
secure travel documents.
|
||
3
|
||
|
||
Consistent with principles of international reciprocity, the United States intends to
|
||
adhere to these same requirements. Therefore, the United States’ electronic passport
|
||
will be designed to comply with the specifications of ICAO Document 9303, Part I
|
||
and its technical reports and annexes relating to advanced storage media for use in
|
||
passports. As such, the passport will include a full digital image of the passport
|
||
bearer stored on an IC chip and will incorporate the use of the ICAO Logical Data
|
||
Structure which prescribes the placement of data on the chip. The data stored on the
|
||
chip will be secured with a digital signature using a light version of PKI technology as
|
||
prescribed by ICAO.
|
||
The Under-Secretary of State for Management has authorized DOS/CA to pursue the
|
||
concept of integrating a contactless chip in the United States passport and to comply
|
||
with ICAO requirements regarding the use of this advanced storage medium to store a
|
||
digital, biometric full facial image along with currently captured bio-data onboard the
|
||
chip.
|
||
1.3 Summary of the TDIS Passport Issuance Process
|
||
The Travel Document Issuance System-PhotoDig (TDIS-PD) was developed for the primary
|
||
purpose of increasing the physical security of the U.S. passport and improving the issuance
|
||
process. TDIS-PD provides the capability to digitally scan passport photographs and to
|
||
digitally print images of photographs in passports. Each of the sixteen passport issuance
|
||
locations has its own TDIS-PD system that is based upon local area network PC technology
|
||
and automates, to a great extent, many of the previously manual production functions. The
|
||
local agency systems are linked via a Wide Area Network capability. The introduction of the
|
||
steps necessary to personalize the new electronic passport should minimize changes to the
|
||
TDIS-PD system to the extent possible.
|
||
The processing flow for a passport application depends on how the application enters
|
||
the production system. Applications are identified as Lockbox, Mail-in, or Counter
|
||
applications. There are eight processing stations; each application must be processed
|
||
through some or all of the stations.
|
||
Mail-in applications are processed at every station. Counter applications are not
|
||
processed through Mail Open or cashier. Instead, for Counter applications, these two
|
||
functions are combined into Counter Cashier. Other than this slight difference, Mail-
|
||
in and Counter applications follow the same processing flow. Lockbox applications
|
||
are initially handled by an independent contractor, and therefore skip Cashier and
|
||
Data Entry. Image Capture is combined with Lockbox/Mail Open function for
|
||
Lockbox applications. The figure below provides a diagram of the three processing
|
||
flows.
|
||
4
|
||
|
||
1.4 The Contactless Chip
|
||
ICAO has specified the use of contactless chips as the advanced storage medium, for
|
||
use in passports, for storing additional information (including a digital photo and
|
||
related biometrics images of the applicant). The chip and its antenna array will reside
|
||
on the passport. The chip will be ISO/IEC 14443, part 1 – 2 compliant, Type A or B
|
||
with a minimum storage capability of 64 kilobytes. The microprocessor will be
|
||
ISO/IEC 7816-4 compliant and will require specific command sets to communicate
|
||
with a chip reader. The data stored on the chip will follow the file structure
|
||
prescribed by ICAO in its Logical Data Structure (LDS) for use with Machine-
|
||
Readable Travel Documents. Despite the type of chip and array selected, it is
|
||
essential that all operations of the microprocessor and the antenna array are
|
||
compatible and can be read with chip readers at ports of entry.
|
||
The chip will have the ability to store large amounts of data, minimum of 64
|
||
kilobytes, including a digital facial image of the bearer’s photograph. Each chip will
|
||
have its own unique control number that can be used to associate the chip with the
|
||
passport document.
|
||
In order to be read on a globally interoperable basis, ICAO identified the chip
|
||
command sets and related specifications necessary to ensure that all chips can be read
|
||
by all readers that will be used at international borders.
|
||
1.4.1 Data to be Stored on the Chip
|
||
The data stored on the IC chip will include all of the data currently stored in the
|
||
Machine Readable Zone (MRZ) of the passport, as well as a full digital facial image
|
||
of the bearer and the passport application number. Following digital signing of the
|
||
data to be written to the chip, the digital signature will also be written to the chip. The
|
||
data records to be stored in the chip will be stored in the format and structure as
|
||
prescribed in the Technical Report on the LDS as prescribed by ICAO. Conformance
|
||
to the LDS specifications will ensure global interoperability to read the document and
|
||
will maximize download speeds when reading data from the chip.
|
||
5
|
||
|
||
The data elements from the Visual Zone and MRZ portion of the data page that will
|
||
be stored on the chip include:
|
||
• The document code (e.g. “P” for passport)
|
||
• The Issuing State
|
||
• Name of the Bearer
|
||
• Passport Number
|
||
• Date of Birth
|
||
• Sex
|
||
• Date of Expiry
|
||
• Place of Birth
|
||
• Date of Issue
|
||
• Issuing Authority
|
||
• Check Sum
|
||
• Passport Application Number
|
||
• Full digital image of the passport photograph
|
||
A facial recognition template of the facial image will not be stored on the chip at this
|
||
time. Passport endorsements that are printed in the back of the passport will not be
|
||
stored on the chip.
|
||
1.5 The Passport Document
|
||
There are two aspects to the new electronic passport book design: configuration of the
|
||
document structure sufficient to support the inclusion of a contactless chip/antenna
|
||
array and incorporation of new physical security re-design of the document. Although
|
||
there is some cross-over, it is important to note that the integration of a chip array in
|
||
the passport is the primary objective of this project, while the re-design of the passport
|
||
artwork and physical security features are desirable but not critical objectives. It is
|
||
desirable that the re-design of the passport be completed concurrently with chip
|
||
integration to provide added security enhancements to the passport and to physically
|
||
distinguish between the new chip passport and the current conventional design. The
|
||
re-design of the passport and addition of new security features and a new tint pattern
|
||
(American Icon Series) will only occur if they do not interfere with the goal of
|
||
integrating a chip in the passport. A functional requirements document will specify
|
||
the features of the physical security re-design of the document.
|
||
• The Government Printing Office (GPO) will continue to manufacture the
|
||
passport book.
|
||
• The chip/antenna array will be inserted in the inside back cover by GPO.
|
||
Alternative locations of a free-standing plastic card sewn into the book, and
|
||
insertion in the middle pages of the book will be considered only if no way is
|
||
found to protect the chip in the back cover.
|
||
• The Toppan printer will still be used
|
||
• Personalization of the passport will be performed at the TDIS Quality Control
|
||
station vice the Toppan printer.
|
||
• The chip passport must function over its ten-year validity.
|
||
• The passport book inventory control number will now also serve as the
|
||
passport number.
|
||
The passport will retain its present configuration with a paste-down end sheet, binding
|
||
strip and coated cloth cover with a minimum of 24 or 48 pages. The data page is
|
||
currently on the inside front cover. GPO plate layout dictates a preference for a 24/48
|
||
page basic book. There is room in the present UNO binding machine for an
|
||
additional page to be inserted if needed by either chip insertion or design
|
||
considerations. As part of the passport re-design, an effort will be made to relocate
|
||
the passport data page from its current location on the inside front cover, to the first
|
||
6
|
||
|
||
separate page of the passport. This change will permit the book to be expanded to a
|
||
28 or 52 page document.
|
||
Chip structure is the unknown that will affect document design. Chip inlays can be
|
||
incorporated into the back cover in a number of ways: sewing in a flexible/durable
|
||
plastic sheet between the end leaf and cover; pre-gluing to either the inside back cover
|
||
or the inside back end leaf; incorporation into or on an enlarged binding strip, or by
|
||
being incorporated into the cover at manufacture. The physical size of the chip, in
|
||
particular thickness, the location of the chip in the back cover and the size and
|
||
orientation of its antenna are other major factors. Adhesive strength and durability
|
||
will play a major role in the success of the chip passport. Information and testing of
|
||
these concepts will be required.
|
||
The ability of the embedded chip array to remain functional over the useful life of the
|
||
passport is crucial to the performance of the document. The National Institute of
|
||
Standards and Technology (NIST) has been employed to conduct durability tests.
|
||
Two aspects to testing:, what abuse is done, and how to measure the degradation as a
|
||
result of the abuse test, will form the basis for testing the documents. .
|
||
A second class of abuse, that of intentional damage or resistance to fraud attack, has
|
||
no written test methods. The resultant chips in books will be subject to every
|
||
physical, chemical, thermal and electronic attack that can be developed.
|
||
Durability, chip structure and physical location of the array must be confirmed and
|
||
resolved through this testing.
|
||
1.6 The Impact Upon GPO EP Book Assembly
|
||
GPO will fabricate the passports and provide them to the DOS for personalization.
|
||
The integration of a chip in the passport will change GPO production and control
|
||
operations. It will be imperative to determine the mechanical changes to the GPO
|
||
book binding operations. It is imperative that GPO investigates alternative adhesives
|
||
that are water-insoluble and are capable of forming permanent bonds between paper,
|
||
cloth and various types of plastic.
|
||
Incoming chips will have to be checked to determine that they are operational chips
|
||
and not damaged on arrival at GPO. Outgoing chip-enabled passports will have to be
|
||
checked to ensure that each book contains an operational chip unharmed by the
|
||
process of inclusion in the passport. At this point, it may be possible to realize stock
|
||
control, inventory, and counting functions not possible with chipless books.
|
||
For some time, GPO will be required to produce current passports for DOS/CA in
|
||
addition to passports with chip inlays. GPO will balance production to meet the
|
||
required production demands for each type of book as the transition to the new
|
||
passport and from the current document occurs.
|
||
Regardless of the chip inlay structure, all waste must be disintegrated and the chip
|
||
destroyed. The use of current disintegrators at passport agencies will be sufficient to
|
||
destroy the chip, either by crushing it or tearing the antenna structure to pieces. In
|
||
any event nothing usable must survive. The reference to incineration, the chip is
|
||
silicon, which will not burn, but the chips electronic properties will be destroyed in
|
||
fire. The antenna will likely be comprised of aluminum or copper. Neither metal will
|
||
be employed in recoverable quantities. It is expected that the EP Book Cover vendor
|
||
will specify appropriate destruction and disposal methods should the current process
|
||
be unusable for potential security or safety reasons.
|
||
7
|
||
|
||
1.7 The Impact on the TDIS Passport Issuance Process
|
||
The new chip passport business processes will remain similar to our current processes
|
||
but some changes will be needed. CA plans that:
|
||
(cid:131) All domestic passport-issuing facilities will continue to:
|
||
o Receive blank passports from the Government Printing office;
|
||
o Use Toppan printers;
|
||
o Test the MRZ zone of the personalized passport
|
||
(cid:131) All domestic passport-issuing facilities will be capable of:
|
||
o Loading bio-data and facial image on the IC chip;
|
||
o Personalize the passport at the Quality Control Station
|
||
o Having the data on the chip digitally signed via link to a signing
|
||
authority;
|
||
o Testing and reading the bio data and image on the loaded RF chip.
|
||
With minor exceptions possibly in fee handling and recording and the quality control
|
||
function, implementation of the chip passport should not change the passport issuance
|
||
processing steps at mail open, data entry, cashiering, scanning/image capture, image
|
||
review, and name check. At some point in the future, when chip books are returned to
|
||
passport agencies for replacement, passport specialists processing replacement
|
||
passport cases should be provided with chip readers to validate the data and image
|
||
stored on previously issued intelligent passports as part of the adjudication process.
|
||
The software design for writing data to the chip at QC must prevent de-linking of the
|
||
physical and electronic data sets on any particular book, (e.g. the electronic data does
|
||
not match the printed data). It is possible that proper linking could be verified and
|
||
assured in an automated, electronic way that will ensure production quality and will
|
||
assist the QC operator. Writing to the chip at QC will require a redesign of the QC
|
||
workstation and processing steps to implement the chip write/read process while
|
||
ensuring best practices and efficiency of the function.
|
||
1.7.1 Toppan Printer Changes:
|
||
DOS/CA requires that the current passport personalization process change as little as
|
||
possible. Nevertheless, the addition thickness to the passport book resulting from the
|
||
addition of a chip inlay and the relocation of the data page to the first separate page of
|
||
the passport will require some adjustments to the Toppan printer. Also, the re-design
|
||
of the passport to include a new tint pattern (American Icon Series) will require
|
||
evaluation of the edge detection sensor on the printer.
|
||
1.7.2 Internal Controls
|
||
The chip passport can offer additional ways to safeguard blank passports by using the
|
||
RFID technology. The Government Printing Office (GPO) will associate the chip
|
||
serial number to the passport inventory control number during the book fabrication
|
||
process. This will facilitate use of the chip technology to account for passports during
|
||
various internal control processes. Furthermore, the chip should facilitate registering
|
||
books to agency inventories, distributing books to book print, returning books to
|
||
inventory, and in accounting for the destruction of spoiled books. These internal
|
||
controls options will be evaluated during this project.
|
||
1.8 Impact of Electronic Passport on Amendments and Endorsements
|
||
The implementation of the chip passport will directly affect the policy and methods
|
||
for amending passports and providing passport endorsements that limit or explain the
|
||
use of the passport.
|
||
1.8.1 Passport Amendments:
|
||
8
|
||
|
||
A decision has been made that chip passports will not be amended, at least for the
|
||
beginning of the project. New passports will be issued in cases requiring amendments
|
||
of previously issued passports.
|
||
1.8.2 Passport Endorsements:
|
||
Passport endorsements are often written on the back inside cover of the passport to
|
||
notify the border control authorities of an individual’s reason for travel. With the chip
|
||
passport, endorsements will continue to be printed, particularly for the benefit of
|
||
border control authorities who will need to visually observe the endorsements. The
|
||
passport with the chip embedded in the back cover may preclude the ability to write
|
||
endorsements in that location. This will have to be evaluated. If printing on the back
|
||
cover is not feasible, PPT may need to rethink the positioning of written
|
||
endorsements. Since most immigration officers are accustomed to looking in the back
|
||
of the passport for endorsements, endorsements could be placed as close to the back
|
||
of the book as possible. Although endorsements will continue to be printed in the
|
||
U.S. passport, endorsement data will not be written to the chip.
|
||
1.9 Impact of Mailing of Issued Chip Passports to Customers
|
||
It has been recently alleged that the irradiation systems (E Beams) used by the United
|
||
States Postal Service (USPS) might have a severe and negative effect on IC chips.
|
||
Any chip coming into contact with the E beam may be destroyed. DOS/CA will need
|
||
to investigate this issue and will possibly need to change its mailing policy for
|
||
customers in the metropolitan Washington area and any other area where USPS
|
||
employs this system. DOS/CA must evaluate the possibility that the USPS sorting
|
||
machines may cause undue damage to the IC passport. DOS/CA may need to change
|
||
the size of its mailing envelopes to ensure that they by-pass the mechanical mail
|
||
sorters or are hand sorted. DOS/CA must also evaluate the additional weight of the
|
||
chip inlays in the book in order to project possible increases in mailing costs.
|
||
DOS/CA will evaluate the need to protect the books during mailing (possibly by
|
||
lining the envelopes with foil) to protect the chip from malicious “skimming” of
|
||
personal data through the envelope
|
||
1.10 The Use of the Chip Passport
|
||
The chip passport will be read at United States borders as well as foreign ports of
|
||
entry. Currently, document readers at ports-of-entry capture the biographical
|
||
information (e.g., last name, first name, middle initial, date-of-birth, nationality,
|
||
gender, document number) contained on the machine-readable zone of travel
|
||
documents or that data is keyed-in manually. With the deployment of chip-embedded
|
||
documents, passport book readers should have the capability to read all of the
|
||
biographical data contained in the machine-readable zone and the biographical and
|
||
biometric data contained in the contactless chip. The concurrent reading of data from
|
||
the MRZ and the contactless chip would allow the inspector to retrieve this
|
||
information one time, thereby reducing the time necessary for separate read
|
||
transactions. Border inspection processes might also wish to procure full-page
|
||
readers that perform bit-map comparisons of data pages that will also conduct reads of
|
||
the MRZ and the contactless chip concurrently. It is anticipated that the U.S. passport
|
||
will utilize passive authentication and open access to reading the data on the chip. It
|
||
is anticipated that with the rollout of chip passports, the passport book reader
|
||
community will respond to the marketplace demands for hardware that will meet
|
||
these purposes.
|
||
Because the Enhanced Border Security Act requires U.S. Visa Waiver Program
|
||
countries to comply with ICAO requirements to have passports that contain a full
|
||
digital image of the face, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will have to
|
||
read the facial image contained on the chip in the United States passport and conduct
|
||
facial recognition matching with the live image of the bearer of the passport.
|
||
9
|
||
|
||
Although this scenario is yet-to-be-determined by DHS, it will probably require one-
|
||
one matching of the facial image with bearer with the stored photo and one-few
|
||
matching against a DHS watch list. DOS/CA should work with DHS to test the
|
||
reading and facial recognition matching of the image contained in the chip and ensure
|
||
that the U.S. passport can be read and facial images matched as optimally as possible
|
||
by DHS.
|
||
The EP will also need to endure the physical abuse that the document might receive in
|
||
the use of the document by border inspectors. Specifically, the hand stamping of
|
||
entry/exit stamps in the passport must be considered a threat to the durability of the
|
||
chip. DOS/CA will conduct durability testing on the document. Because some
|
||
passports seen at borders will contain chips and others will not, an international
|
||
symbolic identifier that will permit the bearer to know that he/she has a chip passport
|
||
will be necessary. It is belivied that, particularly in the transition to the new chip
|
||
documents, bearers might be directed to specific inspection lanes that are set up for
|
||
the reading of chip passports by the use of this international symbol.
|
||
1.11 The Use of PKI Light Technology to Secure Data on the Chip
|
||
ICAO has specified that the data loaded to IC passports must be digitally signed for
|
||
protection from alteration and abuse. This means that a private key must be used to
|
||
sign the data and a public key is used to decrypt the data. ICAO has also suggested
|
||
that the distribution of public keys used by all countries can be best managed by
|
||
sending all public keys to ICAO, where they can be pulled down from an ICAO
|
||
server designated for that purpose.
|
||
Prior to the issuance of a passport, each passport issuance location will prepare the
|
||
data that needs to be digitally signed. That data message will be transmitted in an
|
||
encrypted state to the Certificate Authority in Washington. The data will be hashed,
|
||
signed and returned to the issuance agency in an encrypted packet. A code
|
||
corresponding to the public key needed to read the data will be sent with the signed
|
||
data. Appropriate internal controls information regarding the signed data including
|
||
the date/time of signature, etc, will have to be maintained on the CA Server. The
|
||
actual signed data can reside on the agency database for a reasonable period of time to
|
||
facilitate re-issues. Data needed for re-writes will require a new digital signature.
|
||
The signed data message will not be permanently archived to PIERS. Instead, only
|
||
the unsigned issuance data and the code for the corresponding public key will be
|
||
archived onto PIERS.
|
||
1.12 Software Development
|
||
Software development will be required to the current passport issuance system (TDIS)
|
||
in order to integrate the new production and issuance control functions associated
|
||
with the chip passport. Changes to the existing TDIS infrastructure will be preserved
|
||
to the extent possible in order to meet the project deadline and to minimize costs.
|
||
1.12.1 New Critical Requirements
|
||
• Systems must continue to support application processing and passport issuance
|
||
of the new passport while pursuing productivity improvements
|
||
• Systems must support personalization and management of IC Embedded
|
||
Passports with high levels of security and data integrity
|
||
• Systems must support 24x7 service levels as passport data will be integral to
|
||
DHS entry/exit solutions
|
||
• Systems developed should support open, standards-based technology and
|
||
avoid proprietary approaches where possible (ref. ICAO/NTWG)
|
||
1.12.2 Process Integration Points
|
||
10
|
||
|
||
Supporting an IC Enabled Passport will lead to system changes in the Travel
|
||
Document Issuance System (TDIS) as well as accompanying systems (PIERS,
|
||
PRISM, MIS, PLOTS). For example, TDIS will need to change to support biometric
|
||
related processes including:
|
||
• Enrolment
|
||
• Template Creation
|
||
• Identification
|
||
• Verification
|
||
The diagram below illustrates some potential process changes that will lead to system
|
||
changes.
|
||
11
|
||
|
||
Applicant Applies for Passport Do forms need changes based on
|
||
Should archived PRISM Customs, INS, DHS data needs?
|
||
images be enrolled in FR
|
||
db? If so, what is an Application Do forms need more boxes to allow
|
||
acceptable matching rate? Method? for ICR/OCR capabilities?
|
||
Should photo standards be more
|
||
stringent to ensure more accurate
|
||
recognition once in FR db?
|
||
App Mailed to Agency
|
||
Does LB need App at Mellon App Directly at Counter D sc o a n a n g e e r n s c t y o c o en u s n u te re rs t h n a e t e p d h d o e t s o k c an
|
||
changes to allow be enrolled if in expedite conditions?
|
||
for rejection of Receive at Receive Receive at
|
||
photo? Mellon Standard Mail Counter Should a Live Capture station be an
|
||
option if photo needs to be redone
|
||
and time is an issue?
|
||
Post Funds Open Mail Cashier
|
||
Should NT finger print authentication
|
||
be added to increase security in
|
||
accessing cash drawers?
|
||
Image Capture Cashier at
|
||
Counter
|
||
What system steps need to be added
|
||
behind the sceens to enroll photo
|
||
into FR db?
|
||
What steps need to be added to
|
||
Image Review validate enrollement, and to allow user
|
||
to enroll manually if errors occur?
|
||
Do Customs, INS, and DHS require any
|
||
Enter Data additional data to be entered?
|
||
Should a check of the FR db be added
|
||
in the future? How should one to one
|
||
Conduct matches and one to many matches be
|
||
NameCheck handled?
|
||
How will adjudication be affected if FR
|
||
Adjudicate db hits need to be reviewed?
|
||
Print Book Should the printer be modified to
|
||
include chip writing capability? Does
|
||
QC need to be re-written to ensure
|
||
that chip has been written to correctly?
|
||
How do changes in the ppt book affect
|
||
Should we verify that the the printer/qc modules?
|
||
m sp e o c i h le a d n i b s o m o u k s s e w d o to rk d s e w s i t t r h o y Control Quality of Book Do we need to save a copy of what is
|
||
the chip? written to the chip in the db?
|
||
Do we need a way to handle
|
||
destroying a chip and rejections/spoils
|
||
of book?
|
||
Should the policy change so that
|
||
ammendments and endorsements
|
||
require a new book (if chip can only be
|
||
written to once, how do updates
|
||
Do we need to consider PO occur?)
|
||
handling of book (durability of Deliver Book to
|
||
book, exposure to ... Applicant How should renewals that contain
|
||
amendments be handled?
|
||
Diagram 1: TDIS Process Flow with Biometric Integration Points
|
||
1.12.3 Travel Document Issuance System Software Development Areas
|
||
Travel Document Issuance System:
|
||
Preliminary review of the process integration points illustrated above, along with
|
||
assessment of the information and data needs, leads to an early indication of the
|
||
functionality necessary to support issuance of an IC Enabled Passport. Initial
|
||
application elements to consider for software development include:
|
||
• Photo scanning and assessment (for suitability)
|
||
• Photo enrollment
|
||
• Photo matching (verification)
|
||
12
|
||
|
||
• Photo matching (identification)
|
||
• Logical Data Structure (LDS) Preparation
|
||
• CRC and PKI generation and assignment
|
||
• LDS Writing
|
||
• LDS Verification
|
||
13
|
||
|
||
APPENDIX B EP Book Cover Material Specification
|
||
B.1 Specifications for Property 20678-4
|
||
Blue Woven Cloth Material for U.S. Passports
|
||
General Requirements
|
||
Suitable for use as a cover for U.S. passports; able to accept heat stamping of
|
||
imitation gold foil; running on the Uno automatic binding line. Stock will be used in
|
||
air-conditioned pressroom maintained at 24 ±2 oC and 45 ±8 percent relative humidity
|
||
Specific Requirements
|
||
PROPERTY REQUIREMENT METHOD
|
||
Composition Shall be 100% cotton fabric coated with pyroxylin, Mfg'r's technical data
|
||
acrylic, polyurethane, or other non-migratory resin sheet / spectroscopy /
|
||
Method A
|
||
Thickness Average, inch (±10%) 0.014 ASTM D1777
|
||
(mm) (0.35)
|
||
Weave Drill 2 / 1 Method A
|
||
Weight Average finish cloth, oz/yd2 (g/m2) ±10% 10 (340) T-410
|
||
Minimum base cloth, oz/yd2 (g/m2) 5 (170)
|
||
Thread count Per in2 (cm2) 100 (40) ASTM D3775
|
||
Breaking Minimum Warp / Filling, lb/in 80 / 50
|
||
strength (kN/m) (14 / 8.8)
|
||
ASTM D5035
|
||
Porosity Minimum, seconds 15 T-460
|
||
Gloss (75o) Maximum, percent 20 ASTM D3218, sec 13
|
||
Fade Maximum color deviation, before and after 1.0 ASTM G155, Table
|
||
resistance fading after 170 hours, DE(CIELAB) X3.1, Cycle 11
|
||
Surface and Shall be soft and pliable but not oily; surface shall not Method B
|
||
coating crack when bent sharply. The back surface shall be
|
||
receptive to a water-based polyvinyl acetate emulsion
|
||
adhesive used to bond the end sheet. The top surface
|
||
shall withstand the lamination process. When
|
||
stretched, the surface coating shall show no defects
|
||
Color Topside shall be flag blue to match (L*=27.3 T-515,
|
||
established standard. a*= 0.1 T-524
|
||
AND b*= -7.0) TIS 0804-04
|
||
Color deviation Maximum, DE(CIELAB) 1.0 Note (1)
|
||
Finish Shall be uniform and have an embossed skiver pattern Method A
|
||
Size Average sheet, inches (mm), 7-1/16 by Method A
|
||
tolerance +1/16" (2 mm) 15-7/8
|
||
AND (182 by and
|
||
403)
|
||
Trim Cloth shall not fray when trimmed Method C
|
||
14
|
||
|
||
Specifications for Property 29455-1 or 20678-4
|
||
Blue Woven Cloth Material for U.S. Passports
|
||
Curl The fabric shall lie flat and have sufficient stiffness to Method D
|
||
feed properly on the Uno automatic passbook binding
|
||
line
|
||
Ply Shall be single ply Method A
|
||
Grain (Warp) Shall be in the long direction ASTM D299
|
||
Blocking The fabric shall not stick together Method E
|
||
Testing and References
|
||
Testing shall be conducted in accordance with cited methods. ASTM method is
|
||
available from the American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive,
|
||
West Conshohocken, PA 19428 or through the website: http://www.astm.org/. Test
|
||
methods designated T-XXX or TIS may be obtained from TAPPI 15 Technology
|
||
Parkway S, Norcross, GA 30092 or at the website: http://www.tappi.org/
|
||
Note (1): Color testing conditions and metrics are as follows: CIELAB color space,
|
||
Illuminant D65, 10o observer and specular component in. The L*, a*, b* values have
|
||
been provided for information only.
|
||
Method A: Visually assess the composition, weave, finish and ply against the
|
||
established standard. Report as OK or Unacceptable.
|
||
15
|
||
|
||
Specifications for Property 29455-1 or 20678-4
|
||
Blue Woven Cloth Material for U.S. Passports
|
||
Method B: Lamination:
|
||
Method C: Use an appropriate scaled measuring implement. Report results to the
|
||
nearest millimeter (1/16"). Report as Equal or Not equal.
|
||
Method D: Assess during the use of the stock. Material shall run, print and accept
|
||
hot stamping satisfactorily. Report as OK or Unacceptable.
|
||
Method E: Press 2 pieces of fabric between newsboard for a period of 24 hours.
|
||
Observe for blocking. Report as OK or Unacceptable.
|
||
Qualified Products
|
||
All products shall conform to the above specification requirements. In order for a brand
|
||
name to be included in the Qualified Products List (QPL) below, it must have been
|
||
qualified prior to the issuance of the specification. The brand name product shall meet
|
||
all specification requirements for qualification. For qualification testing/evaluation, the
|
||
sample set described below in the sample requirement paragraph is required.
|
||
Awards will be predicated on the use of a product listed below or on a product, which
|
||
prior to the time set for opening of bids, has been tested and approved. Once the
|
||
product is accepted for the QPL, it need not be retested for a 3-year period unless the
|
||
brand name (product) characteristics have been changed.
|
||
The following brand name product is on the QPL for this property:
|
||
ICG Holliston No. 32007281481
|
||
16
|
||
|
||
B.2 Specifications for Property 27533-6
|
||
Maroon Woven Cloth Material for U.S. Passports
|
||
General Requirements
|
||
Suitable for use as a cover for U.S. passports; able to accept heat stamping of
|
||
imitation gold foil; running on the Uno automatic binding line. Stock will be
|
||
used in air-conditioned pressroom maintained at 24 ±2 oC and 45 ±8 percent
|
||
relative humidity.
|
||
Specific Requirements
|
||
PROPERTY REQUIREMENT METHOD
|
||
Composition Shall be 100% cotton fabric coated with pyroxylin, Mfg'r's technical
|
||
acrylic, polyurethane, or other non-migratory resin. data sheet /
|
||
spectroscopy /
|
||
Method A
|
||
Thickness Average, inch (±10%) 0.014 ASTM D1777
|
||
(mm) (0.35)
|
||
Weave Drill 2 / 1 Method A
|
||
Weight Average finish cloth, oz/yd2 (g/m2) 10 (340) T-410
|
||
±10% 5 (170)
|
||
Minimum base cloth, oz/yd2 (g/m2)
|
||
Thread count Per in2 (cm2) 100 (40) ASTM D3775
|
||
Breaking Minimum Warp / Filling, lb/in 80 / 50
|
||
strength (kN/m) (14 / 8.8)
|
||
ASTM D5035
|
||
Porosity Minimum, seconds 15 T-460
|
||
Gloss (75o) Maximum, percent 25 ASTM D3218, sec
|
||
13
|
||
Fade Maximum color deviation, before and 1.0 ASTM G155, Table
|
||
resistance after fading for 72 hours, DE(CIELAB) X3.1, Cycle 11
|
||
Surface and Shall be soft and pliable but not oily; surface shall Method B
|
||
coating not crack when bent sharply. The back surface
|
||
shall be receptive to a water-based polyvinyl
|
||
acetate emulsion adhesive used to bond the end
|
||
sheet. The top surface shall withstand the
|
||
lamination process. When stretched, the surface
|
||
coating shall show no defects.
|
||
Color Topside shall be maroon to match (L*=30.1 T-515,
|
||
established standard. a*= 7.3 T-524
|
||
AND b*= 3.8) TIS 0804-04
|
||
Color Maximum, DE(CIELAB) 1.0 Note (1)
|
||
deviation
|
||
Finish Shall be uniform and have an embossed skiver Method A
|
||
pattern.
|
||
Size Average sheet, inches (mm), 7-1/16 by Method A
|
||
tolerance +1/16" (2 mm) 15-7/8
|
||
AND (182 by and
|
||
403)
|
||
Trim Cloth shall not fray when trimmed.
|
||
Method C
|
||
17
|
||
|
||
Specifications for Property 27533-6
|
||
Maroon Woven Cloth Material for U.S. Passports
|
||
Curl The fabric shall lie flat and have sufficient stiffness Method D
|
||
to feed properly on the Uno automatic passbook
|
||
binding line.
|
||
Ply Shall be single ply. Method A
|
||
Grain (Warp) Shall be in the long direction. ASTM D299
|
||
Blocking The fabric shall not stick together. Method E
|
||
Testing and References
|
||
Testing shall be conducted in accordance with cited methods. ASTM method is
|
||
available from the American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor
|
||
Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428 or through the website:
|
||
http://www.astm.org/. Test methods designated T-XXX or TIS may be
|
||
obtained from TAPPI 15 Technology Parkway S, Norcross, GA 30092 or at the
|
||
website: http://www.tappi.org/
|
||
Note (1): Color testing conditions and metrics are as follows: CIELAB color
|
||
space, Illuminant D65, 10o observer and specular component in. The L*, a*,
|
||
b* values have been provided for information only.
|
||
Method A: Visually assess the composition, weave, finish and ply against the
|
||
established standard. Report as OK or Unacceptable
|
||
Method B: Lamination:
|
||
.
|
||
18
|
||
|
||
Specifications for Property 27533-6
|
||
Maroon Woven Cloth Material for U.S. Passports
|
||
Method C: Use an appropriate scaled measuring implement. Report results to
|
||
the nearest millimeter (1/16"). Report as Equal or Not equal.
|
||
Method D: Assess during the use of the stock. Material shall run, print and
|
||
accept hot stamping satisfactorily. Report as OK or Unacceptable.
|
||
Method E: Press 2 pieces of fabric between newsboard for a period of 24
|
||
hours. Observe for blocking. Report as OK or Unacceptable.
|
||
Qualified Products
|
||
None
|
||
19
|
||
|
||
B.3 Specifications for Property 18846-8
|
||
Black Woven Cloth Material for U.S. Passports
|
||
All specifications and requirements the same as for B.1 except for color
|
||
and maximum percent of Gloss (25)
|
||
20
|
||
|
||
B.4 Specifications for Property
|
||
Green Woven Cloth Material for U.S. Travel Documents
|
||
All specifications and requirements the same as for B.1 except for color
|
||
and maximum percent of Gloss is between 20-25.
|
||
21
|
||
|
||
APPENDIX C – COVER SIZING
|
||
22
|
||
|
||
15 l l
|
||
15/16
|
||
7 l l
|
||
3/16
|
||
23
|
||
|
||
.
|
||
24
|
||
|
||
Appendix D Characteristics for Reader/Writers for
|
||
Personalization System Test Kit
|
||
25
|
||
|
||
ICAO Recommendations from ICAO Technical Report: Biometric Deployment of
|
||
Machine Readable Travel Documents, Technical Report Version 2.0 (draft 2) dated
|
||
5 May 04
|
||
• The T=CL protocol shall be fully supported.
|
||
• The total time from placing the book on the reader to when the transaction is completed shall
|
||
be less than 11 seconds for reading or writing 32KB of data.
|
||
• The reader/writer shall quickly determine access type (i.e. active vs. passive).
|
||
• The reader/writer shall have a visual indication that it is on and functioning.
|
||
• The reader/writer shall not read an EP more than 10cm away.
|
||
• The reader/writer shall support a rate of 424 kbps (kilobits per second).
|
||
• The connection between the reader/writer and PC, or PC type equipment shall be USB 2.0 or
|
||
Firewire.
|
||
• The reader/writer shall be configured to immediately attempt to re-establish a
|
||
session with a chip/antenna if the transaction has not successfully completed.
|
||
• Once a transaction has completed, the reader/writer shall be configured to attempt further
|
||
transactions until the chip/antenna has been removed from the field and re-presented.
|
||
Additional Desired Reader/Writer Characteristics
|
||
• Physical Characteristics
|
||
♦ Form Factor
|
||
o Dimensions shall not exceed 30cm in length, width, or height
|
||
o Weight shall not exceed 7kg
|
||
♦ Power (Input Voltage) – 100 – 240 VAC +/- 10%
|
||
♦ Hardware Interfaces
|
||
o USB 2.0 or Firewire required handling all EP scanning and chip
|
||
read/write communications between the device and the host PC.
|
||
• Functional Characteristics
|
||
Full-page multi-function readers capable of reading the EP data page, MRZ, and the
|
||
embedded IC .
|
||
♦ Interoperability
|
||
o Support for ISO/IEC 14443
|
||
(cid:131) Type A and Type B
|
||
o Automatically detect, read and write to both Type A and Type B chips.
|
||
o IC reader will be able to personalize chip while EP is inserted in the
|
||
device for Full Page scanning, regardless of location of the chip within
|
||
the EP book.
|
||
o Ability to send ISO 7816 commands or chip-proprietary commands
|
||
directly to the chip while in contact with the reader (not limited to
|
||
specific API calls).
|
||
26
|
||
|
||
(cid:131) Reader API needs to emulate these ISO 7816 type commands,
|
||
or allow for direct passage of these commands through the chip
|
||
reader interface:
|
||
o Create Dedicated File
|
||
o Create Elementary File
|
||
o Select Dedicated File
|
||
o Select Elementary File
|
||
o Write Binary
|
||
o Read Binary
|
||
(cid:131) A non-ISO 7816 command that will be required, and may be
|
||
chip-specific will be ‘Lock Chip’ to assure that no more data
|
||
can be written to chip – this must also be allowed to pass
|
||
directly through the chip reader interface.
|
||
(cid:131) Support for ‘Active’ authentication of the chip must be
|
||
provided. If U.S. uses ‘Active’ authentication, Quality Control
|
||
must verify that the chip can be unlocked using the prescribed
|
||
method – which will require another set of ISO 7816 or
|
||
proprietary commands, which may include:
|
||
o Get Challenge
|
||
o Verify
|
||
o Authenticate (External or Internal)
|
||
♦ Scan Capability
|
||
o Resolution – minimum 300dpi full color scan, this matches the
|
||
resolution of the printed EP
|
||
o Image format – bitmap or tiff common format for high quality
|
||
inspection
|
||
o Size of Scanned Image – minimum of 1000 pixels wide by 600 pixels
|
||
high
|
||
o Once placed in reader device, document shall remain stationary
|
||
without human support so as to enable reliable chip reading/writing
|
||
and providing Quality Control personnel with the flexibility required to
|
||
perform all required tasks.
|
||
♦ Document Authentication
|
||
o Printed MRZ Check
|
||
(cid:131) OCR MRZ characters – provide access to returned values
|
||
(cid:131) Recommended: verify MRZ against ICAO specifications for
|
||
printed MRZ (spacing, skew, alignment)
|
||
(cid:131) Recommended: ability to verify location of all data page fields
|
||
– ability to set thresholds to assure that each value and label is
|
||
printed in it’s defined zone on the page
|
||
(cid:131) Provide Cropped Photo of Applicant from Full Page Scan
|
||
o Illuminations
|
||
(cid:131) Full Color – to be displayed as visual data page on screen while
|
||
book is in reader
|
||
(cid:131) Additional illuminations may include:
|
||
o Ultraviolet (UV) – enables testing of any relevant UV
|
||
marks or inks
|
||
o Infrared – assurance against tampering or unwanted
|
||
marks on the document
|
||
♦ Application
|
||
o Software Developer’s Kit
|
||
(cid:131) API - Allow for customized application development on a host
|
||
PC that will enable the functionality expressed in this document
|
||
and desired by Passport Systems for Quality Control purposes.
|
||
(cid:131) Include the following documentation
|
||
o Developer’s Guide
|
||
27
|
||
|
||
o User’s Guide
|
||
o Sample Code utilizing API calls
|
||
♦ Windows 2000 device driver, driver availability for future OS upgrades
|
||
within Windows or another platform
|
||
• Security Features
|
||
♦ Tamper Resistance
|
||
Provide a locking mechanism for the device housing to prevent unauthorized
|
||
manipulation of the internal device hardware.
|
||
• Deployment
|
||
♦ Maintenance plans to be delivered with devices projecting:
|
||
o Hardware upgrades
|
||
o Firmware upgrades
|
||
o Chip Reader upgrades
|
||
o Driver upgrades
|
||
o Any other required maintenance (lens cleaning, tuning, etc)
|
||
♦ Configuration Guides and Troubleshooting Support required for setup
|
||
• Warranty
|
||
♦ Industry standard warranty against defects in materials and workmanship from date of
|
||
shipment.
|
||
28
|
||
|
||
♦
|
||
Appendix E: GLOSSARY
|
||
29
|
||
|
||
Authentication Use of a defined cryptographic procedure
|
||
to
|
||
determine the genuineness of an entity
|
||
Authenticity A genuine property inherent to an entity
|
||
CA Consular Affairs; A division of the US
|
||
Department of State whose mission is to
|
||
‘administer laws, formulate regulations
|
||
and implement policies relating to the
|
||
broad range of consular services
|
||
provided to American citizens abroad.’
|
||
CA also issues Visas to aliens desiring to
|
||
enter the US and passports to American
|
||
citizens.
|
||
Certificate Authority An body that guarantees the authenticity
|
||
of a the public keys for digital signatures.
|
||
Certificate Revocation List (CRL) A CRL is a time-stamped list, signed by
|
||
the CA, identifying canceled certificates.
|
||
CLIN A contract line item number (CLIN) is
|
||
the number that identifies a specific
|
||
deliverable of a contract.
|
||
Common Criteria The Common Criteria is a catalog of
|
||
criteria for the certification and
|
||
evaluation of information technology
|
||
systems.
|
||
ConOps Concept of Operations. A high level
|
||
requirements document that provides a
|
||
mechanism for users to describe their
|
||
expectations of the target system in terms
|
||
that need not be quantifiable and
|
||
testable..
|
||
COTS Commercial of the shelf (COTS) is a
|
||
product that is a commercialized
|
||
commodity.
|
||
CRC A cyclic redundancy check (CRC) is a
|
||
commonly utilized form of error
|
||
detection code (EDC) for the protection
|
||
of data.
|
||
DHS The Department of Homeland Security
|
||
(DHS) is the new consolidation of 22
|
||
formerly disparate domestic agencies
|
||
tasked with protecting the homeland for
|
||
terrorist aggression.
|
||
30
|
||
|
||
Digital signature Based upon asymmetric cryptographic
|
||
algorithms, a digital signature is used to
|
||
confirm the authenticity of an electronic
|
||
document.
|
||
DoS The US Department of State is the
|
||
government body tasked with promoting
|
||
US interests abroad through diplomacy.
|
||
DPA Differential Power Analysis (DPA) is a
|
||
class of attacks that allows cryptanalysts
|
||
to remove secret keys and compromise
|
||
the security of smart cards and other
|
||
cryptographic devices by examining their
|
||
power use.
|
||
EEPROM EEPROM (electrically erasable
|
||
programmable read-only memory) is
|
||
user-modifiable read-only memory that
|
||
can be erased and reprogrammed (written
|
||
to) repeatedly through the application of
|
||
higher than normal electrical voltage.
|
||
EF Elementary File
|
||
Electrostatic discharge (ESD) The discharge of built up of electrostatic
|
||
energy
|
||
Enhanced Border Security Act A response to the terrorist attacks of 9-
|
||
11, this bill orders all pertinent agencies
|
||
to combat illegal border crossings by
|
||
foreign nationals.
|
||
EP An electronic passport (EP) is a passport
|
||
with an integrated circuit (IC) contactless
|
||
chip embedded in it.
|
||
EP Book Cover EP book cover is an inlay containing an
|
||
ISO 14443 Type A-compliant contactless
|
||
chip and antenna assembly and adhered
|
||
to specified passport cover stock (fabric).
|
||
It is the size of the current US passport
|
||
cover.
|
||
EP Book Cover Sheet A sheet of three EP Book Covers in a
|
||
three-up configuration.
|
||
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) The Federal Acquisition Regulation
|
||
(FAR) codifies policies for procurement
|
||
of supplies and services by executive
|
||
agencies.
|
||
Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Formulated by Office of Management
|
||
and Budget (OMB), the Federal
|
||
Enterprise Architecture (FEA) is a
|
||
business-based framework designed to
|
||
31
|
||
|
||
aid the Federal Government in becoming
|
||
more citizen-based, result-oriented, and
|
||
market-centered.
|
||
FFP Firm Fixed Price
|
||
Federal Travel Regulations (FTR) The Federal Travel Regulations (FTR) ,
|
||
addressed in 41 Code of Federal
|
||
Regulations (CRF), dictates the statutory
|
||
requirements and Executive branch
|
||
procedure for travel by those authorized
|
||
to travel at the expense of the Federal
|
||
Government.
|
||
FR Facial Recognition
|
||
GPO The US Government Printing Office
|
||
(GPO) is the government organization
|
||
tasked with distributing official
|
||
information from each of the three
|
||
branches of the US government.
|
||
GSA The US Government Service
|
||
Administration (GSA) is an organization
|
||
devoted to providing proven and efficient
|
||
business tools to other government
|
||
entities.
|
||
IAW In Accordance With
|
||
IC An integrated circuit (IC) is a
|
||
microelectronic computer circuit built-in
|
||
a chip or semiconductor.
|
||
ICC Integrated Circuit Card. ISO uses the
|
||
term to encompass all those devices
|
||
where an integrated circuit is contained
|
||
within an ISO ID1 identification card
|
||
piece of plastic.
|
||
ICAO The International Civil Aviation
|
||
Organization (ICAO) promotes security
|
||
and understanding via cooperative
|
||
aviation regulation.
|
||
IEC The International Electrotechnical
|
||
Commission (IEC) is the clearinghouse
|
||
for standards in all areas of
|
||
electrotechnology.
|
||
Inlay An inlay shall consist of an ISO 14443
|
||
Type A or Type B compliant
|
||
chip/antenna assembly embedded in
|
||
protective material.
|
||
32
|
||
|
||
INS The Immigration and Naturalization
|
||
Service (INS) was the government
|
||
agency that handled immigration and
|
||
nationality matters for foreign nationals
|
||
entering the US. It was recently
|
||
absorbed into DHS.
|
||
ISO The Geneva based International
|
||
Organization for Standardization (ISO) is
|
||
a network of national standards institutes
|
||
for 147 countries working to realize
|
||
standards solutions that meet both
|
||
business requirements and serve the
|
||
broader needs of society.
|
||
KB kilobyte
|
||
Key Management All administrative functions as they
|
||
relate to the generation, dispersion,
|
||
storage, modernization, demolition and
|
||
addressing of cryptographic keys.
|
||
LDS A logical data structure (LDS) defines
|
||
that manner in which a user is presented
|
||
with data.
|
||
MCU Micro-Controller Unit
|
||
MIS Management Information System
|
||
MRZ The machine-readable zone (MRZ) is the
|
||
area of a passport page where machine
|
||
readable data is stored.
|
||
NIST A division of the US Department of
|
||
Commerce, the National Institute of
|
||
Standards and Technology (NIST) is
|
||
responsible for the standardization of
|
||
information technology on the national
|
||
level.
|
||
NTWG ICAO’s New Technology Working
|
||
Group
|
||
OCR Optical character recognition
|
||
Open System Hardware and/or software systems that
|
||
use open standards.
|
||
OTP One time programmable
|
||
PC Polycarbonate
|
||
PC Personal computer
|
||
PET Polyethylene terephthalate
|
||
33
|
||
|
||
Pilot An operational field test of the entire EP
|
||
system and its associated processes.
|
||
Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) is a
|
||
security system which provides digital
|
||
signatures, encryption and secure web
|
||
access.
|
||
PVC Polyvinylchloride
|
||
QC Quality control
|
||
RAM Random access memory (RAM) is a type
|
||
of volatile memory that loses its contents
|
||
in the absence of power.
|
||
Random Number Generator (RNG) A program that generates a series of
|
||
numbers at random such that each
|
||
number is selected independently of any
|
||
of the other numbers in the series.
|
||
RF Radio Frequency. With reference to ICs,
|
||
it is a chip that is powered by transmitted
|
||
radio waves.
|
||
ROM Read-only memory (ROM) is a non-
|
||
volatile memory whose contents cannot
|
||
be altered.
|
||
SDK Software Development Kit
|
||
SPA Simple Power Analysis (SPA) is a
|
||
simpler form of the DPA attack that does
|
||
not necessitate statistical examination.
|
||
SOW Statement of Work
|
||
TDIS The Travel Document Issuance System
|
||
(TDIS) is utilized by DoS/CA to
|
||
efficiently issue travel documents to US
|
||
citizens.
|
||
TOR Task Order Request
|
||
Transport Key The transport key is a key that locks the
|
||
chip while it is being shipped.
|
||
Consequently, if somebody breaks into
|
||
the truck and steals the chips, they are
|
||
not in possession of valid chips. We
|
||
anticipate loading transport keys into the
|
||
issuance system in order to enable
|
||
personalization of the inlays.
|
||
34
|
||
|
||
USPS United States Postal Service (the US Post
|
||
Office)
|
||
Volatile memory A type of memory that preserves its
|
||
contents only as long as it is supplied
|
||
with power.
|
||
VWP The Visa Waiver Program (VWP) allows
|
||
citizens of specific nations to travel to
|
||
the United States for tourism or business
|
||
for 90 days or less without acquiring a
|
||
visa.
|
||
35
|
||
|
||
SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD 1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER RATING PAGE OFPAGES
|
||
UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700) DO- 1 |
|
||
2. CONTRACT NUMBER 3. SOLICITATION NUMBER 4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION 5. DATE ISSUED 6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO.
|
||
SEALED BID (IFB)
|
||
GPO-EP2004 6/21/04
|
||
x NEGOTIATED (RFP)
|
||
7. ISSUED BY CODE 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If other than Item 7)
|
||
US Government Printing Office
|
||
732 North Capitol and H Streets, NW
|
||
Room A340 – Stop MMP
|
||
Washington, DC 20401
|
||
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations “offer” and “offeror” mean “bid” and “bidder”
|
||
SOLICITATION
|
||
9. Sealed offers in original and 4 copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if hand carried, in the
|
||
depository located in Room b104, until _3:00 pm___ local time _
|
||
CAUTION LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and conditions
|
||
contained in this solicitation.
|
||
10. FOR A. NAME B. TELEPHONE (NO COLLECT CALLS) C. E-MAIL ADDRESS
|
||
INFORMATION ➨ Name AREA CODE NUMBER EXT.
|
||
Albertha M Broadnax 202 512-0966 abroadnax@gpo.gov
|
||
CALL:
|
||
11. TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
||
((cid:57)) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S) ((cid:57)) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S)
|
||
PART I - THE SCHEDULE PART II - CONTRACT CLAUSES
|
||
X A SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM I CONTRACT CLAUSES
|
||
B SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICE/COST PART III - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACH.
|
||
C DESCRIPTION/SPECS./WORK STATEMENT J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
|
||
D PACKAGING AND MARKING PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
|
||
E INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE K REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS
|
||
F DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE AND OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS
|
||
G CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA L INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS
|
||
H SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS M EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
|
||
OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)
|
||
NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.
|
||
12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within _____ calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period is inserted by the
|
||
offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the
|
||
designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.
|
||
13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT 10 CALENDAR DAYS 20 CALENDAR DAYS 30 CALENDAR DAYS CALENDAR DAYS
|
||
➨
|
||
(See Section I) % % % %
|
||
14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS AMENDMENT NO. DATE AMENDMENT NO. DATE
|
||
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the
|
||
SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents
|
||
numbered and dated):
|
||
15A. NAME CODE FACILITY 16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN
|
||
AND OFFER (Type or print)
|
||
ADDRESS
|
||
OF
|
||
OFFEROR
|
||
15B. TELEPHONE NUMBER 15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE 17. SIGNATURE 18. OFFER DATE
|
||
AREA CODE NUMBER EXT. ADDRESS IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE
|
||
- ENTER SUCH ADDRESS IN
|
||
SCHEDULE.
|
||
AWARD (To be completed by Government)
|
||
19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED 20. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION
|
||
22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN 23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM
|
||
COMPETITION: (4 copies unless otherwise specified)
|
||
10 U.S.C. 2304(c) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)( )
|
||
24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7) CODE 25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE
|
||
26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) 27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 28. AWARD DATE
|
||
(Signature of Contracting Officer)
|
||
Section B – Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs
|
||
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE (U.S. GPO)
|
||
36
|
||
|
||
Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs
|
||
ELECTRONIC (INTEGRATED CIRCUIT (IC) EMBEDDED) PASSPORT
|
||
COVERS
|
||
37
|
||
|
||
B1 Services and Prices/Costs
|
||
B1.1
|
||
The Offeror shall perform this contract on a Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Time and
|
||
Material (T&M), and cost reimbursable basis, at prices at or below those stated in
|
||
Section B of this contract, and in accordance with FAR 16.500 and other sections of
|
||
this contract and this Delivery Order.
|
||
B1.2
|
||
This is a firm-fixed price contract except for CLIN 0004, which is Time and Materials
|
||
(T&M), and CLIN 0009, which is cost reimbursable. Offerors must submit a proposal
|
||
for all items for the entire life of this contract. Therefore, a price must be proposed
|
||
for each CLIN for the life of this contract. Multiple awards are anticipated, but a
|
||
single award is possible.
|
||
B2
|
||
In order to be considered for contract award, Offerors must propose prices for
|
||
all CLINS. It is understood that, with respect to those CLINS defined as
|
||
MANDATORY, the Government will purchase at least the minimum prescribed
|
||
amount from contract awardees. However, the Government reserves the right to
|
||
process a mixture of products from multiple awardees to add up to a maximum
|
||
total described under each CLIN. OPTIONAL CLINS will be evoked at the
|
||
Government’sdiscretion.
|
||
38
|
||
|
||
B3: SERVICES AND PRICE/COST
|
||
Base Period
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
0001 Personalization System Test 7 Kits (with 5 EA $ $
|
||
Kit – Type A or B compliant inlays per Kit)
|
||
(See C7.1 Testing Material
|
||
and C7.1.1 Personalization
|
||
System Test Kit)
|
||
MANDATORY
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
0002 Electronic Passport (EP) 700 EP Book EA $ $
|
||
Book Cover Sheets for Test Cover Sheets
|
||
Book Production - ISO (2100 EP Book
|
||
14443 Type A or B compliant. Covers where 1
|
||
Book Covers shall be maroon Book Cover
|
||
(See C7.1 Testing Material Sheet equals 3
|
||
and C7.1.2 EP Book Cover Book Covers)
|
||
Sheets for Test Book
|
||
Production.)
|
||
MANDATORY
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
0003 IC Reader/Writers for GPO 1 - 50 EA $ $
|
||
(See C7.3, Readers for GPO)
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
0004 Technical Support (See C7.5 Est. EA $ $
|
||
Technical Support) 80 – 4000 hrs.
|
||
MANDATORY
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
39
|
||
|
||
0005 Electronic Passport (EP) 1 –6,000 EP EA $ $
|
||
Book Cover Sheets for SIA Book Cover
|
||
Pilot –ISO 14443 Type A or B Sheets (3 – 18,
|
||
compliant. Book Covers shall 000 EP Book
|
||
be maroon (See C7.2 EP Book Covers)
|
||
Cover Sheets with Embedded
|
||
Inlays) 6,000 – 12,000
|
||
EP Book Cover
|
||
Sheets (18,000 –
|
||
36,000) EP
|
||
Book Covers)
|
||
12,000 – 20,000
|
||
EP Book Cover
|
||
Sheets (36,000 –
|
||
60,000 EP Book
|
||
Cover Sheets
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
0006 Electronic Passport (EP) 1,000 to EA $ $
|
||
Book Cover Sheets for 1 million EP
|
||
Domestic Agency Pilot and Book Cover
|
||
Full Agency Deployment – Sheets
|
||
ISO 14443 Type A or B
|
||
compliant. Multiple Cover 1 million to 2
|
||
Sheet colors as directed by the million EP Book
|
||
government (See C7.2 EP Cover Sheets
|
||
Book Cover Sheets with
|
||
Embedded Inlays) 2 million to 3
|
||
million EP Book
|
||
Cover Sheets
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
0007 Adhesive (Testing and SIA Sufficient EA $ $
|
||
Pilot) (See C7.4 Adhesive) quantity of
|
||
MANDATORY adhesive to
|
||
attach EP Book
|
||
Cover to inside
|
||
end page
|
||
material for
|
||
identified
|
||
quantity of book
|
||
covers ordered
|
||
in CLIN: 0002,
|
||
and 0005
|
||
spoilage. Under
|
||
current
|
||
production
|
||
40
|
||
|
||
conditions, one
|
||
gallon of
|
||
adhesive will
|
||
produce 1500
|
||
three-up cover
|
||
strips
|
||
Estimated Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description Quantity of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
0008 Adhesive (for Domestic Sufficient EA $ $
|
||
Agency Pilot and full agency quantity of
|
||
deployment) (See C7.4 adhesive in 55-
|
||
Adhesive) gallon drums to
|
||
attach EP Book
|
||
OPTIONAL Cover to inside
|
||
end page
|
||
material for
|
||
identified
|
||
quantity of book
|
||
covers ordered
|
||
in CLIN 0006
|
||
Estimated Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description Quantity of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
0009 Travel As Needed EA $ $
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Estimated Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description Quantity of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
00010 Extended Warranties As Needed EA $ $
|
||
(5 years) (See C6 Warranty)
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Estimated Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description Quantity of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
00011 Extended Warranties As Needed EA $ $
|
||
(10 years) (See C6 Warranty)
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Option Year One
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
41
|
||
|
||
1003 IC Reader/Writers for GPO 1 - 50 EA $ $
|
||
(See C7.3, Readers for GPO)
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
1004 Technical Support Est. EA $ $
|
||
80 – 4000 hrs.
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
1006 Electronic Passport (EP) 1,000 EA $ $
|
||
Book Cover Sheets for Full to 1 million EP
|
||
Production ISO 14443 Type Book Cover
|
||
A or B compliant. Multiple Sheets
|
||
Book Cover Sheet colors as
|
||
directed by the Government 1 – 2.5 million
|
||
EP Book Cover
|
||
OPTIONAL Sheets
|
||
2.5 – 3.5 million
|
||
EP Book Cover
|
||
Sheets
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
1008 Adhesive (for full Sufficient EA $ $
|
||
production) quantity of
|
||
adhesive in 55-
|
||
OPTIONAL gallon drums to
|
||
attach EP Book
|
||
Cover to inside
|
||
end page
|
||
material for
|
||
identified
|
||
quantity of book
|
||
covers ordered
|
||
in CLIN: 1006
|
||
Estimated Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description Quantity of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
1009 Travel As Needed EA $ $
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
42
|
||
|
||
Estimated Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description Quantity of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
10010 Extended Warranties As Needed EA $ $
|
||
(5 years)
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Estimated Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description Quantity of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
10011 Extended Warranties As Needed EA $ $
|
||
(10 years)
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Option Year Two
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
2003 IC Reader/Writers for GPO 1 - 50 EA $ $
|
||
(See C7.3, Readers for GPO)
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
2004 Technical Support Est. EA $ $
|
||
80 – 4000 hrs.
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
2006 Electronic Passport (EP) 1,000 EA $ $
|
||
Book Cover Sheets for Full to 1 million EP
|
||
Production –ISO 14443 Type Book Cover
|
||
A or B compliant. Multiple Sheets
|
||
Book Cover Sheet colors as
|
||
directed by the Government 1-2.8 million EP
|
||
Book Cover
|
||
OPTIONAL Sheets
|
||
2.8 – 3.8 million
|
||
EP Book Cover
|
||
Sheets
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
43
|
||
|
||
Issue
|
||
2008 Adhesive (for full Sufficient EA $ $
|
||
production) quantity of
|
||
adhesive in 55-
|
||
OPTIONAL gallon drums to
|
||
attach EP Book
|
||
Cover to inside
|
||
end page
|
||
material for
|
||
identified
|
||
quantity of book
|
||
covers ordered
|
||
in CLIN: 2006
|
||
Estimated Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description Quantity of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
2009 Travel As Needed EA $ $
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Estimated Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description Quantity of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
20010 Extended Warranties As Needed EA $ $
|
||
(5 years)
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Estimated Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description Quantity of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
20011 Extended Warranties As Needed EA $ $
|
||
(10 years)
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Option Year Three
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
3003 IC Reader/Writers for GPO 1 - 50 EA $ $
|
||
(See C7.3, Readers for GPO)
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
44
|
||
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
3004 Technical Support Est. EA $ $
|
||
80 – 4000 hrs.
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
3006 Electronic Passport (EP) 1,000 EA $ $
|
||
Book Cover Sheets for Full to 1 million EP
|
||
Production –ISO 14443 Type Book Cover
|
||
A or B compliant. Multiple Sheets
|
||
Book Cover Sheet colors as
|
||
directed by the Government 1 –3.1 million
|
||
EP Book Cover
|
||
OPTIONAL Sheets
|
||
3.1 – 4.1 million
|
||
EP Book Cover
|
||
Sheets
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
3008 Adhesive (for full Sufficient EA $ $
|
||
production) quantity of
|
||
adhesive in 55-
|
||
OPTIONAL gallon drums to
|
||
attach EP Book
|
||
Cover to inside
|
||
end page
|
||
material for
|
||
identified
|
||
quantity of book
|
||
covers ordered
|
||
in CLIN: 3006
|
||
Estimated Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description Quantity of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
45
|
||
|
||
3009 Travel As Needed EA $ $
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Estimated Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description Quantity of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
30010 Extended Warranties As Needed EA $ $
|
||
(5 years)
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Estimated Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description Quantity of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
30011 Extended Warranties As Needed EA $ $
|
||
(10 years)
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Option Year Four
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
4003 IC Reader/Writers for GPO 1 - 50 EA $ $
|
||
(See C7.3, Readers for GPO)
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
4004 Technical Support Est. EA $ $
|
||
80 – 4000 hrs.
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
4006 Electronic Passport (EP) 1,000 EA $ $
|
||
Book Cover Sheets for Full to 1 million EP
|
||
Production ISO 14443 Type Book Cover
|
||
A or B compliant. Multiple Sheets
|
||
Book Cover Sheet colors as
|
||
directed by the Government. 1 – 3.4 million
|
||
EP Book Cover
|
||
OPTIONAL Sheets
|
||
46
|
||
|
||
3.4 – 4.4 million
|
||
EP Book Cover
|
||
Sheets
|
||
Quantity Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
4008 Adhesive (for full Sufficient EA $ $
|
||
production) quantity of
|
||
adhesive in 55-
|
||
OPTIONAL gallon drums to
|
||
attach EP Book
|
||
Cover to inside
|
||
end page
|
||
material for
|
||
identified
|
||
quantity of book
|
||
covers ordered
|
||
in CLIN: 4006
|
||
Estimated Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description Quantity of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
4009 Travel As Needed EA $ $
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Estimated Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description Quantity of Price Price
|
||
Issue
|
||
40010 Extended Warranties As Needed EA $ $
|
||
(5 years)
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
Estimated Unit Unit Extended
|
||
CLIN Description Quantity of Price Price
|
||
47
|
||
|
||
Issue
|
||
40011 Extended Warranties As Needed EA $ $
|
||
(10 years)
|
||
OPTIONAL
|
||
48
|
||
|
||
Section C – Specifications/Statement of Work
|
||
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE (GPO)
|
||
STATEMENT OF WORK
|
||
ELECTRONIC (INTEGRATED CIRCUIT (IC) EMBEDDED) PASSPORT
|
||
COVERS
|
||
49
|
||
|
||
Table of Contents
|
||
C1 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................52
|
||
C1.1 EP Program Background.............................................................................................................52
|
||
C1.2 Electronic Passport (EP) Materials To Be Procured....................................................................53
|
||
C1.2.1 General.............................................................................................................................53
|
||
C1.2.2 Proposals..........................................................................................................................53
|
||
C1.2.3 Test Passport Evaluations................................................................................................53
|
||
C1.2.4 Assembly of Test Passports by GPO...............................................................................54
|
||
C1.2.5 Testing of Passports.........................................................................................................54
|
||
C1.2.6 Passport Covers with Embedded Inlays for Special Issuance Agency (SIA) Pilot
|
||
Testing.........................................................................................................................................54
|
||
C1.2.7 Field Testing of SIA Pilot Passports................................................................................54
|
||
C1.2.8 Future Purchases..............................................................................................................54
|
||
C1.3 Electronic Passport (EP) Program Description............................................................................55
|
||
C1.3.1 General.............................................................................................................................55
|
||
C1.3.2 Phase I Preparation for EP Pilot Issuance........................................................................55
|
||
C1.3.3 Phase II EP Pilot Issuance and Preparation for Full Agency Deployment.......................56
|
||
C1.3.4 Phase III Full Agency Deployment (Deployment of EP to All Domestic Passport
|
||
Agencies).....................................................................................................................................56
|
||
C2 PROCUREMENT OBJECTIVE.................................................................................57
|
||
C3 PROCUREMENT SCOPE..........................................................................................57
|
||
C4 DELIVERABLES.......................................................................................................57
|
||
C4.1 Base year.....................................................................................................................................58
|
||
C4.1.1 Personalization System Test Kit (CLIN 0001)................................................................58
|
||
C4.1.2. EP Book Cover Sheets for Test Book Production (CLIN 0002).....................................58
|
||
C4.1.3 Reader/Writers for GPO (CLIN 0003).............................................................................58
|
||
C4.1.4 Technical Support (CLIN 0004)......................................................................................58
|
||
C4.1.5 EP Book Cover Sheets for SIA Pilot (CLIN 0005)..........................................................58
|
||
C4.1.6 EP Book Cover Sheets for Domestic Agency Pilot and Full Agency Deployment
|
||
(CLIN 0006)................................................................................................................................58
|
||
C4.1.7 Adhesive (Testing and SIA Pilot) (CLIN 0007)..............................................................58
|
||
C4.1.8 Adhesive (Domestic Agency Pilot and Full Agency Deployment) (CLIN 0008)............59
|
||
C4.1.9 Travel (CLIN 0009).........................................................................................................59
|
||
C4.1.10 Extended Warranties (CLIN 00010 and CLIN 00011)..................................................59
|
||
C4.2 Option Year 1..............................................................................................................................59
|
||
(11) The Offeror shall provide specified equipment, supplies, materials and technical support
|
||
needed for option year 1:.............................................................................................................59
|
||
C4.3 Option Year 2..............................................................................................................................59
|
||
C4.4 Option Year 3..............................................................................................................................59
|
||
C4.5 Option Year 4..............................................................................................................................60
|
||
C5 DELIVERABLE SCHEDULE...................................................................................60
|
||
C6 WARRANTY..............................................................................................................60
|
||
C7 REQUIREMENTS......................................................................................................61
|
||
C7.1 Testing Materials.........................................................................................................................61
|
||
C7.1.1 Personalization System Test Kit......................................................................................61
|
||
C7.1.2 EP Book Cover Sheets for Test Book Production....................................................................62
|
||
C7.2 EP Book Cover Sheets with Embedded Inlays............................................................................62
|
||
C7.2.1 EP Book Cover Physical Characteristics.........................................................................63
|
||
C7.2.2 Inlay.................................................................................................................................63
|
||
C7.2.3 EP Book Cover Testing & Inspection..............................................................................69
|
||
C7.3 Reader/Writers for GPO..............................................................................................................73
|
||
C 7.3.1 GPO Reader/Writer Requirements.................................................................................73
|
||
C 7.3.2 GPO Reader/Writer Related Data Requirements............................................................74
|
||
C7.4 Adhesive......................................................................................................................................75
|
||
C7.5 Technical Support.......................................................................................................................75
|
||
C7.6 General Requirements.................................................................................................................75
|
||
C7.6.1 Changes in Deliverable Design or Characteristics...........................................................75
|
||
C7.6.2 Delivery Preparations to Government or Authorized Agent............................................75
|
||
C7.6.3 Manufacturing Consumables...........................................................................................76
|
||
C7.6.4 Manufacturing..................................................................................................................77
|
||
C7.6.5 Miscellaneous..................................................................................................................77
|
||
50
|
||
|
||
C8 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES.......................................................................78
|
||
C9 KEY PERSONNEL.....................................................................................................78
|
||
C9.1................................................................................................................................Project Manager 78
|
||
C9.2..................................................................................................................Senior Scientist/Engineer 79
|
||
C9.3..................................................................................Senior Scientist/Engineer “Adhesive Expert” 79
|
||
C9.4.........................................................................................................Journeyman Scientist/Engineer 80
|
||
C9.4 Software Systems Engineer.........................................................................................................80
|
||
APPENDIX A Electronic Passport (EP) Concept of Operations..................................81
|
||
APPENDIX B EP Book Cover Material Specification................................................82
|
||
APPENDIX C Sizing Specification for EP Cover........................................................83
|
||
APPENDIX D Characteristics for Reader/Writers for Personalization System Test
|
||
Kit 84
|
||
APPENDIX E Glossary...............................................................................................85
|
||
51
|
||
|
||
C1 INTRODUCTION
|
||
C1.1 EP Program Background
|
||
The Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs (DoS/CA), in cooperation with its
|
||
partners at the United States Government Printing Office (GPO) and the Department of
|
||
Homeland Security (DHS), intends to implement a new version of the United States
|
||
passport. The new passport will contain an embedded contactless Integrated Circuit (IC)
|
||
with an antenna assembly and will be identified in this document as an Electronic
|
||
Passport (EP). The new technology is expected to enhance the security of the passport
|
||
and facilitate the movement of travelers at ports of entry. It is anticipated that the new
|
||
passport will initially be issued on a limited scale by late 2004 (Pilot implementation). It
|
||
is expected that all newly issued, full-validity, United States passports will have
|
||
embedded inlays (IC/antenna assembly in a protective plastic envelope) by the end of
|
||
calendar 2005.
|
||
The need for a new passport is driven by Section 303 of the Enhanced Border Security
|
||
and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002 (Enhanced Border Security Act), which requires that
|
||
nations, whose citizens are allowed to enter the United States under the provisions of the
|
||
Visa Waiver Program, must have a program in place to “incorporate biometric and
|
||
document authentication identifiers that comply with applicable biometric and document
|
||
identification standards established by the International Civil Aviation Organization
|
||
(ICAO).”
|
||
ICAO has determined that contactless IC technology is the only acceptable technology
|
||
for global interoperability. Therefore, no other storage technology will be considered for
|
||
the U.S. EP initiative. Through a series of meetings during the last two years, ICAO has
|
||
developed a set of recommendations that include writing both the digital facial image and
|
||
biographic data of the bearer on an IC. This is the same data currently found on the data
|
||
page of the U.S. passport.
|
||
Inclusion of IC/antenna assemblies in passports should provide the border inspection
|
||
community with a tool of significant security benefits that can speed the movement of
|
||
travelers through border inspection processes.
|
||
While the United States is not mandated to comply with the requirements of section 303
|
||
of the Enhanced Border Security Act, it is desirable for the U.S. to commit to a
|
||
comprehensive program to incorporate this new technology into the U.S. passport. Doing
|
||
so will:
|
||
• Ensure the continued international acceptability and interoperability of the U.S.
|
||
passports;
|
||
• Recognize that Visa Waiver Program (VWP) participant states, which will be
|
||
required to change their passports for travel by their nationals to the U.S., will be
|
||
likely to impose reciprocal requirements on Americans traveling to their nation;
|
||
52
|
||
|
||
• Improve the security of the U.S. passport and help strengthen U.S. border security
|
||
by allowing the Department of Homeland Security to focus its efforts on travelers
|
||
(Americans and otherwise) with less secure travel documents.
|
||
Consistent with principles of international reciprocity, the United States intends to adhere
|
||
to these same requirements. Therefore, the United States Electronic Passport will be
|
||
designed to comply with the recommendations of the ICAO, Document 9303, Part I and
|
||
its associated technical reports and annexes relating to advanced storage media for use in
|
||
passports. As such, the passport will include a full digital image of the passport bearer
|
||
stored on an IC and will incorporate the use of the ICAO Logical Data Structure which
|
||
prescribes the placement of data on the IC. The data stored on the IC will be
|
||
authenticated with a Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) based digital signature as
|
||
recommended by ICAO.
|
||
The Department of State (DoS) Under-Secretary of State for Management has authorized
|
||
the DoS Bureau of Consular Affairs (CA) to pursue integrating a contactless IC/antenna
|
||
assembly in the United States passport and to comply with ICAO recommendations
|
||
regarding the use of this advanced storage medium to store a digital, biometric full facial
|
||
image along with currently captured bio-data onboard the IC.
|
||
C1.2 Electronic Passport (EP) Materials To Be Procured
|
||
C1.2.1 General
|
||
GPO will procure materials that will be used in its fabrication of the new United States
|
||
EP. These materials include IC/antenna assemblies embedded in inlays adhered to
|
||
passport book cover material, contactless IC reader/writers, adhesive, technical support
|
||
and approved travel by awardees during the life of the procurement. This procurement
|
||
will be a full and open competition subject to the Buy American Act for one base year
|
||
plus four option years.
|
||
C1.2.2 Proposals
|
||
Offerors responding to this Request for Proposal (RFP) will submit technical and cost
|
||
proposals as well as three samples of their offered IC/antenna configurations for review.
|
||
As part of their cost proposals, Offerors shall certify their compliance or noncompliance
|
||
with the terms of the Buy American Act. The required samples are to serve as tools for
|
||
the technical evaluation team to better visualize the offered concept. These samples will
|
||
not be tested as part of the evaluation. GPO may elect to make an award to multiple
|
||
Offerors based upon the top-ranked technical, cost, and past performance proposals.
|
||
Offerors who fail to submit samples as part of their proposal will not be considered for
|
||
contract award.
|
||
C1.2.3 Test Passport Evaluations
|
||
Following award, GPO will exercise CLIN 0001 to each of the awardees in order to
|
||
obtain required Personalization System Test Kits (see C4.1.1). When notified of the
|
||
award, within one business day, awardees will be required to submit, by secure overnight
|
||
53
|
||
|
||
delivery, the Personalization System Test Kits. The readers in the kit need to permit the
|
||
writing and reading of the passports for test purposes. The reason for the early receipt of
|
||
readers and SDKs is to permit the IC/antenna test teams to begin to set up a write/read
|
||
capability to evaluate the test passports described below (see C1.2.4).
|
||
C1.2.4 Assembly of Test Passports by GPO
|
||
Within ten days of contract award, the awardees will be required to submit three-up
|
||
contactless IC embedded inlays adhered to compliant cover material (CLINs 0002) (see C
|
||
4.1.2). GPO will incorporate these three-up EP Book Cover Sheets, plus an appropriate
|
||
amount of adhesive (CLIN 0007), into test passport books, using the GPO UNO passport
|
||
production equipment. This will determine the ability of the offered product to be
|
||
integrated into the GPO passport book manufacturing process.
|
||
C1.2.5 Testing of Passports
|
||
A specified number of test passports, fabricated to include EP Book Covers from each
|
||
Offeror, will be subjected to a pre-determined battery of physical durability, security,
|
||
electronic, and interoperability tests as described in C7.2.3. This test regimen is expected
|
||
to take approximately 20 work days.
|
||
C1.2.6 Passport Covers with Embedded Inlays for Special Issuance
|
||
Agency (SIA) Pilot Testing
|
||
Based on the results of the testing conducted upon the test passports, GPO will determine
|
||
to which awardees it will exercise CLIN 0005 (see C4.1.5) to supply passport cover
|
||
material with embedded inlays for the purpose of producing passports for the Special
|
||
Issuance Agency pilot. If more than one awardee’s products pass the testing regimen,
|
||
GPO may elect to exercise CLIN 0005 to more than one awardee. The awardees of this
|
||
CLIN will be required to submit this material to GPO within 40 days after receipt of
|
||
order. Upon receipt of the cover material with embedded inlays from each Offeror, GPO
|
||
will fabricate passport books on the UNO production line. These maroon cover, Official
|
||
passports will be the first U.S. electronic passports issued for actual use in travel by
|
||
employees of the U.S. government.
|
||
C1.2.7 Field Testing of SIA Pilot Passports
|
||
While bearers of Official EPs can reenter the U.S. at any border location, it is envisioned
|
||
that the DHS will establish a pilot border control station at two locations; Dulles
|
||
International Airport (Washington) and at Los Angeles International Airport, where EP
|
||
bearers can use their passports for entry into the United States. Information relating to
|
||
the physical and electronic performance of the SIA Pilot EPs will be collected. If for
|
||
some reason this test cannot be established during the allotted testing period, the DoS
|
||
may choose to establish a program whereby it can recall passports from volunteers who
|
||
have been issued EPs in order to examine the physical and electronic performance of the
|
||
passports.
|
||
C1.2.8 Future Purchases
|
||
Under the terms of this contract, GPO has the right to place orders for deliverables in any
|
||
quantity, to any of the awardees, at any time. Furthermore, GPO is not obligated to order
|
||
54
|
||
|
||
any quantities beyond the minimum quantities prescribed in this contract. It is GPO’s
|
||
intention, at its discretion, to make multiple awards to Offerors whose covers with
|
||
embedded inlays, when integrated into passport books, have been determined to meet the
|
||
technical and business needs of both GPO and the DoS. GPO plans to make a high
|
||
volume purchase of book covers with inlays from one awardee and lower volume
|
||
purchases of book cover inlays from the other awardees. Purchased quantities associated
|
||
with this distribution will be made at the discretion of GPO.
|
||
C1.3 Electronic Passport (EP) Program Description
|
||
C1.3.1 General
|
||
To meet CA’s ambitious implementation milestones, program risk will be minimized
|
||
with a carefully controlled multi-phased effort shown in Figure1. This figure (EP
|
||
Program Overview) illustrates the tiered alignment of the integrated components:
|
||
• Three defined and partitioned implementation phases
|
||
• Inlay and book cover order and delivery dates
|
||
• Critical milestones and decision points
|
||
• Definition and implementation of an acquisition strategy
|
||
• System development, testing, and upgrades
|
||
• Pilot initial implementation
|
||
• Full scale “roll out” implementation
|
||
• Management oversight and system engineering support
|
||
C1.3.2 Phase I Preparation for EP Pilot Issuance
|
||
The goal of the first implementation phase is to ensure issuance of an EP, which meets
|
||
the stated security and durability requirements by late-December 2004. To successfully
|
||
meet this milestone, a number of tasks must be accomplished by DoS including procuring
|
||
EPs from GPO that meet CA requirements and developing/modifying the relevant
|
||
systems and subsystems necessary for the Pilot implementation.
|
||
The procurement related deliverables due during Phase I include (Note: days are work
|
||
days):
|
||
• Personalization System Test kit delivered one day after contract award.
|
||
• EP Book Covers for testing the EP book ten days after contract award.
|
||
• Reader/Writers for GPO ten days after contract award.
|
||
• EP Book Covers for the SIA Pilot forty days after order.
|
||
• Adhesive in sufficient quantity to adhere the EP Book Cover to the end sheets due
|
||
date of Book Cover deliveries.
|
||
• Technical support as needed. Technical support services may be utilized on an on-
|
||
call basis at any time throughout the duration of this contract.
|
||
55
|
||
|
||
C1.3.3 Phase II EP Pilot Issuance and Preparation for Full Agency
|
||
Deployment
|
||
This second phase has two goals:
|
||
• Conduct Pilots
|
||
o SIA Pilot: Issuing the EP at SIA to meet the December 2004 deadline
|
||
o Domestic Agency Pilot: Issuing the EP to U.S. citizens at a single,
|
||
domestic passport agency no later than Spring 2005
|
||
• Prepare for Full Agency Deployment
|
||
o Collect relevant performance metrics and technical data
|
||
o Learn as much as possible from the limited issuance to assure success
|
||
during full implementation
|
||
The SIA Pilot will be an operational field test of the entire EP system and its associated
|
||
processes, including book production and EP issuance, conducted at SIA in Washington,
|
||
DC. The pilot will involve issuance of Official United States passports (maroon-cover
|
||
passports) that will be issued to U.S. Government personnel.
|
||
As a well-controlled, systematic operational field test, the SIA Pilot will assure success
|
||
while providing sufficient operational data to properly evaluate the system design and
|
||
processes and will ensure proximity to the EP PMO staff and system designers.
|
||
The Domestic Agency Pilot will extend the operational tests by issuing the EP to U.S.
|
||
citizens no later than Spring 2005. The lessons learned from the SIA Pilot will be
|
||
incorporated into the Domestic Agency Pilot.
|
||
The procurement-related deliverables due during phase II include:
|
||
• Additional EP Book Covers forty working days after order
|
||
• Additional Readers/Writers for GPO as needed
|
||
• Adhesive in sufficient quantity to adhere the EP Book Cover to the end sheets
|
||
• Technical support as needed. Technical support services may be utilized on an on-
|
||
call basis at any time
|
||
C1.3.4 Phase III Full Agency Deployment (Deployment of EP to All
|
||
Domestic Passport Agencies)
|
||
The third phase of the EP Program starting in late spring 2005 will introduce the issuance
|
||
of durable and secure EPs to each of the remaining domestic issuance agencies with the
|
||
goal of issuing all new passports (more than eight million annually) as EPs by the end of
|
||
December 2005.
|
||
The procurement related deliverables due during phase III include:
|
||
56
|
||
|
||
• Additional EP Book Covers forty working days after order.
|
||
• Additional Readers/Writers for GPO as needed
|
||
• Adhesive in sufficient quantity to adhere the EP Book Cover to the end sheets
|
||
• Technical support as needed. Technical support services may be utilized on an on-
|
||
call basis at any time.
|
||
PPHHAASSEE II PPHHAASSEE IIII PPHHAASSEE IIIIII
|
||
(cid:131)DEVELOP SYSTEM & (cid:131)RUN PILOTS (cid:131)FULL DOMESTIC AGENCY
|
||
SUBSYSTEMS (cid:131)EVALUATE PILOTS DEPLOYMENT
|
||
(cid:131)PREPARE FOR PILOTS (cid:131)MODIFY SYSTEMS
|
||
(cid:131)PREPARE FOR DOMESTIC
|
||
AGENCY DEPLOYMENT
|
||
B B D O S O H E O O E L K K E I V T T C E E S O R S F T V O E I E P N R R G DE F L O I R V C E S O R I V A E E P P R I L S B O O T OK C D D O O E V M I L S E E I S R V S U S E T A R I T N C O E C A P G E G B P B E O O Y N O F C K O Y R D C IM E O P L V L I E V E R E M S R E F E N O P T R A B F T O U I O O L K L N SCALE
|
||
9-7-04 9-20-04 10-29-04 12-27-04 12-2004 2-05 4-05 6-05 12-05
|
||
JUN AUG OCT DEC FEB APR JUN AUG OCT DEC FEB APR JUN AUG OCT DEC
|
||
C E O A C C PE N W O O AB C P TN V AWO OR B T E R O VA A O R R D K EC R O A R T D K C T CO SC E I O V P AO S EE R I O V B P P A R D E OR I BS PL E R DO O IO R FS L EKOO T R O F KRO T R ISISS O SU O U F A F A E N E N P C P CEE A T T O A T O D T OIM N E O D I C E PM N E I L A C E S PE I G I L A M OS EE I G N EO MNE NN CE N T YN C T Y S I Y M S D SI Y PM E T D L S C EP E T T E M I L C E O M S T E I M I W EO O M S I N N IW E O D TN N IE D T E
|
||
DEFINE & IMPLEMENT
|
||
ACQUISITIONSTRATEGY PILOTS:
|
||
•6 MONTHS TOTAL DURATION
|
||
•DATA COLLECTION
|
||
CONTINUOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT •ONGOING PERFORMANCE
|
||
& TESTING ANALYSIS
|
||
MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT & SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SUPPORT
|
||
MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT: PLANNING DOCUMENTS: SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SUPPORT:
|
||
• • • • • C C C G C A O A A PO N P S IN T T M T R E O E E A G R C R I T N A O G T R E C S D O M PR M O I C T E T S E S E TEAMS (IPT) (cid:131) (cid:131) (cid:131) (cid:131) (cid:131) B P C S SY Y R U O S S O S N T T I G O N E E R P E M M A S S S M S R P C E P E Q A L C S U A I E I F N R IC EM TI E O N N T S S (cid:131) (cid:131) (cid:131) (cid:131) (cid:131) A P I S R I M C O F L Q P P U O L U R T E I C S D M E I E T E S F I N E O IN T L N I A E T S C T I T I O T R O I N O A N T N S E P T G L R Y A A N TEGY (cid:131) (cid:131) (cid:131) (cid:131) (cid:131) (cid:131) R D T I I F M P A E E E T P S C S Q T E L I I U G L N E M I N I M R G T I O N M V I A E N N C A N T E E I L L I T N T E N U I A O T R D G D T S R I A I N I I V I N T O N N G A G I T N G O L A E I M N I N N R D V O D A T O N T E T L I I A E T O V C M O N E H R D C N I O N C IC O G A A R C L D O I S N N U T A P R T P A I O O C R N T T ORS
|
||
Figure 1. EP Program Overview.
|
||
C2 PROCUREMENT OBJECTIVE
|
||
This procurement will lead to the introduction of a new U.S. Passport, an internationally
|
||
interoperable EP compliant with the recommendations of the International Civil Aviation
|
||
Organization (ICAO). (1)The EP shall have an International Organization for Standardization
|
||
(ISO) 14443 Type A or Type B contactless IC/antenna assembly embedded in its back cover. The
|
||
use of this new U.S. Passport is described in Appendix A (Abstract of Concept of Operations for the
|
||
Integration of Contactless Chip in the U.S. Passport).
|
||
C3 PROCUREMENT SCOPE
|
||
This RFP consists of possible multi-Offeror, multi-option procurement of specified
|
||
equipment, supplies, materials and technical support needed to develop and implement a
|
||
new, internationally interoperable EP.
|
||
C4 DELIVERABLES
|
||
57
|
||
|
||
The primary items to be procured in this contract are sheets of book covers for the EP.
|
||
Each EP book cover consists of an inlay containing an ISO 14443 Type A or Type B
|
||
compliant contactless IC/antenna assembly adhered to passport book cover stock. Book
|
||
cover sheets consist of three book covers per sheet (Three up configuration). The cover
|
||
fabric and cover size are described in Appendix B and Appendix C, respectively.
|
||
C4.1 Base year
|
||
C4.1.1 Personalization System Test Kit (CLIN 0001)
|
||
(2)The Offeror shall provide a Personalization System Test kit (as described below in
|
||
C7.1).
|
||
C4.1.2. EP Book Cover Sheets for Test Book Production (CLIN 0002)
|
||
(3)The Offeror shall provide EP Book Cover sheets for producing books for Official
|
||
Passports. These Passports will be used for book and personalization system testing. EP
|
||
Book Cover sheets are described in C7.2. The cover color of the books will be maroon.
|
||
C4.1.3 Reader/Writers for GPO (CLIN 0003)
|
||
(4) The Offeror shall provide IC Reader/Writers for GPO as specified in section C7.3, IC
|
||
Reader/Writers for GPO
|
||
C4.1.4 Technical Support (CLIN 0004)
|
||
(5) The Offeror shall provide Technical Support as described in section C7.5. On call
|
||
technical support for duration of this contract. The support that may be called upon
|
||
includes:
|
||
Senior Scientist/Engineer 1
|
||
(cid:131)
|
||
Senior Scientist/Engineer 2 “Adhesives Expert”
|
||
(cid:131)
|
||
Journeyman Scientist/Engineer
|
||
(cid:131)
|
||
Software Systems Engineer
|
||
(cid:131)
|
||
C4.1.5 EP Book Cover Sheets for SIA Pilot (CLIN 0005)
|
||
(6)The Offeror shall provide EP Book Cover sheets for the SIA Pilot EP. Book Cover
|
||
Sheets are described below in C7.2. The cover color of the books will be maroon (for
|
||
official passports).
|
||
C4.1.6 EP Book Cover Sheets for Domestic Agency Pilot and Full Agency
|
||
Deployment (CLIN 0006)
|
||
(7)The Offeror shall provide EP Book Cover sheets for Domestic Agency Pilot and Full
|
||
Agency Deployment. EP Book Cover sheets are described below in C7.2. Color will be
|
||
specified at time of order. Multiple colors may be ordered (blue, maroon, black, green).
|
||
C4.1.7 Adhesive (Testing and SIA Pilot) (CLIN 0007)
|
||
58
|
||
|
||
(8)The Offeror shall provide adhesive (as described in C7.4) to attach EP Book Cover to
|
||
inside end page material sufficient for identified quantity of book covers for Book testing
|
||
and SIA pilot plus spoilage.
|
||
C4.1.8 Adhesive (Domestic Agency Pilot and Full Agency Deployment)
|
||
(CLIN 0008)
|
||
(9) The Offeror shall provide adhesive (as described in C7.4) to attach EP Book Cover to
|
||
inside end page material sufficient for identified quantity of book covers for Domestic
|
||
Agency Pilot and Full Agency Deployment plus spoilage.
|
||
C4.1.9 Travel (CLIN 0009)
|
||
Travel is associated with Technical Support.
|
||
C4.1.10 Extended Warranties (CLIN 00010 and CLIN 00011)
|
||
(10)The Offeror shall provide extended warranties for five years and ten years for inlay
|
||
operation against physical and electronic failures.
|
||
C4.2 Option Year 1
|
||
(11) The Offeror shall provide specified equipment, supplies, materials
|
||
and technical support needed for option year 1:
|
||
(cid:131) Reader/Writers for GPO (CLIN 1003)
|
||
(cid:131) Technical Support (CLIN 1004)
|
||
(cid:131) EP Book Cover Sheets for Full Production (CLIN 1006)
|
||
(cid:131) Adhesive (for full production) (CLIN 1008)
|
||
(cid:131) Travel (CLIN 1009)
|
||
(cid:131) Extended Warranties (CLIN 10010 and CLIN 10011)
|
||
C4.3 Option Year 2
|
||
(12) The Offeror shall provide specified equipment, supplies, materials and technical
|
||
support needed for option year 2:
|
||
(cid:131) Reader/Writers for GPO (CLIN 2003)
|
||
(cid:131) Technical Support (CLIN 2004)
|
||
(cid:131) EP Book Cover Sheets for Full Production (CLIN 2006)
|
||
(cid:131) Adhesive (for full production) (CLIN 2008)
|
||
(cid:131) Travel (CLIN 2009)
|
||
(cid:131) Extended Warranties (CLIN 20010 and CLIN 20011)
|
||
C4.4 Option Year 3
|
||
(13) The Offeror shall provide specified equipment, supplies, materials and technical
|
||
support needed for option year 3:
|
||
(cid:131) Reader/Writers for GPO (CLIN 3003)
|
||
(cid:131) Technical Support (CLIN 3004)
|
||
59
|
||
|
||
(cid:131) EP Book Cover Sheets for Full Production (CLIN 3006)
|
||
(cid:131) Adhesive (for full production) (CLIN 3008)
|
||
(cid:131) Travel (CLIN 3009)
|
||
(cid:131) Extended Warranties (CLIN 30010 and CLIN 30011)
|
||
C4.5 Option Year 4
|
||
(14) The Offeror shall provide specified equipment, supplies, materials and technical
|
||
support needed for option year 4:
|
||
(cid:131) Reader/Writers for GPO (CLIN 4003)
|
||
(cid:131) Technical Support (CLIN 4004)
|
||
(cid:131) EP Book Cover Sheets for Full Production (CLIN 4006)
|
||
(cid:131) Adhesive (for full production) (CLIN 4008)
|
||
(cid:131) Travel (CLIN 4009)
|
||
(cid:131) Extended Warranties (CLIN 40010 and CLIN 40011)
|
||
C5 DELIVERABLE SCHEDULE
|
||
Refer to Section F.
|
||
C6 WARRANTY
|
||
(15)The Offeror shall provide a ten-year warranty from the date of delivery on the secure
|
||
and durable adhesion of its EP book covers to the end page of the EP under normal use.
|
||
Defective products will be replaced or refunded as requested by the Government at
|
||
Offeror’s expense.
|
||
(16) The Offeror shall provide a certification of warranty of a minimum of at least three
|
||
years from the date of delivery for operation of the IC/antenna assembly against physical
|
||
and electronic failures. (17) The Offeror shall provide two extended warranty options,
|
||
five and ten-years from the date of delivery, for operation of IC/antenna assembly against
|
||
physical and electronic failures. Defective products will be replaced or refunded as
|
||
requested by the Government at Offeror’s expense.
|
||
Three up book cover sheets with embedded inlays will be read at multiple stations throughout
|
||
the production process. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to produce a three-up inlay with an
|
||
IC/antenna that will remain fully functional after passing through the U.S. passport
|
||
fabrication process. Fully functional means that the IC communicates and is able to operate
|
||
using the requirements within this RFP, specifically being able to read and write the required
|
||
data to the IC. If any IC/antenna inlays throughout the production process fail, then that
|
||
IC/antenna inlay book cover will be returned for replacement at the Offeror’s expense. If two
|
||
or more IC/antenna inlays fail within any three-up configuration, then the entire three-up
|
||
inlay will be returned for replacement at the Offeror’s expense.
|
||
The Offeror will not be responsible for replacing inlays damaged due to Government
|
||
equipment malfunctions or operator errors.
|
||
60
|
||
|
||
C7 REQUIREMENTS
|
||
Requirements are specified below for the following delivered products and services:
|
||
• Personalization System Development/Test Kit
|
||
• EP Book Cover Sheets
|
||
• Reader/Writers for GPO
|
||
• Adhesive
|
||
• Technical Support
|
||
• General
|
||
C7.1 Testing Materials
|
||
Inlays are required in each of the two testing-related deliverables described below.
|
||
Ideally, these inlays would be identical in form and function to those delivered later in the
|
||
program. However, the Government will accept inlays significantly different from those
|
||
required in later deliverables. Specifically, the IC’s embedded in these test inlays may
|
||
differ in the amount of their Government available EEPROM from those specified in
|
||
C7.2. The Operating System (OS) of these early ICs may, in whole or part, reside on
|
||
EEPROM, i.e. may be soft-masked. If the OS is soft-masked the minimum Government
|
||
available EEPROM shall be 32KB. If the ICs of these deliverables are soft-masked the
|
||
Offeror must certify that the IC/antenna assemblies will function identically to those
|
||
delivered later for useable EPs.
|
||
C7.1.1 Personalization System Test Kit
|
||
Provide Personalization System Test kits for GPO testing including preliminary EP
|
||
interoperability, personalization and production testing as part of Phase 1 outlined in
|
||
section C1.3.2. (18)Each test kit shall include:
|
||
• Five Inlays
|
||
o The physical format of these test inlays need not be identical to the final
|
||
offered inlays in the EP Book Covers required in C.7.2.
|
||
o (19) The IC/antenna assemblies provided at this stage shall meet the
|
||
appropriate requirements in C7.2 and shall be identical to those embedded
|
||
in the EP Book Cover sheets to be delivered later.
|
||
o Documentation:
|
||
(cid:131) Technical Specification
|
||
(cid:131) Command Set Support Documentation
|
||
• One Reader/Writer to reliably operate with CLIN 0001 and CLIN 0002 inlays and
|
||
meet the ICAO characteristics specified in Appendix D.
|
||
o Software Development Kit (SDK)
|
||
(cid:131) Installation Guide
|
||
61
|
||
|
||
(cid:131) User Guide
|
||
(cid:131) Application Programming Interface (API) Guide
|
||
(cid:131) Technical Specification
|
||
(cid:131) Sample application source code capable of executing the
|
||
commands outlined in section C7.2.2.3 compatible with Microsoft
|
||
Visual Studio.
|
||
(cid:131) Software utility capable of displaying basic diagnostics from the
|
||
IC (e.g. IC serial number, answer to select values, transaction time)
|
||
o Windows 2000 Compliant Device Driver
|
||
C7.1.2 EP Book Cover Sheets for Test Book Production
|
||
(20)The EP Book Cover Sheets for producing books that will be used for book and
|
||
personalization system testing shall conform to the specifications of C7.2 except for
|
||
Government available EEPROM as described in C7.1 above.
|
||
C7.2 EP Book Cover Sheets with Embedded Inlays
|
||
The current U.S. Passport book is manufactured in a three-up configuration. (21)
|
||
To maintain the current external appearance of the U.S. passport and to minimize
|
||
change to the GPO production process, the EP book covers with embedded inlays
|
||
shall be delivered with the currently specified cover stock and in the same three
|
||
up configuration, i.e. sheets of three-up fabric covered inlays, which are
|
||
compatible with GPO’s UNO passport production process.
|
||
(22)The EP Book Cover with embedded inlay shall form a monolithic or sealed structure
|
||
around the IC/antenna assembly that will provide physical protection including protection
|
||
against solvents or chemicals.
|
||
(23)The EP Book Cover shall be compatible with the Toppan MP300US printing process
|
||
to be used during personalization.
|
||
DoS plans to personalize the second page of the EP (the new data page) rather than the
|
||
inside front cover which is the current data page of the US Passport. Second page
|
||
personalization with the Toppan will require use of a heavier weight paper for the single
|
||
four-page book sheet that includes the data page. DoS is also considering maintaining the
|
||
number of current weight pages. The EP would then be a 28 or 52 page book where the
|
||
current book is either 24 or 48 pages (the difference being the four pages of the single
|
||
heavier weight sheet added to the EP). These changes together with the added thickness
|
||
of the inlay in the EP cover are expected to affect the Toppan MP300US printing process.
|
||
The Toppan is sensitive to both the total book thickness and to the total thickness of the
|
||
substrate below the security/personalization foil (for the EP the substrate is the EP cover,
|
||
the glued end sheet and the data page). The changes described above will therefore
|
||
62
|
||
|
||
require adjustments and modifications to the Toppan MP300US printer as well as specific
|
||
consideration of how the EP opens and lays flat on the work table of the printer.
|
||
C7.2.1 EP Book Cover Physical Characteristics
|
||
(24)The EP Book Cover sheet shall consist of inlays adhered to book cover stock as
|
||
specified by GPO and in a three-up configuration (specifications attached as Appendix B
|
||
and C).
|
||
(25) The total thickness of the EP Book Cover shall be 0.70 mm +/- 10%. This thickness
|
||
is specified so that CA’s several hundred Toppan printers can be modified to handle
|
||
personalization of the EP without major redesign.
|
||
Specifications for book cover fabric are attached as Appendix B, EP Book Cover
|
||
Material Specification. The government reserves the right to change these book cover
|
||
fabric specifications and/or the security features as required. Alternative book cover
|
||
material [including those that are not on the Qualified Product List (QPL)] that is
|
||
equivalent or superior to the material specified above may be considered, if the Offeror’s
|
||
proposal provides sufficient evidence and proof that it will perform equally or better for
|
||
hot stamping, inlay adhesion, and durability.
|
||
Specifications of book cover and book cover sheet physical dimensions are attached as
|
||
Appendix C, Sizing Specification for EP Book Cover.
|
||
(26) Preference shall be given to products that have a very similar look (lie flat when
|
||
closed) and feel (have similar flexibility) to that of the current Passport.
|
||
(27)Preference shall be given to products with longer than specified life capabilities as
|
||
determined by testing.
|
||
(28)Preference shall be given to products that will be a ‘best fit’ with minimum negative
|
||
impact on current GPO passport book production process and techniques.
|
||
(29)Preference shall be given to products that provide protection against threats such as
|
||
e-beams used in United States Postal Service (USPS) current/planned mail irradiation
|
||
methods.
|
||
(30)Preference shall be given to book cover designs where any attempt to dismantle,
|
||
attack or remove the embedded inlay from the completed passport will result in the
|
||
functional disabling of the IC/antenna assembly and clear physical damage to the book
|
||
being shown.
|
||
C7.2.2 Inlay
|
||
63
|
||
|
||
For proper bonding of the security foil to the second page, the inlay should be smooth
|
||
and continuous from the edge of the cover to the stitching of the inside pages.
|
||
Additionally, GPO’s experience with prototype EPs suggests that the EP cover inlay
|
||
should have a 6 – 8 mm wide channel between the segments making up the front and
|
||
back book covers for satisfactory performance (see Appendix C). This information is not
|
||
intended to restrict the creativity of providers in inlay/cover design nor to suggest that a
|
||
given inlay/cover configuration is preferred. Rather the information is provided to assure
|
||
offered products are compatible with the plans of DoS for second page printing.
|
||
The following are the appropriate standards, physical, functional and security
|
||
requirements that the embedded inlay shall meet.
|
||
C7.2.2.1 Inlay Standards
|
||
(31)The following international recommendations and standards shall be met, as appropriate:
|
||
• ICAO recommendations1:
|
||
Document 9303 Part 1, Passport with Machine Readable Capability.
|
||
(cid:131)
|
||
ICAO Technical Report: Development of a Logical Data Structure (LDS) for
|
||
(cid:131)
|
||
Optional Capacity Expansion Technologies, ICAO’s description of how Data
|
||
must be placed onto the IC of an electronic passport
|
||
ICAO Technical Report: Selection of a Globally Interoperable Biometric for M-A
|
||
(cid:131)
|
||
Identity Confirmation with MRTDs.
|
||
Use Of Contactless ICs In MRTDs v3.1
|
||
(cid:131)
|
||
Security Standards for MRTDs Mar2002
|
||
(cid:131)
|
||
PKI Digital Signatures For MRTDs v4.0
|
||
(cid:131)
|
||
Biometrics Deployment In MRTDs v1.9
|
||
(cid:131)
|
||
• ISO 14443 - Contactless integrated circuit(s) cards - Proximity cards
|
||
o Part 2: Radio frequency interface power and signal interface
|
||
o Part 3: Initialization and anti-collision
|
||
o Part 4: Transmission protocols
|
||
• ISO 10373 Identification cards – Test Methods
|
||
o Part 1 – General characteristics tests
|
||
o Part 3 -Integrated circuit(s) cards with contacts and related interface devices
|
||
o Part 6- Proximity card
|
||
• ISO 7810 – Physical characteristics & Test Methods
|
||
• X509 - Certificates and Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs)
|
||
• ISO 15408 - Common Criteria
|
||
• ISO 17799 - Code of Practice for Information Security Management
|
||
1 Latest versions of most of these are available at http://www.icao.int/mrtd/Home/Index.cfm. Those not yet publicly
|
||
available will be provided.
|
||
64
|
||
|
||
(32)Preference will be given to products in compliance with the Government Smart Card
|
||
Interoperability Specification (GSC-IS) Version 2.1 published by the National Institute of
|
||
Standards and Technology (NIST). In cases where ICAO specifications and GSC-IS
|
||
V2.1 may conflict, the ICAO specifications will take precedence.
|
||
C7.2.2.2 Inlay Physical Characteristics
|
||
(33)The inlay shall consist of an ISO 14443 Type A or Type B compliant IC/antenna
|
||
assembly embedded in protective material. ICAO has determined that contactless IC
|
||
technology is the only acceptable technology for global interoperability. Therefore, no
|
||
other storage technology will be considered for the US EP initiative.
|
||
(34)The inlay material shall span the entire cover (front and back) of the completed
|
||
passport. (35)The IC/antenna assembly shall be positioned in the inlay so that it is located
|
||
in the back cover of the completed book.
|
||
(36)The IC/antenna shall be placed in the booklet as centrally within the rear booklet
|
||
cover as is possible, having regard to maximizing the protection of the IC itself against
|
||
involuntary external abuse.
|
||
(37)The antenna shall conform to ISO 7810 ID-1 specifications.
|
||
(38)The inlay shall be fabricated such that the completed EP book will lie flat when
|
||
closed.
|
||
(39)The inlay protective envelope shall be of a material that will securely and durably
|
||
adhere to the book cover stock and book end sheets so that the finished EP maintains its
|
||
physical integrity as well as or better than the current book.
|
||
An alternative to the use of an inlay protective envelope that is equivalent or superior in
|
||
expected life cycle performance, may be considered, if the Offeror’s proposal provides
|
||
sufficient evidence and proof that it will perform equally or better operationally or for
|
||
book adhesion and inlay durability.
|
||
During the GPO fabrication process, the greatest level of pressure is 44.6 lbs per square
|
||
inch. Highest temperature is room temperature. There is very little stress or impact other
|
||
than die cutting, which is away from the inlay.
|
||
(40)The inlay shall survive temperatures to which it will be exposed during the Toppan
|
||
printing process. The heat roller in the Toppan printer reaches temperatures of roughly
|
||
175 - 185 degrees Fahrenheit, applied to the data page, which is not the back cover.
|
||
(41)The IC/antenna assembly, when integrated into the inlay, shall meet the tolerance
|
||
limits for exposure to the various electromagnetic, physical, mechanical effects, etc., as
|
||
described in ISO 14443-1.
|
||
(42) The Offeror shall certify that the offered inlay is in compliance with the ISO 14443,
|
||
parts 2-4.
|
||
65
|
||
|
||
C7.2.2.3 Inlay Functional Characteristics
|
||
(43) The Offeror shall provide a list (manufacturer and model number) of all readers
|
||
known to interface properly and effectively with the offered IC/antenna assemblies
|
||
(44)The Offeror shall provide a list (manufacturer and model number) of all readers
|
||
known not to interface properly and effectively with the offered IC/antenna assemblies.
|
||
(45)IC/antenna assembly shall support 106 kbps (to be compatible with ISO 14443) but
|
||
shall also support the higher bit rate of 424 kbps (support of even higher rates such as 848
|
||
kbps is highly desirable)
|
||
(46)The IC shall be ISO 14443, parts 2-4 Type A or Type B compliant, and must support
|
||
anti-collision. Any other proposed or proprietary protocol shall not be used.
|
||
(47)IC, prior to being locked, shall support the erasing or deleting of specific data or all
|
||
data when commanded by an authorized source.
|
||
(48) The Offeror shall provide means against the unauthorized writing to any user
|
||
accessible memory prior to being permanently locked at personalization.
|
||
(49) IC shall prevent any writing or erasing of data once the IC has been locked.
|
||
(50)IC shall support the Minimum Set of Commands as specified in the ICAO LDS
|
||
Technical Report: Read Binary and Select File. This is the MINIMUM command set
|
||
adopted by ICAO for verification of personalized travel documents
|
||
(51)The IC shall support the following additional ISO commands for personalization by
|
||
the issuance system:
|
||
• Assuming that handshaking is required for use with the transport key:
|
||
AUTHENTICATE
|
||
VERIFY
|
||
GETCHALLENGE
|
||
• For preparing the data structure:
|
||
SELECTFILE
|
||
CREATEFILE
|
||
DELETEFILE
|
||
• For personalizing the data structure:
|
||
WRITEBINARY
|
||
READBINARY
|
||
READRECORD
|
||
WRITERECORD
|
||
The Offeror is not required to provide the software for personalization.
|
||
(52)The Offeror shall propose a mechanism for permanently locking the memory space
|
||
after completion of personalization.
|
||
(53)Preference shall be given to proposals utilizing 0.18 micron, or smaller, IC
|
||
fabrication technology. The government shall accept a maximum of 0.22 micron
|
||
technology.
|
||
66
|
||
|
||
(54) Data accessing software must support reading of part of the LDS on request without
|
||
reading the whole LDS e.g. read just the facial image in ICAO LDS DG2.
|
||
(55) IC shall support the independent selection of Elementary Files (EFs).
|
||
Operating System Support
|
||
(56)IC/antenna inlay shall have an On-board Operating System as per ISO/IEC Standard
|
||
7816-4.
|
||
(57)The operating and interpreter systems shall comply with standards made available
|
||
throughout the industry including Government Smart Card-Interoperability Specification
|
||
(GSC IS) version 2.1. (The intent is to avoid IC specific encoders and readers.)
|
||
Micro-Controller/Processor:
|
||
• (58)At a minimum ICs shall have an 8-bit processor
|
||
• (59)Preference shall be given to proposals providing enhanced processors and
|
||
capabilities
|
||
• (60)All security functions shall be on a single IC
|
||
Memory:
|
||
• (61)User accessible memory shall be secure (factory lockable and user lockable),
|
||
programmable and non-volatile
|
||
• (62)The offered IC shall have a minimum of 64 KiloBytes (KB) of electrically
|
||
erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM) space available for
|
||
Government discretionary use
|
||
• (63)The memory shall support random access data retrieval of data elements of
|
||
LDS
|
||
• (64)The memory shall support 105 read/write cycles without failure or
|
||
performance degradation
|
||
C7.2.2.4 EP Book Cover Security
|
||
EP Book Cover Security
|
||
(65)The Offeror shall provide both hardware and software protection against
|
||
Differential Power Analysis (DPA) and Simple Power Analysis Attacks (SPA).
|
||
(66)The Offeror shall provide seal/protection of the integrated circuit.
|
||
(67) The Offeror shall provide complete audit controls on all semiconductors to
|
||
include scrap reports and 100% reconciliation.
|
||
67
|
||
|
||
The offered IC shall provide:
|
||
• General capabilities:
|
||
o (68)Hardware and software (logical) tamper-resistance.
|
||
o (69)Security/exception sensors such as voltage, frequency, and temperature.
|
||
o (70)A design to prevent unauthorized access via hardware and software
|
||
security features.
|
||
o (71)Auto detection if tamper attempt is made.
|
||
• Specific Capabilities:
|
||
o (72)Protection against Power line emanations: Minimum information
|
||
leakage measure; functional information being leaked out of the power lines
|
||
should be at least 50% masked with random power fluctuations.
|
||
o (73)Ability to sense input power voltages outside (both over and under) of
|
||
its normal operating range. Upon detection of an out of range condition, the
|
||
IC shall reset to include overwriting of the random access memory (RAM).
|
||
o (74)Ability to sense input frequency outside (both over and under) of its
|
||
normal operating range. Upon detection of an out of range condition, the IC
|
||
shall reset, to include overwriting of the RAM.
|
||
o (75)Ability to sense temperature outside (both over and under) of its
|
||
normal operating range. Upon detection of an out of range condition, the IC
|
||
shall reset, to include overwriting of the RAM.
|
||
o (76)Unique Serial Number stored internally in the IC and not printed on
|
||
the surface of the IC or inlay. ICAO is examining the use of universally
|
||
unique IC serial numbers.
|
||
o (77)A Micro-Controller Unit (MCU) designed to provide a high level of
|
||
protection against physical attacks and including specific hardware features to
|
||
assist in protection against SPA and DPA attacks.
|
||
o (78)Side-channel resistant hardware that protects against power and timing
|
||
attacks (today) and electromagnetic emissions attacks (emerging).
|
||
o (79)Preference given to IC that are certified at Common Criteria Evaluation
|
||
Assurance Level (EAL) 4+ against a Smart Card application ISO 15408
|
||
compliant Protection Profile.
|
||
o (80)Preference will be given to IC/antenna assembly designs where any
|
||
attempt to dismantle or attack the assembly will result in the functionally
|
||
disabling the IC/antenna assembly.
|
||
EP Book Cover Production Facility Security:
|
||
(81) The Offeror shall meet the Prime, EP Book Cover Sheet, and Inlay Production
|
||
Facility Related Security Requirements specified in Section J.
|
||
68
|
||
|
||
(82)The Offeror shall certify that the commercial off-the-shelf IC production facilities
|
||
meets the IC Production Facility Security Requirements specified in Section J.
|
||
C7.2.3 EP Book Cover Testing & Inspection
|
||
(83)The offered cover sheets with the embedded inlays shall be capable of being integrated with
|
||
current passport book components to provide a secure and durable completed EP book that shall
|
||
have a minimum useful life of 10 years. For the purposes of testing EP Book Cover durability,
|
||
construction and engineering, the government will consider ISO and Common Criteria Smart
|
||
Card Security and contact and contactless testing standards as the baseline for EP cover testing.
|
||
These methods, procedures and standards might include, but are not limited to those specified in
|
||
C7.2.2.1
|
||
The selected test methods will be used to evaluate the performance of products from
|
||
different manufacturers, with preference being given to products that demonstrate greater
|
||
durability based on these test results.
|
||
(84)The Offeror shall work with the Government in solving problems that might be
|
||
identified in Government testing.
|
||
C7.2.3.1 Testing Timeline
|
||
There are four testing stages that begin with the certifications provided by the Offerors
|
||
and proceed through the duration of the procurement under normal operations. Stage one
|
||
is the evaluation of the certifications provided by the Offeror in their proposal that the
|
||
Offeror meets prescribed ISO and ICAO standards and recommendations. The second
|
||
stage is associated with the initial testing by the Government of the EP Book Covers in
|
||
preparation for the pilot to determine how well EP Book Cover Sheets perform in terms
|
||
of book fabrication, personalization, and inspection, with special attention on the physical
|
||
durability of the EP Book. The third stage is associated with field-testing during the pilot
|
||
along with continued laboratory testing of the submitted materials, and the fourth stage
|
||
testing is the collection of operational performance data under normal operations of the
|
||
fully implemented EP and may include further laboratory work examining the long-term
|
||
behavior of the submitted materials.
|
||
Stage 1 Testing to be met by Offeror as Part of the Proposal
|
||
(85)The Offeror shall provide evidence that its product is durable, interoperable, secure and meets the
|
||
applicable standards as part of the proposal. (86)The Offeror shall also provide any evidence of having
|
||
tested the offered inlay embedded in book cover as configured in a passport-type document. Evidence
|
||
for such tests and associated methods and parameters as found in Section J may be verified by the
|
||
Government by requesting either the test results and related information in sufficient detail such that
|
||
they can be replicated or the contact point for the certification body that certified the test results.
|
||
69
|
||
|
||
Stage 2 Testing in Preparation for Pilot
|
||
The Government will conduct the first round of post-award evaluations to determine how
|
||
well EP Book Cover Sheets perform in terms of book fabrication, personalization, and
|
||
inspection.
|
||
GPO Book Fabrication Process Tests
|
||
The maroon book cover sheets delivered on day ten after award will be used by GPO to
|
||
fabricate Test Books. GPO will observe and record how each Offeror’s product passes
|
||
through and performs in the GPO UNO book fabrication process.
|
||
Personalization and Inspection Related Tests
|
||
DoS will personalize the resulting test books with dummy data observing and recording
|
||
the performance of each Offeror’s product in the personalization and inspection
|
||
processes. These tests will include:
|
||
• Testing the IC/antenna assembly,
|
||
• Durability Testing,
|
||
• Fraud testing,
|
||
• Security testing, and
|
||
• Tests of how well the EP works with the Toppan Printer.
|
||
Electronic and Functional Lab Tests of IC/Antenna Assembly
|
||
As part of evaluating the IC/antenna inlay assembly materials provided for the EP, DoS
|
||
will assess the IC/antenna inlay characteristics and/or conduct electronic or functional
|
||
testing to complement its durability test procedures. This electronic or functional testing
|
||
will utilize a suite of test tools that will model the way the IC/antenna will be
|
||
personalized and read in the field. This suite will be used to perform both qualitative and
|
||
quantitative tests.
|
||
Test Suite and Setup: Tests will be conducted using standard PC hardware running Windows 2000. Test
|
||
software will be written using Microsoft Visual Studio. Test hardware will be the reader/writer supplied in
|
||
the Test Kits described in section C.7.1.1.
|
||
Qualitative tests: Qualitative tests evaluate the core capabilities of the IC/antenna assembly.
|
||
These tests include:
|
||
• IC tests
|
||
o IC responds to the ISO 7816 commands outlined in section C7.2.2.3.
|
||
o IC meets memory requirements outlined in section C7.2.2.3.
|
||
o IC must be capable of accepting ICAO Logical Data Structure (LDS)
|
||
o IC must support reading back and verifying ICAO LDS.
|
||
o IC supports independent selection of EFs.
|
||
70
|
||
|
||
o IC responds to commands via T=CL protocol.
|
||
o IC supports extended data blocks (greater than 30K).
|
||
Quantitative tests: Quantitative tests will evaluate load and stress induced responses of the
|
||
IC/antenna assembly. These tests include:
|
||
• IC tests
|
||
o Measure transaction time to write ICAO standard LDS to the IC in 32KB
|
||
and 64KB instances. Transaction times shall not exceed those outlined in
|
||
section C.7.4.
|
||
o Measure transaction time to read ICAO standard LDS from the IC in
|
||
32KB and 64KB instances. Transaction times shall not exceed those
|
||
outlined in section C.7.4.
|
||
Durability Lab Tests of EP Book
|
||
As part of evaluating the durability of the EP Book Cover in Stage 2, the DoS through
|
||
NIST will conduct durability testing. The durability testing will be used to evaluate
|
||
offered designs.
|
||
The testing planned during this stage includes:
|
||
• Impact Testing: to assess the ability of the submittals (IC readability) to survive the
|
||
stamping process. One possibility will be to strike the IC/antenna directly on the
|
||
cover page a certain number of times at a force level that can be expected in actual
|
||
usage. Loading is envisioned to be imparted by a falling weight testing machine.
|
||
One question that will be addressed is: “Can the IC/antenna survive the full number
|
||
of strikes, and if not, then when do they fail?”.
|
||
• Torsion/Flexure Testing: to estimate the structural stability of the passport. The
|
||
goal of this test will be to see if the book materials separate after a certain number of
|
||
flexings.
|
||
• Chemical Resistance Testing: to determine the effects of incidental exposure to
|
||
social chemicals such as acetone, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol and salt water. For
|
||
example, if we dip the cover containing the IC/antenna in these chemicals for five
|
||
seconds, does anything detrimental happen to the book or the IC/antenna?
|
||
• Bend Testing: to determine if the IC/antenna can continue to be read if the book is
|
||
subjected to bending forces.
|
||
• Electromagnetic/Static Electricity Testing: to identify vulnerabilities in these areas.
|
||
• Environmental Exposure/Cycling Testing: to identify potential structural and
|
||
IC/antenna weaknesses upon temperature and humidity cycling.
|
||
71
|
||
|
||
Fraud Testing
|
||
DoS will direct attacks against the physical and electronic structure of the inlay and other
|
||
related components of the passport. Attempts will be made to alter, change or substitute
|
||
data on the IC.
|
||
Security Testing
|
||
DoS will assess the level of physical security that the book design provides to the
|
||
IC/antenna assembly. Tamper testing will be performed to determine the ability of the
|
||
proposed EPs to resist removal of the IC/antenna assembly from the book without
|
||
noticeable damage to the IC/antenna assembly and the book, and with damage to the
|
||
book but not the IC/antenna assembly. Offerors can expect that the testing approach will
|
||
consider the use of heat, moisture, chemicals, sharp instruments as well as other means.
|
||
Products will be rated on their effectiveness at protecting the IC/antenna assembly.
|
||
Tests of How Well the EP Works with the Toppan Printer
|
||
Evaluation and testing will be performed on EPs personalized on the Toppan MP300US
|
||
printers modified to handle the additional thickness of the inlay and page two data page.
|
||
If any offered product is not compatible with use on the Toppan printers, then the
|
||
Government may decline the option to make further purchases from that Offeror.
|
||
Stage 3 Testing during Pilot (Field Test)
|
||
A six-month pilot testing period, including the initial SIA Pilot and the Domestic Agency
|
||
Pilot, will start in late 2004. This will be an initial implementation of the EP. Testing
|
||
during this pilot period will be performed in cooperation with DHS and a number of
|
||
foreign governments to test the durability and interoperability of the EP under field
|
||
conditions. Performance data will be collected. If the IC/antenna assembly in the EP fails
|
||
to function or a durability problem arises, an attempt will be made to ascertain the
|
||
circumstances of the failure/problem and at the Government’s discretion it will work with
|
||
the Offeror to seek a remedy for the problem. An analysis of this data will be performed
|
||
as part of Phase II of the EP Program. In addition, laboratory testing may be conducted
|
||
to assess the book’s structural integrity, bend and torsion testing, resistance to chemicals,
|
||
resistance to environmental exposure and humidity/temperature cycling. The books will
|
||
be submitted to an accelerated physical aging test to obtain an estimate of the EP’s
|
||
behavior over the required life-span of ten years. Testing may also include static
|
||
electricity and electromagnetic testing.
|
||
The testing results in conjunction with offered costs for the book covers will help
|
||
determine the option for further purchases by the Government.
|
||
72
|
||
|
||
Stage 4 Testing under Normal Operations
|
||
The Government reserves the right to perform any of the verifications set forth in the
|
||
specifications below.
|
||
• Electrical, Functional, and Durability Testing. Among others, the electrical, functional,
|
||
and durability tests used in the initial testing of the EP Book Covers will be used to assess
|
||
the quality of the EP Book Covers delivered during normal operations of the fully
|
||
implemented EP.
|
||
• Random Sampling. Random sampling is performed by dividing the production
|
||
run into ten sub lots and selecting an equal number of products from a different
|
||
area within each sub lot. Random sampling will remain in multiples of 100
|
||
products.
|
||
• New Configuration / New Assembly. (87)After approval and prior to Government
|
||
commitment to purchase, the Offeror shall provide the Government with product
|
||
samples for evaluation.
|
||
• Acceptance Testing. Prior to delivery of each new production run using an
|
||
existing configuration, the Offeror may be required to provide the Government
|
||
100 product samples.
|
||
• (88)Quality Testing. Upon Government request, the Offeror shall furnish products
|
||
selected randomly from a production run.
|
||
C7.3 Reader/Writers for GPO
|
||
C 7.3.1 GPO Reader/Writer Requirements
|
||
At least four IC reader/writers are required by GPO to be inserted into each of its two EP
|
||
production lines. (89)The reader/writers shall perform as described in this section. At a
|
||
minimum, Offerors shall provide reader/writers that are ISO 14443 Type A and Type B
|
||
compliant for the production line segments described below.
|
||
The first reader/writer station will be on segment A of the production line above the
|
||
feeding area where the EP Book Cover sheets enter the UNO machine. This station may
|
||
consist of one or more reader/writers that must quickly check that all three IC/antennas in
|
||
a single EP Book Cover sheet are functioning. The reader/writer must record test results
|
||
including a running total of nonfunctioning IC/antennas. This information will be used to
|
||
reconcile the one for one replacement of inoperable IC/antenna shipped to GPO. This will
|
||
be considered as unusable product from the Offeror.
|
||
A second reader/writer station will be at the end of segment A. This reader/writer station
|
||
will be used to check that each book, in three up configuration form, has survived the EP
|
||
book binding process and if not, the bad book will be marked as bad. The reader/writer
|
||
will record test results.
|
||
73
|
||
|
||
A third reader/writer, at the point in segment B of the production line where the cut books
|
||
are bar coded, will be used to read the IC serial number and associate it with the EP book
|
||
bar code (the unique blank paper book identifier) in a data base to be designed. The EP
|
||
book identifier/IC serial number data will be passed to DoS as part of each blank book
|
||
batch delivery. This reader/writer will also interact with the ejection system on the UNO
|
||
line if the book fails to read.
|
||
The fourth reader/writer will be on the makeup station. The makeup station builds a new
|
||
book when spoilage occurs on the production line. The new book is bar-coded with the
|
||
number of the spoiled book so that the books in a production batch are consecutively
|
||
numbered. This reader/writer will rewrite the database with the new IC serial number
|
||
now associated with the barcode of the spoiled/new book.
|
||
C 7.3.2 GPO Reader/Writer Related Data Requirements
|
||
The GPO will accumulate EP blank book data and transfer data files to DoS in XML
|
||
(format to be agreed upon) containing the following GPO shipping information:
|
||
• GPO Shipment Lot #
|
||
• GPO Shipment Quantity
|
||
• Shipment Date
|
||
• Shipment Destination
|
||
• Book #
|
||
(90)The Offeror shall provide a software application/utility that will operate with the
|
||
reader/writers provided within this RFP to read the IC serial number of each IC within
|
||
the inlay material and match those serial numbers read to the manifest provided. The
|
||
electronic shipping manifest (CD) containing the following information in two formats, a
|
||
XML file format and a comma delimited (CSV) file format:
|
||
• IC Manufacturer
|
||
• IC type (including memory size)
|
||
• IC number
|
||
• IC OS and version
|
||
• Inlay manufacturer
|
||
• Book Color
|
||
• Shipping date
|
||
• Shipping document number
|
||
• Lot number
|
||
• Order number
|
||
• Bundle size and quantity
|
||
• Serial numbers of ICs grouped into bundles as packed
|
||
• Each bundle must be listed in the shipping manifest (CD) and each
|
||
bundle must have a serial number with a barcode label, to identify
|
||
each physical bundle.
|
||
74
|
||
|
||
C7.4 Adhesive
|
||
Adhesive is to be used to adhere the delivered EP Book Cover to the rest of the passport book
|
||
(specifically to the 100% rag paper end sheets). (91) The adhesive shall produce a durable book with
|
||
minimum change to the current GPO production line and processes. See section C7.6.3.
|
||
C7.5 Technical Support
|
||
(92) The Offeror shall provide GPO on call technical support in its set up and testing of
|
||
the EP Book production lines and in their initial operations. GPO technical support is
|
||
expected to include assistance in inserting reader/writers into the lines and in their set up
|
||
and initial operation; assistance in setting up the IC and book related data collection; and
|
||
the technical support of an adhesives expert.
|
||
(93)The Offeror shall also provide Smart Card-related technical support to DoS to ensure
|
||
the successful implementation of any EP driven required changes to the current passport
|
||
processes, equipment or material.
|
||
(94)Technical support shall commence upon award. The Offeror shall provide priority
|
||
on-call technical support with a four (4) hour response time at the fixed hourly rate(s).
|
||
Charges shall be computed to the nearest quarter of an hour. The following are no-
|
||
chargeable items:
|
||
Remedial support on the same problem,
|
||
(cid:131)
|
||
Travel time to and from site.
|
||
(cid:131)
|
||
C7.6 General Requirements
|
||
C7.6.1 Changes in Deliverable Design or Characteristics
|
||
(95)Once the Government chooses an acceptable product, the Offeror shall not
|
||
change, enhance, or modify any of the offered product specifications without
|
||
written approval of the Government.
|
||
C7.6.2 Delivery Preparations to Government or Authorized Agent
|
||
• General: (96)Preservation and packaging of all products shall afford adequate
|
||
protection against deterioration and physical damage during shipment, handling,
|
||
and storage. (97)Marking, shipment, and storage shall also be IAW commercial
|
||
practices. (98)Products shall be packaged to keep them free of contamination by
|
||
dirt, dust, debris and fingerprints until the Government user opens the package.
|
||
(99)Manufacturer shall inventory and ship inlays to GPO Production. (100)Inlays
|
||
shall be stored and shipped in a standard, secure manner. (101)Manifesting logs
|
||
and audit ability shall be provided.
|
||
75
|
||
|
||
• Packaging: (102)EP Book Cover sheets shall be packed such that the inlay
|
||
manufacturer lot number and IC serial numbers are visible on the package unit. It
|
||
is desirable that IC serial numbers be non-sequential. Several EP Book Cover
|
||
sheets units may be included per shipment. (103)Each unit shall have a label
|
||
warning that EP Book Cover sheets should remain in wrapped package until ready
|
||
for use. Each package of EP Book Cover sheets shipped is to be placed in tamper
|
||
evident packaging. (104)Each shipment of EP Book Cover sheets shall have a
|
||
packing list detailing the IC serial numbers included in the package.
|
||
• Marking: (105)Marking on shipment packages shall clearly show name and
|
||
address of the receiving organization, along with appropriate invoice numbers and
|
||
indication of contents, as specified by this contract. (106)The inside of the
|
||
package shall be clearly marked with quantities, manufacturer warranty
|
||
information, and other information of contents, as specified by this contract.
|
||
• Electronic Data File: (107)The Offeror shall provide an electronic data file that
|
||
contains the information required by the customer’s inventory control system to
|
||
manage and maintain inlay inventory and version control (See C7.3).
|
||
• Transportation: (108)Shipping carriers shall transport all packages containing
|
||
EP Book Cover sheets. (109)Carrier shall ship EP Book Cover sheets by
|
||
traceable means to the GPO Production facility.
|
||
• Transport Keys: (110)Each EP Book Cover sheet delivery shall have a unique
|
||
transport key according to commercial best practices.
|
||
C7.6.3 Manufacturing Consumables
|
||
(111)Adhesives shall adhere the EP Book Cover to rest of book. (112)Offeror shall provide,
|
||
at the Government’s option, an adhesive that is compatible with their IC/antenna inlay-cover
|
||
material and a 100% rag paper (the book end sheet) that will not be water-soluble and will
|
||
make the two materials inseparable. This end sheet is expected to be intaglio printed on the
|
||
non-glue side, and consequently may be smoother than the present end sheet. As the glue
|
||
should be in a liquid state and will require clean up of the machine on a daily basis, glue
|
||
should be slow drying. Glue will be applied from a rotary wheel that is immersed in a tank
|
||
and transferred to the back of the inlay-cover material. (113)The glue shall satisfy local
|
||
volatile organic compound regulations and air quality regulations specifically for GPO’s
|
||
book production plant located in Washington DC.
|
||
• Materials described in this section will be used in an UNO machine to adhere the EP
|
||
Book Cover to the end sheet. If the machine should change, the Government will
|
||
notify the Offeror.
|
||
• It is the preference of the Government not to change the current book manufacturing
|
||
process.
|
||
• (114)Adhesives shall not be bundled with EP Book Covers as one item. The
|
||
Government shall have the flexibility to purchase adhesives separately from the EP
|
||
Book Covers.
|
||
• All consumables are to be clean and free of dust, dirt, or other contaminates.
|
||
76
|
||
|
||
• (115)Prices shall include shipping and handling to GPO. The GPO’s EP production
|
||
facility address is:
|
||
GPO Production
|
||
1st and G St. N.E., Platform
|
||
Washington, DC 20401
|
||
Attn: Mr. Mike Emery, 202.512.0625
|
||
C7.6.4 Manufacturing
|
||
(116)The EP Book Cover shall be manufactured to the best of commercial standards and
|
||
practices.
|
||
C7.6.4.1 Standards
|
||
• Certified ISO 9000 V2000.
|
||
• Security policy complies with the Common Criteria EAL4+ (ISO 15408)
|
||
objectives and requirements in a document specified by ISO 17799.
|
||
Documentation must be made available for government review upon request.
|
||
C7.6.4.2 Quality Assurance Provision
|
||
• The Government requires that the manufacturer(s) use the best of commercial
|
||
cleanliness standards. (117)EP Book Covers that do not effectively adhere
|
||
because of inlay manufacturer contamination shall be returned for a full refund or
|
||
replacement, as determined by the Government.
|
||
• Defects, contamination, and other EP Book Cover problems found during the
|
||
random sample quality testing that adversely affect book quality will be
|
||
considered grounds for refund or replacement of said EP Book Covers, as
|
||
determined by the Government.
|
||
C7.6.5 Miscellaneous
|
||
Travel requirements may be identified during the course of the contract. Either the
|
||
Government or the Offeror can identify travel requirements. (118) If the Offeror
|
||
identifies a requirement for travel within the scope of this contract, the Offeror shall
|
||
submit to the Government a request for approval for such travel. (119)The request shall
|
||
include the destination, purpose, number of persons, and rationale. (120)Travel shall be
|
||
reimbursed on an actual expenditure basis in accordance with Federal Travel Regulations
|
||
and MMAR 31.2. There will be no reimbursement for local travel.
|
||
(121)The Offeror shall disclose any potential requirements for specialized and/or non-
|
||
COTS hardware, software, and consumable requirements of the proposed EP book cover.
|
||
77
|
||
|
||
(122)The Offeror shall, at the Government’s discretion, supply random quality assurance samples as
|
||
requested from each order over the life of the task/delivery order. Delivery instructions will be provided
|
||
with each request.
|
||
The Government reserves the right to modify the stated EP Book Cover requirements to
|
||
take advantage of technological improvements that enable increased performance or
|
||
capacity. Such improvements may be, but are not limited to, a larger capacity micro-
|
||
coprocessor, increased memory, enhanced security, and secure data update capabilities.
|
||
(123)At such time that the Government exercises this right, the Offeror shall provide
|
||
updated pricing information for the Government’s consideration.
|
||
(124)It is expected that the EP Book Cover sheet Offeror shall specify appropriate
|
||
destruction and disposal methods should the current Passport disposal processes be
|
||
unusable for practical, security or safety reasons.
|
||
C8 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES
|
||
(125)When applicable, the Offeror shall provide items pursuant to the Americans With
|
||
Disabilities Act of 1990, and of the Work Force Investment Act of 1998, (Pub.L. 105-
|
||
220).
|
||
C9 KEY PERSONNEL
|
||
(126)The following are the suggested minimum personnel who shall be designated as
|
||
“key”. (127)The Offeror shall propose appropriate labor categories for these positions.
|
||
The implication of “suggested” is that the Government does not intend to dictate the
|
||
composition of the ideal team to perform this contract.
|
||
Project Manager
|
||
•
|
||
Senior Scientist/Engineer, “Adhesives Expert”
|
||
•
|
||
(128)Key personnel shall be assigned for the duration of this contract, but may be
|
||
replaced or removed subject to Section H.8.4 Contractor Substitution of Personnel and
|
||
H.8.5 Unsatisfactory Performance by Contractor Personnel of the basic contract.
|
||
C9.1 Project Manager
|
||
Description: Maintains the project schedule and ensures that deliverables are completed
|
||
in timely manner. Oversees project cost control and cost projections. Knowledgeable in
|
||
the use of the project management tools used for activity assignment, resource planning,
|
||
and cost control. Ensures the invoicing process provides the proper information and
|
||
distribution on the invoices. Ensures smooth coordination consistent with this contract
|
||
and task order procedures for the key personnel approval, consent to subcontract as well
|
||
as consent to purchase travel, tools and other direct costs. Ensures problem resolution
|
||
and customer satisfaction for individual task orders.
|
||
78
|
||
|
||
General Experience: Ten (10) years progressive Information Technology (IT) experience
|
||
including at least six (6) projects in technical areas included in Section C. At least one (1)
|
||
project must have occurred within the past three (3) years.
|
||
Specialized Experience: Eight (8) years in supervision of substantial IT projects. Five (5)
|
||
years of this experience must have been in supervising large IT services contracts,
|
||
including people of various job categories and skills and must have occurred in the last
|
||
ten (10) years.
|
||
Minimum Education: Master’s Degree
|
||
C9.2 Senior Scientist/Engineer
|
||
Description: Performs high-level systems analysis, evaluation, design, integration,
|
||
documentation, and implementation of very complex applications, which require a
|
||
thorough knowledge of administrative and technical skills. Directs and participates in all
|
||
phases of system development with emphasis on planning, analysis, evaluation,
|
||
integration, testing and acceptance phases (IV&V and DT&E). Applies higher-level
|
||
business or technical principles and methods to very difficult technical problems to arrive
|
||
at automated engineering solution. Designs and prepares technical reports and related
|
||
documentation, and makes charts and graphs to record results. Prepare and deliver
|
||
presentations and briefings as required. May be required to serve as Task Leader.
|
||
Responsible for ensuring the quality and services delivered for particular task(s) for which
|
||
this skill is performing the Task Leader position.
|
||
General Experience: Seven (7) years progressive Information Technology (IT)
|
||
experience including at least five (5) projects in technical areas included in Section C. At
|
||
least one (1) project must have occurred within the past three (3) years.
|
||
Specialized Experience: Two (2) years in supervision of substantial IT projects. One (1)
|
||
year of this experience must have been in supervising large IT services contracts,
|
||
including people of various job categories and skills and must have occurred in the last
|
||
five (5) years.
|
||
Minimum Education: Master’s Degree
|
||
C9.3 Senior Scientist/Engineer “Adhesive Expert”
|
||
Description: Top level technical expert in materials (especially adhesives) supporting
|
||
GPO and DoS/CA. Works with both groups to solve adhesive problems. Has high level
|
||
of diverse technical experience related to the use of adhesives. Typically has
|
||
specialization adhering materials related to inlay materials. Knowledgeable in
|
||
technological developments and applications.
|
||
79
|
||
|
||
Experience: Ten (10) years progressive experience including at least six (6) projects in
|
||
technical areas included in Section C. At least one (1) project must have occurred within
|
||
the past three (3) years.
|
||
Minimum Education: Master’s Degree in Material Science and Engineering with formal
|
||
training in the following areas: Organic Chemistry, Adhesion Science (i.e. the knowledge
|
||
of the molecular forces that promote bonding dissimilar materials), knowledge of testing
|
||
methodologies that evaluate adhesive strength and general knowledge of materials
|
||
involved with the products involved in this RFP. Must also have knowledge of chemical
|
||
effect and of chemicals and mechanical forces.
|
||
C9.4 Journeyman Scientist/Engineer
|
||
Description: Performs assigned portions of engineering/scientific projects such as
|
||
analysis, design, integration, applications which require a thorough knowledge of higher
|
||
mathematics and related engineering/scientific skills and knowledge. Participates in all
|
||
phases of scientific & engineering projects such as design, development, testing, training
|
||
and documentation. May have responsibility for assisting in planning and have individual
|
||
responsibility for portions of an engineering/scientific project. Has a working knowledge
|
||
of ISO 7810; ISO 14443 1 - 4; ISO10373 parts 1, 2, 3, 6; ISO 15408 Common Criteria;
|
||
ISO 17799; ISO 7816; and ISO 7810. Knowledge and use of the ICAO standards for ID-1
|
||
antenna array and its capacities.
|
||
General Experience: Five (5) years of progressive Information Technology (IT)
|
||
experience including at least three (3) projects in technical areas included in Section C.
|
||
At least one (1) project must have occurred within the past (3) years.
|
||
Minimum Education: Bachelor’s degree.
|
||
C9.4 Software Systems Engineer
|
||
Description: Formulates/defines specifications for complex software programming
|
||
applications or modifies/maintains complex existing applications using engineering
|
||
releases and utilities from the manufacturer. Responsible for program design, coding,
|
||
testing, debugging and documentation. Usually responsible for applications dealing with
|
||
the overall operation system, such as sophisticated file maintenance routines, large
|
||
telecommunications networks, computer accounting and advanced
|
||
mathematical/scientific software packages. Has full technical knowledge of all phases of
|
||
software systems programming applications. Also has duties instructing, directing and
|
||
checking the work of other operating systems programming personnel. Responsible for
|
||
quality assurance review and the evaluation of new and existing software products.
|
||
General Experience: Ten (10) years progressive Information Technology (IT) experience
|
||
including at least six (6) projects in technical areas included in Section C. At least one (1)
|
||
project must have occurred within the past three (3) years.
|
||
Minimum Education: Master’s Degree
|
||
80
|
||
|
||
APPENDIX A Electronic Passport (EP) Concept of Operations
|
||
See File: EP Abstract Concept of Operations
|
||
81
|
||
|
||
APPENDIX B EP Book Cover Material Specification
|
||
See File: EP Book Cover Specs
|
||
82
|
||
|
||
APPENDIX C Sizing Specification for EP Cover
|
||
See File: GPO RFP Cover Sizing
|
||
83
|
||
|
||
APPENDIX D Characteristics for Reader/Writers for Personalization
|
||
System Test Kit
|
||
See File: Characteristics for Reader/Writers for Personalization System Test Kit
|
||
84
|
||
|
||
APPENDIX E Glossary
|
||
See file: Glossary
|
||
85
|
||
|
||
SECTION - I - CONTRACT CLAUSES
|
||
REGULATIONS GOVERNING PROCUREMENT
|
||
The U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO) is a legislative branch of the United States
|
||
Government. Accordingly, the Materials Management Acquisition Regulations (MMAR) is
|
||
applicable to this, and all GPO procurements. However, the text of certain provisions of the FAR,
|
||
as contained in the Code of Federal Regulations, are referenced in this solicitation. The bidder
|
||
should note that only those provisions of the FAR which are specifically incorporated by reference
|
||
into this solicitation, are applicable.
|
||
NOTICE LISTING CONTRACT CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
|
||
The following contract clauses pertinent to this section are hereby incorporated by reference in
|
||
accordance with the MMAR clause at "52.252-2 CLAUSE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
|
||
(FEB 1998) Section I of this contract.
|
||
The following provisions are incorporated by reference, with the same force and effect as if they
|
||
were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available.
|
||
MMAR changes apply to solicitation issued on or after the effective date of the change.
|
||
Also, the full text of a clause may be accessed electronically at this address
|
||
www.gpo.gov
|
||
NUMBER DATE TITLE
|
||
52.202-1 Dec 2001 Definitions
|
||
Regulations Governing Procurement
|
||
52.203-3 Apr 1984 Gratuities
|
||
52.203-5 Apr 1984 Covenant Against Contingent Fees
|
||
52.203-6 Jul 1995 Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government
|
||
American Made Products
|
||
52.203-7 Jul 1995 Anti-Kickback Procedures
|
||
52.203-8 Jan 1997 Cancellation, Rescission, and Recovery of Funds for Illegal or
|
||
Improper Activity
|
||
52.203-10 Jan 1997 Price or Fee Adjustment for Illegal or Improper Activity
|
||
52.209-6 Jul 1995 Protecting the Government's Interest when Subcontracting
|
||
With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for
|
||
Debarment
|
||
52.214-29 Jan 1986 Order of Precedence--Sealed Bidding
|
||
52.215-1 May 2001 Instruction to Offerors - Competitive Acquisition
|
||
52.222-1 Feb 1997 Notice to the Government of Labor Disputes
|
||
52.222-3 Aug 1996 Convict Labor
|
||
52.222-4 Sep 2000 Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act--Overtime
|
||
Compensation
|
||
52.222-20 Dec 1996 Walsh-Healy Public Contracts Act
|
||
52.222-26 Apr 2000 Equal Opportunity
|
||
52.222-35 Dec 2001 Employment Reports on Special Disabled Veterans and
|
||
Veterans of the Vietnam Era and
|
||
other Eligible Veterans
|
||
52.222-36 Jun 1998 Affirmative Action for Handicapped Workers
|
||
52.222-37 Jan 1999 Employment Reports on Special Disabled Veterans and
|
||
Veterans of the Vietnam Era
|
||
52.223-3 Jan 1997 Hazardous Material Identification and Material Safety Data
|
||
52.227-1 Jul 1995 Authorization and Consent
|
||
86
|
||
|
||
52.227-2 Aug 1996 Notice and Assistance Regarding Patent and Copyright
|
||
Infringement
|
||
52.227-3 Apr 1984 Patent Indemnity
|
||
52.229-3 Jan 1991 Federal, State, and Local Taxes
|
||
52.229-5 Apr 1984 Taxes--Contracts Performed in U.S. Possessions or Puerto Rico
|
||
52.232-1 Apr 1984 Payments
|
||
52.232-11 Apr 1984 Extras
|
||
52.232-17 Jun 1996 Interest
|
||
52.232-23 Jan 1986 Assignment of Claims
|
||
52.233-3 Aug 1996 Protest After Award
|
||
52.242-13 Jul 1995 Bankruptcy
|
||
52.243-1 Aug 1997 Changes--Fixed Price
|
||
52.246-2 Aug 1996 Inspection of Supplies--Fixed Price
|
||
NUMBER DATE TITLE
|
||
52.246-16 Apr 1984 Responsibility for Supplies
|
||
52.247-64 Jun 2000 Preference for Privately Owned U.S. Flag Commercial Vessels
|
||
52.249-1 Apr 1984 Termination for Convenience of the Government (Fixed Price)
|
||
(Short Form)
|
||
52.249-2 Sep 1996 Termination for Convenience of the Government (Fixed Price)
|
||
52.249-8 Apr 1984 Default (Fixed-Price Supply and Service)
|
||
552-203-71 Sep 1999 Restriction on Advertising
|
||
552.211.72 Feb 1996 References to Specifications in Drawings
|
||
552.211-73 Feb 1996 Marking
|
||
552.211.74 Feb 1996 Charges for Marking
|
||
552.211-75 Feb 1996 Preservation, Packaging and Packing
|
||
552.211-77 Feb 1996 Packing List
|
||
552.211-82 Feb 1996 Availability for Inspection Testing, and Shipment/Delivery –
|
||
Notice of Shipment
|
||
552.223-72 Sep 1999 Hazardous Material Information
|
||
552.243-70 Apr 1989 Pricing of Adjustments
|
||
552.253-6 Sep 1999 Authorized Deviations or Variations in Clauses
|
||
87
|
||
|
||
SECTION - I - CONTRACT CLAUSES (Continued)
|
||
DISPUTES (VARIATION)
|
||
Except as otherwise provided in the contract, any dispute concerning a question of fact related to
|
||
the contract which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Contracting Officer,
|
||
who shall make his/her decision in writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy thereof to the
|
||
Contractor. The decision of the Contracting Officer shall be final and conclusive unless, within 90
|
||
days from the date of receipt of such copy, the Contractor mails or otherwise furnishes to the
|
||
Contracting Officer a written appeal addressed to the Public Printer. The decision of the Public
|
||
Printer, or a duly authorized representative for the determination of such appeals, shall be final
|
||
and conclusive unless determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to have been fraudulent, or
|
||
capricious, or arbitrary, or so grossly erroneous as necessarily to imply bad faith, or not supported
|
||
by substantial evidence. In connection with any appeal under this article, the Contractor shall be
|
||
afforded an opportunity to be heard and to bid evidence in support of his/her appeal. Pending
|
||
final decision of a dispute hereunder, the Contractor shall proceed diligently with the performance
|
||
of the contract and in accordance with the Contracting Officer's decision.
|
||
This "Disputes" article does not preclude consideration of law questions in connection with
|
||
decisions provided for in the paragraph above: Provided, that nothing in the contract shall be
|
||
construed as making final the decision of any administration official, representative, or board on a
|
||
question of law.
|
||
SERVICE OF PROTEST (VARIATION)
|
||
(a) Protests, as defined in Section 33.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, that are
|
||
filed directly with an agency, and copies of any protests that are filed with the General Accounting
|
||
Office (GAO) shall be served on the Contracting Officer (addressed as follows) by obtaining
|
||
written and dated acknowledgment of receipt from Director, Materials Management Service, U.S.
|
||
GPO, (MM), Washington, DC 20401.
|
||
(b) The copy of any protest shall be received in the office designated above within
|
||
one day of filing protest with GAO.
|
||
PROTEST AFTER AWARD (AUG 1996)
|
||
(a) Upon receipt of a notice of protest (as defined in 33.101 of the FAR) the Contracting
|
||
Officer may, by written order to the Contractor, direct the Contractor to stop performance of work
|
||
called for by this contract. The order shall be specifically identified as a stop-work order issued
|
||
under this clause. Upon receipt of the order, the Contractor shall immediately comply with its
|
||
terms and take all reasonable steps to minimize the incurrence of costs allocable to the work
|
||
covered by the order during the period of work stoppage. Upon receipt of the final decision in the
|
||
protest, the Contracting Officer shall either--
|
||
(1) Cancel the stop-work; or
|
||
(2) Terminate the work covered by the order as provided in the Default or the
|
||
Termination for Convenience of the Government, clause of this contract.
|
||
(b) If a stop-work order issued under this clause is canceled either before or after a final
|
||
decision in the protest, the Contractor shall resume work. The Contracting Officer shall make an
|
||
equitable adjustment in the delivery schedule or contract price, or both, and the contract shall be
|
||
modified, in writing, accordingly, if--
|
||
(1) The stop-work order results in an increase in the time required for, or in the
|
||
Contractor's cost properly allocable to, the performance of any part of this contract; and
|
||
(2) The Contractor asserts its right to an adjustment within 30 days after the end
|
||
of the period of work stoppage; provided, that if the Contracting Officer decides the facts
|
||
justify the action, the Contracting Officer may receive and act upon the request at any
|
||
time before final payment under this contract.
|
||
(c) If a stop-work order is not canceled and the work covered by the order is terminated
|
||
for the convenience of the Government, the Contracting Officer shall allow reasonable costs
|
||
resulting from the stop-work order in arriving at the termination settlement.
|
||
(d) If a stop-work order is not canceled and the work covered by the order is terminated
|
||
for default, the Contracting Officer shall allow, by equitable adjustment or otherwise, reasonable
|
||
costs resulting from the stop-work order.
|
||
(e) The Government's right to terminate this contract at anytime are not affected by action
|
||
taken under this clause.
|
||
88
|
||
|
||
Section J – Attachments
|
||
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE (U.S. GPO)
|
||
Attachments
|
||
ELECTRONIC (INTEGRATED CIRCUIT (IC) EMBEDDED) PASSPORT
|
||
COVERS
|
||
ATTACHMENT 1: PRIME, EP BOOK COVER SHEET, AND INLAY PRODUCTION
|
||
FACILITY RELATED SECURITY REQUIREMENTS..............Error! Bookmark not defined.
|
||
ATTACHMENT 2: IC CHIP PRODUCTION FACILITY SECURITY
|
||
REQUIREMENTS.........................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
|
||
ATTACHMENT 3: ELECTRONIC PASSPORT (EP) Inlay AND EP BOOK COVER
|
||
SHEET PRODUCTION FACILITY SECURITY REQUIREMENTSError! Bookmark not defined.
|
||
ATTACHMENT 4: TEST REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST TO BE SUBMITTED BY
|
||
OFFEROR AS PART OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL........Error! Bookmark not defined.
|
||
ATTACHMENT 5: PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY..............Error! Bookmark not defined.
|
||
INSTRUCTIONS:.............................................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
|
||
EXAMPLE LETTER FOR PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY.................Error! Bookmark not defined.
|
||
PAST PERFORMACE SURVEY...................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
|
||
89
|
||
|
||
ATTACHMENT 1: PRIME, EP BOOK COVER SHEET, AND INLAY
|
||
PRODUCTION FACILITY RELATED SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
|
||
This contract does not require access to U.S. Government classified information;
|
||
however, it does require diligence on the part of Offerors to provide adequate and
|
||
appropriate controls over the security of the production facilities that will produce the
|
||
Electronic Passport (EP) inlays and the EP Book Cover Sheets that will be manufactured
|
||
under the terms of the contract as well as the employees who will work in areas of
|
||
production, inventory control, shipping, quality control, distribution and accounting for
|
||
products and components in the aforementioned areas. The term “contractors” used
|
||
herein refers to the Prime Contractor (contract awardee), the EP inlay manufacturer and
|
||
the EP Book Cover Sheet manufacturer.
|
||
The Government Printing Office (GPO) and the Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS),
|
||
U.S. Department of State, reserve the right and authority to conduct periodic inspections
|
||
of contractor facilities and to perform background investigations on the company and its
|
||
management in terms of its affiliations with persons or organizations that are inimical to
|
||
the security interests of the United States, as well as background investigations of
|
||
company employees and inspection of contractor facilities that are necessary to ensure
|
||
proper compliance with the terms of the contract. The particular area of security interest
|
||
under this contract relates to the manufacturing facilities and its employees who will be
|
||
involved in the fabrication of offered inlays and/or the fabrication of those inlays into the
|
||
offered passport cover material. Those facilities and employees require security
|
||
investigations and inspections. Specifically, the USG is interested in the security of
|
||
facilities and employees working at production facilities where inlays are assembled
|
||
and/or where inlays are joined to the cover material in the form of the final book cover
|
||
deliverable. It is not the intention of the GPO or DS to monitor and inspect the facilities
|
||
and employees of chip and antenna suppliers or inlay substrate provides that will provide
|
||
commercially offered chip and antenna components and inlay substrates to fabricators of
|
||
the inlays or the fabricators of inlays and cover material. It is expected that chip,
|
||
antenna, adhesive, reader, and inlay substrate providers will provide proper security
|
||
controls and accountability of their product and components in terms of accepted industry
|
||
standards for those products and components. The successful firm(s) will be required to
|
||
meet the following security specifications:
|
||
I. U.S. Firms
|
||
A. Facility Security Requirements for U.S. Firms
|
||
(l) A U.S. firm which possesses a Secret facility security clearance
|
||
issued by the Defense Security Service (DSS) in accordance with the
|
||
National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) meets
|
||
the security requirements for the contractor facilities described above.
|
||
(2) A U.S. firm which does not possess a Secret facility security
|
||
clearance issued by DSS will be required to comply with the following:
|
||
90
|
||
|
||
a) The contractor must be organized and existing under the laws of
|
||
any of the fifty states, the District of Columbia, or Puerto Rico, and
|
||
be located in the U.S. and its territorial areas or possessions.
|
||
b) The contractor must have a reputation for integrity and lawful
|
||
conduct in its business dealings. The contractor and its key
|
||
managers must not be barred from participating in U.S.
|
||
Government contracts.
|
||
c) The contractor shall provide appropriate information to DS to
|
||
enable DS to conduct a Facility National Agency Check.
|
||
d) The contractor must not be under foreign ownership, control or
|
||
influence (FOCI) to such a degree that contract performance would
|
||
be inconsistent with the national interest. The contractor shall
|
||
complete a SF 328, Certificate Pertaining to Foreign Interests, so
|
||
DS can evaluate any Foreign Ownership, Control or Influence
|
||
(FOCI).
|
||
e) Specifically designated key management officials will be
|
||
required to complete Standard Forms 85P and 85PS and
|
||
appropriate fingerprint cards so DS can conduct a National Agency
|
||
Check, Local Agency Check, and credit check (NACLC).
|
||
Personal interviews of the individuals will also be conducted if
|
||
deemed necessary by the Bureau of Diplomatic Security. The
|
||
officials must favorably pass the NACLC and be determined
|
||
eligible for a moderate risk public trust position.
|
||
f) If the contractor is part of a multiple facility organization, the
|
||
home office facility must meet the above security requirements for
|
||
contractor facilities.
|
||
g) If the contractor is part of a parent-subsidiary relationship, the
|
||
parent and subsidiary must meet the above security requirements
|
||
for contractor facilities, unless DS determines excluding the parent
|
||
from this process is consistent with the National interest.
|
||
B. Personnel security investigations of contractor personnel (other than key
|
||
management officials) employed by U.S. Firms
|
||
Following are personnel security investigative requirements for contractor
|
||
personnel who are involved in the:
|
||
(1) Management, design, production, spoilage, control and distribution of U.S.
|
||
passport book covers and inlay documents;
|
||
91
|
||
|
||
(2) Enforcement of the security plan for ensuring secure manufacturing, storage and
|
||
shipment of book covers and inlays materials
|
||
a) Contractor personnel who possess Secret personnel security
|
||
clearances issued by the Defense Security Service (DSS) meet this
|
||
requirement.
|
||
b) Contractor personnel who do not possess Secret security
|
||
clearances issued by DSS must be screened by their employers and
|
||
approved by DS prior to contract performance. They will be
|
||
required to submit the following completed documentation for
|
||
each contractor employee. DS reserves the right and authority to
|
||
conduct any additional investigations as they deem necessary to
|
||
determine eligibility for contract performance
|
||
• Standard Form 85P (Questionnaire for Public Trust Positions)
|
||
• Standard Form 85P-S (Supplemental Questionnaire for
|
||
Selected Positions)
|
||
• FD-258 Fingerprint cards (two each, per person) (provided by
|
||
DOS)
|
||
• DS-4002 (Disclosure and Authorization Pertaining to
|
||
Consumer Reports Pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act)
|
||
(provided by DS)
|
||
In addition to the forms cited in b). above, the results of the company’s screening
|
||
and selection process (see section III) must be submitted to DS for all personnel, other
|
||
than key management personnel, to be assigned to the contract. Approvals granted by DS
|
||
are valid for five years. All personnel performing on the contract requiring such approval
|
||
will need to re-submit necessary paperwork 30 days prior to the expiration date of the
|
||
approval for continuous uninterrupted performance on the contract. At this time, the
|
||
contractor will be required to submit appropriate documentation to allow DS to determine
|
||
continued eligibility for contract performance An unfavorable result of this check may
|
||
require the contractor employee to be removed from their position pending re-
|
||
adjudication of the approval..
|
||
Deliveries made by FedEx/UPS/DHL/or other express courier (do not send
|
||
anything via the US Postal Service) should be sent to:
|
||
Department of State
|
||
Attn: Ms. Glenn Chilton
|
||
DS/IS/IND, 13th Floor
|
||
1801 North Lynn Street
|
||
Arlington, VA 22209
|
||
92
|
||
|
||
Upon receipt in DS, the package will be forwarded to DS/SI/PSS to conduct any
|
||
additional investigations and determining eligibility for contract performance.
|
||
DS’s determination of eligibility or ineligibility for contract performance will be
|
||
provided to the Contracting Officer’s Representative and Facility Security
|
||
Officer. If an unfavorable determination is made, the contractor employee will
|
||
not be authorized to perform on the contract.
|
||
II. Foreign Firms
|
||
A. Facility Security Requirements for Foreign Firms
|
||
(l) A foreign firm must not be under foreign ownership, control or influence
|
||
(FOCI) by another foreign entity to such a degree that contract performance would be
|
||
inconsistent with the U.S. Government's National interest. Foreign firms must execute
|
||
forms similar to the U.S. Government's Certificate Pertaining to Foreign Interests, SF
|
||
328, so the U.S. Government can evaluate any foreign ownership, control or influence.
|
||
(2) A foreign firm incorporated and operating in a country with which the U.S.
|
||
has an industrial security agreement and which possesses a facility security clearance
|
||
issued by their parent government meets the facility security requirements. This facility
|
||
security clearance must be certified to the U.S. Government by the foreign government.
|
||
The U.S. government also reserves the right to conduct other appropriate local checks
|
||
consistent with U.S. national interest.
|
||
(3) Other foreign firms will be subjected to, as a minimum, the following
|
||
investigative inquiries by the American Embassy located in the host country:
|
||
Specifically designated key management officials will be required to complete
|
||
the following to permit appropriate background investigations as deemed
|
||
necessary by DS:
|
||
• Completed Standard Form 85P - (Questionnaire for Public Trust
|
||
Positions)
|
||
• Completed Standard Form 85P-S - (Supplemental Questionnaire for
|
||
Selected Positions)
|
||
• FD-258 Fingerprint cards (two each, per person) - (provided by DS)
|
||
• DS-4002 (Disclosure and Authorization Pertaining to Consumer Reports
|
||
Pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act) (provided by DS)
|
||
b) A personal interview by the Regional Security Officer (RSO) or
|
||
Post Security Officer (PSO)
|
||
c) Appropriate host government and post records checks
|
||
d) Local police checks
|
||
93
|
||
|
||
e) Verification of personal data
|
||
f) Verification of educational and professional qualifications or trade
|
||
certification or accreditation
|
||
g) Assessment of performance, reliability and integrity by checking with
|
||
previous customers and identified references
|
||
h) Determination of any pending legal actions against the contractor
|
||
(4) The contractor must have a reputation for integrity and lawful conduct in its
|
||
business dealings. The contractor and its key managers must not be barred from
|
||
participating in its Government contracts.
|
||
(5) Additionally, the U.S. Government reserves the right to request that the
|
||
contractor's government provide a security assurance of the firm.
|
||
B. Personnel security investigations of contractor personnel (other than key
|
||
management officials) employed by foreign firms
|
||
(l) Following are personnel security investigative requirements for key foreign
|
||
national contractor employees assigned to this contract who are involved in the:
|
||
a) Management, design, production, control and distribution of U.S. passport
|
||
document book covers and inlays ;
|
||
b) The control and distribution of passport book covers and inlays ; and
|
||
c) Enforcement of the security plan for ensuring secure manufacture, storage and
|
||
shipment of materials
|
||
The personnel will be required to complete the following and forward the forms
|
||
to DS:
|
||
• Standard Form 85P (Questionnaire for Public Trust Positions)
|
||
• Standard Form 85P-S (Supplemental Questionnaire for Selected Positions)
|
||
• FD-258 Fingerprint cards (two each, per person) (provided by DOS)
|
||
• DS-4002 (Disclosure and Authorization Pertaining to Consumer Reports
|
||
Pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act) (provided by DS)
|
||
The contractor is required to conduct screening as cited in Section III and provide
|
||
those results to the Regional Security Officer (RSO) in the appropriate country.
|
||
The RSO reserves the right and the authority to confirm those checks by
|
||
conducting the following:
|
||
(a) A personal interview by the RSO or PSO
|
||
94
|
||
|
||
(b) Appropriate host government and post records checks
|
||
(c) Verification of personal data
|
||
(d) Foreign government records of individuals who have an affiliation with
|
||
subversive activities)
|
||
(e)Verification of educational and professional qualifications or
|
||
trade certification or accreditation
|
||
(f) Assessment of performance and reliability by checking with previous employers
|
||
and identified references
|
||
(g) A credit check
|
||
A review of records of appropriate agencies at the U.S. Embassy (RSO, LEGATT, DEA,
|
||
Customs, MLCO)
|
||
After successful completion of the checks conducted of the firm and the
|
||
designated employees, the RSO or PSO will issue appropriate security certifications.
|
||
Those security certifications are valid for five years. All personnel performing on this
|
||
contract will be required to re-submit necessary investigative paperwork 30 days prior to
|
||
their five year anniversary date for continuous uninterrupted performance on this
|
||
contract. At this time, another security investigation will be conducted by the RSO. An
|
||
unfavorable result of this check will require the contractor employee to be removed from
|
||
their position at no cost to the United States Government.
|
||
In addition to the forms cited below, the results of the company’s screening
|
||
process (see section III) must be submitted to DS for all personnel to be assigned to the
|
||
contract (other than key management personnel.
|
||
III. CONTRACTOR SCREENING AND SELECTION PROCESS
|
||
The contractor shall screen their employees in accordance with the following criteria and
|
||
provide those results to DS at the address in I. B above.
|
||
SSCCRREEEENNIINNGG SSEELLEECCTTIIOONN PPRROOCCEESSSS
|
||
1 Resume Received, Reviewed for 1 Background investigation initiated:
|
||
completeness: − Multiple calls / call backs
|
||
− Incomplete packages not − Interviews conducted
|
||
reviewed and are not placed in − Performance evaluations
|
||
tracking database reviewed
|
||
− Complete packages - placed in − Biographies written
|
||
95
|
||
|
||
SSCCRREEEENNIINNGG SSEELLEECCTTIIOONN PPRROOCCEESSSS
|
||
tracking database − Driving records
|
||
− Interview personal references
|
||
− Credit history
|
||
− Civil / criminal records check
|
||
NOTE: Background investigations
|
||
performed by outside firms such as
|
||
ChoicePoint, Kroll, James E. Van Ella
|
||
& Associates are acceptable. (The
|
||
contractor is not obligated to use these
|
||
vendors)
|
||
2. Qualifications reviewed: 2. Quality review of investigation by
|
||
− Special skills identified contractor
|
||
− If qualified, data entered into
|
||
database
|
||
3. Applicant sent packet 3. Medical, dental exams and drug
|
||
screening results returned and reviewed
|
||
by doctor, failures are rejected.
|
||
Screening is completed
|
||
4. Financial and criminal records 5.
|
||
checked
|
||
− Approved / disapproved
|
||
− Selection process continued for
|
||
approved personnel
|
||
6. Candidate is notified of acceptance and
|
||
orientation / evaluation dates
|
||
7. Synopsis of investigation and all
|
||
documentation forwarded to DS after all
|
||
requirements have been met..
|
||
The above requirements apply to the prime contractor and any sub-contractors that are
|
||
involved in the production/fabrication of offered inlays and book covers that include
|
||
embedded inlays.
|
||
96
|
||
|
||
ATTACHMENT 2: IC CHIP PRODUCTION FACILITY SECURITY
|
||
REQUIREMENTS
|
||
(It is the Government’s intent that the ICs to be used in the EP inlay shall be manufactured, stored and
|
||
shipped in accordance with international standard security requirements for secure Smart Card
|
||
applications. This attachment summarizes those requirements.)
|
||
The Offeror shall provide a secure production facility for the fabrication, storage and
|
||
transport of the IC Chip to be embedded in the EP Book Cover Sheet. The facility must
|
||
meet the following requirements that will be verified by preliminary and ongoing site
|
||
inspections by GPO or designates.
|
||
• The Facility shall have guard(s) on duty, twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days
|
||
a week.
|
||
• The facility shall have duress alarms strategically placed (including vaults)
|
||
throughout the facility along with motion detectors and emergency door alarms that
|
||
are monitored by an alarm company.
|
||
• The facility shall provide 24 hour controlled access to secured production and storage
|
||
areas. Preference is for electronic access control mechanisms that control and record
|
||
access to secure areas by entry location and time periods. Procedures shall be in
|
||
place so employees are monitored, and rejected attempts into area not assigned are
|
||
investigated to determine the reason for the attempt into an unauthorized area.
|
||
• There shall be a system in place, which only admits one authorized employee at a
|
||
time (i.e. mantrap type door).
|
||
• There shall be adequate color closed circuit TV (CCTV) cameras located inside and
|
||
outside of the facility. All videotapes must be retained for three (3) months.
|
||
• All visitors shall be required to provide picture identification and sign the visitor’s
|
||
register prior to entry into the facility. The visitor must be escorted at all times by a
|
||
company employee.
|
||
• Visitors not associated with the Offeror or an appropriate U.S. Government entity
|
||
shall not be admitted to secure production or storage areas where the deliverables are
|
||
being manufactured under the scope of this procurement without the approval of the
|
||
appropriate U.S. Government entity.
|
||
• No personal items (purses, lunches, coats, cell phones, etc.) in the production areas.
|
||
• The facility must meet the standards specified in C7.7.3.1.
|
||
• All employees working on this procurement shall have had a background
|
||
investigation, been fingerprinted, photographed, and have passed a credit check.
|
||
• The appropriate U.S. Government entity will periodically inspect the production
|
||
facilities by on-site visits.
|
||
• In addition, the security policy must address such items as:
|
||
o Trusted Physical working areas
|
||
o Material & asset identification
|
||
o Secure Storage
|
||
o Access control & monitored environment and Individual Identification &
|
||
Authentication
|
||
o Secure site information system as well as access control & password
|
||
97
|
||
|
||
Management
|
||
o Information & material protection and scrap management
|
||
o Safe transport of all goods and materials
|
||
o Trusted human resource management
|
||
o External (customer & Offeror) accreditation
|
||
98
|
||
|
||
ATTACHMENT 3: ELECTRONIC PASSPORT (EP) Inlay AND EP BOOK
|
||
COVER SHEET PRODUCTION FACILITY SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
|
||
(It is the Government’s intent that the EP inlay and the EP Book Cover Sheet shall satisfy the following US
|
||
Government security requirements for production facilities of critical and accountable components of the
|
||
US Passport.)
|
||
The Contractor shall provide a secure production facility for the fabrication, storage and
|
||
transport of the offered U.S. passport inlays and cover material with embedded inlays.
|
||
The facility must meet the following minimum requirements that will be verified by
|
||
preliminary and ongoing site inspections by the Government Printing Office (GPO) and
|
||
the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, U.S. Department of State (DS).
|
||
• The Facility shall have uniformed guard(s) on duty, twenty-four (24) hours a day,
|
||
seven (7) days a week.
|
||
• The facility shall have duress alarms strategically placed (including vaults)
|
||
throughout the facility along with passive infrared motion sensors providing intrusion
|
||
detection capability throughout the facility. All doors and windows will be alarmed
|
||
with balanced magnetic switch contacts and monitored 24/7 by an accredited local
|
||
alarm company.
|
||
• The facility shall provide 24-hour automated access control to all secure production
|
||
and storage areas. Preference is for electronic, automated access control mechanisms
|
||
that control and record access to secure areas by entry location and time periods.
|
||
Procedures shall be in place so all access attempts are monitored, and rejected
|
||
attempts are recorded and investigated to determine the reasons for unauthorized
|
||
access attempts to a restricted area.
|
||
• There shall be a system and entry design in place, which only admits one authorized
|
||
employee at a time (i.e. mantrap type door) to restricted production and storage areas.
|
||
• There shall be adequate color closed circuit TV (CCTV) cameras located inside and
|
||
outside the facility, recording on a continual 24/7 basis. Full perimeter CCTV
|
||
coverage is required, to include all entry/exit gates, and all perimeter entry/exit doors
|
||
and loading docks. All videotapes/hard drives must be retained for a minimum of
|
||
three (3) months. Digital Video Recording (DVR) devices are preferred over
|
||
conventional VCR CCTV recording.
|
||
• All visitors shall be required to provide picture identification and sign a visitor’s
|
||
registry log prior to entry into the facility. Visitors must be escorted at all times by a
|
||
cleared company employee.
|
||
• The Contractor shall ensure that visitors not associated with the Contractor. The GPO,
|
||
or the U.S. Department of State will not be admitted to secure production or storage
|
||
areas where the deliverables are being manufactured under the scope of this
|
||
procurement without prior approval of the U.S. Department of State.
|
||
• No personal items (purses, lunches, coats, cell phones, pagers, laptops, etc.) will be
|
||
allowed in the secure production and storage areas.
|
||
• The facility must meet the standards specified in C7.7.3.1???.
|
||
• All contractor employees performing on this contract must meet wit personnel
|
||
security investigative requirements specified in Section _______.
|
||
99
|
||
|
||
• The GPO and DS reserve the right to periodically inspect the contractor production
|
||
and storage facilities by on-site visits—announced or unannounced.
|
||
• The Offeror is responsible for submitting a comprehensive security plan to the GPO
|
||
and DS detailing exactly how it will meet all physical, procedural and industrial
|
||
security requirements listed in this RFP prior to award of contract.
|
||
• In addition, the manufacturer’s security policy must address such items as:
|
||
o Trusted Physical working areas
|
||
o Material & asset identification
|
||
o Secure Storage
|
||
o Access control & monitored environment and Individual Identification &
|
||
Authentication
|
||
o Secure site information system as well as access control & password
|
||
management
|
||
o Information & material protection and scrap management
|
||
o Safe transport of all goods and materials
|
||
o Trusted human resource management
|
||
o External (customer & contractor) accreditation
|
||
100
|
||
|
||
ATTACHMENT 4: TEST REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST TO BE SUBMITTED
|
||
BY OFFEROR AS PART OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
|
||
Tests and associated methods and parameters that can be used to provide evidence
|
||
that the Offeror’s product is durable, interoperable and meets the applicable
|
||
standards.
|
||
Chip and Antenna Assembly Testing
|
||
Tests Method Parameter Certification/ Test
|
||
Results that Chip
|
||
and Antenna
|
||
Assembly Passed
|
||
Available(Y/N)
|
||
Temperature IEC 68 parts 2-3 40 degree C; 93 % rel.
|
||
humidity biased humidity; V high;
|
||
cc
|
||
(THB) 168 – 500h
|
||
X-rays ISO 10373 ISO 14443-1
|
||
Magnetic field ISO 10373 ISO 14443-1
|
||
Life test Mil-STD 85 – 125 degrees C V
|
||
cc
|
||
883/1006 = V ; f = Active
|
||
ccmax clk
|
||
Electrostatic ISO 10373-3 10 kV; 100pF; 0.5 k
|
||
discharge (ESD) ohms
|
||
Temperature MIL STD 883- -40 – 125 degrees C
|
||
cycling 1010
|
||
100 cycles/0.5 h
|
||
Write/read cycles 100,000
|
||
Alternating
|
||
ISO 14443-1
|
||
electric fields
|
||
101
|
||
|
||
ATTACHMENT 5: PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
|
||
TO BE COMPLETED AND RETURNED BY OFFEROR’S CLIENT
|
||
INSTRUCTIONS:
|
||
The following questions are to be used to evaluate the performance record of an Offeror
|
||
submitting a proposal in response to the RFP issued by GPO, ______. Please complete
|
||
this Past Performance Questionnaire and return to: GPO, _____ on or before
|
||
___[date]_____. Your responses to this questionnaire will be considered confidential.
|
||
Responses returned by contractors will not be used in the Performance Record
|
||
evaluation. For the purposes of this survey “Contractor” refers to the specific contractor
|
||
that requested you to provide this information to the Government.
|
||
For each of the following areas, rate the performance of the Contractor as:
|
||
(a) Exceptional; (b) Very Good; (c) Satisfactory; (d) Marginal; (e) Unsatisfactory; (f) Not
|
||
Applicable, Yes or No. Indicate your rating by inserting the appropriate letter for the
|
||
response.
|
||
Include a narrative explanation whenever you feel that it is appropriate, but as a
|
||
minimum when a rating of Unsatisfactory is given. The contractor shall be given an
|
||
opportunity to respond to unsatisfactory ratings.
|
||
102
|
||
|
||
EXAMPLE LETTER FOR PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
|
||
103
|
||
|
||
CLIENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER: FORMAT
|
||
[Date of Letter]
|
||
[Name and Address of Client - proposed Offeror’s customer]
|
||
Attention: [Name and Designation of Customer’s Contract Manager or Appropriate Contact
|
||
Personnel]
|
||
Dear [Contact Name]:
|
||
We are currently responding to the Government Printing Office Request for Proposal (RFP) No.
|
||
______. The GPO is procuring services and supplies. The GPO is requesting that clients of
|
||
entities responding to their solicitation be identified and their participation in the evaluation
|
||
process be requested. In the event you are contacted for information on work we have performed,
|
||
you are hereby authorized to respond to those inquiries. Your cooperation with this effort is
|
||
greatly appreciated. Please direct any questions to [Name and Phone Number of Offeror’s Point-
|
||
of-Contact].
|
||
We have included our work for [firm or agency’s name] as a past performance reference. A Past
|
||
Performance Questionnaire is enclosed. Please complete the enclosed evaluation and return the
|
||
signed, completed document to:
|
||
GPO
|
||
Please forward the completed evaluation to GPO ensure they receive it before
|
||
_________DATE_____
|
||
In order to maintain the integrity of this process, please DO NOT return the questionnaire to us.
|
||
Return it to the GPO address listed above. We request that you forward the completed
|
||
questionnaire in an envelope with your logo or stamped return address on it directly to GPO at the
|
||
address above.
|
||
Sincerely,
|
||
[Signature]
|
||
[Name of Signer]
|
||
[Designation of Signer]
|
||
cc: Ms. Broadnax, Contracting Officer, GPO
|
||
104
|
||
|
||
PAST PERFORMACE SURVEY
|
||
105
|
||
|
||
PAST PERFORMACE SURVEY
|
||
CONTRACT INFORMATION
|
||
a. Contractor:
|
||
__________________________________________________
|
||
b. Contract Number:
|
||
__________________________________________________
|
||
c. Type of Contract: (check all that apply)
|
||
i. ( ) Negotiated ( ) Sealed Bidding
|
||
ii. ( ) Competitive ( ) Non-Competitive
|
||
iii. ( ) Firm-Fixed-Price ( ) Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee
|
||
( ) Time-and-Materials ( ) Labor Hour
|
||
( ) Indefinite Quantity ( ) Requirements
|
||
Other: ______________________________
|
||
d. Please complete the following:
|
||
Period or Performance: ______________ to ________________
|
||
Initial Contract Value: $ ________________
|
||
Current (or Completed) Contract Value $ ________________
|
||
e. Brief description of requirement:
|
||
_____________________________________________________________________
|
||
_____________________________________________________________________
|
||
_____________________________________________________________________
|
||
__________________
|
||
f. Complexity of effort: ( ) Difficult ( ) Routine
|
||
_____________________________________________________________________
|
||
_____________________________________________________________________
|
||
_____________________________________________________________________
|
||
__________________
|
||
106
|
||
|
||
Please provide the following information (to assist us in tracking responses received and
|
||
resolving any conflicts in the evaluation process if necessary):
|
||
Name of Evaluator: ______________________________________
|
||
Telephone Number: ______________________________________
|
||
Facsimile Number: ______________________________________
|
||
Organization/Office Symbol: ______________________________
|
||
Mailing Address: ________________________________________
|
||
Position Title/Grade: _____________________________________
|
||
Length of involvement with contract: ________________________
|
||
Degree or extent of involvement with contract: ________________
|
||
Thank you in advance for completing this survey. THIS INFORMATION WILL BE
|
||
PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAR 15.1004 (e).
|
||
SCORING CRITERIA
|
||
EXCEPTIONAL – Indicates the Contractor’s performance within the area of evaluation
|
||
clearly and consistently significantly exceeds contractual requirements.
|
||
GOOD - Indicates the Contractor’s performance within the area of evaluation clearly and
|
||
consistently exceeds contractual requirements
|
||
ACCEPTABLE – Indicates no problems in area of evaluation or has only minor
|
||
problems for which solutions were satisfactory.
|
||
MARGINAL – Indicates problems in area of evaluation for which solutions were
|
||
marginally satisfactory.
|
||
UNACCEPTABLE – Indicates serious problems in the evaluation area. The Contractor
|
||
is/was in danger of being unable to satisfy contractual requirements and timely recovery
|
||
is not likely or did not occur.
|
||
107
|
||
|
||
I. QUALITY OF PRODUCT/SERVICE
|
||
1a. Quality and reliability of delivered equipment
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
1b. Quality of expendable supplies and materials
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
1c. Quality and timeliness of maintenance services performed
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
1d. Quality of technical support provided
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
108
|
||
|
||
II. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
|
||
2a. Ability of Contractor to deliver equipment according to delivery schedule
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
2b. Ability of Contractor to provide sustained on-time delivery of expendable
|
||
supplies and materials.
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
2c. Responsiveness and flexibility in reacting to changes.
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
2d. Responsiveness/capability to meet surge/short term requirements
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
109
|
||
|
||
III. PRICE/COST CONTROL
|
||
3a. Quality, completeness, and accuracy of price/cost proposals
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
3b. Ability to process contract changes at reasonable cost.
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
3c. Ability to perform within negotiated costs/prices
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
3d. Accuracy and completeness of vouchers/invoices
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
110
|
||
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
IV. BUSINESS RELATIONS
|
||
4a. Ability to effectively manage contract
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
4b. Ability to protect, account for, and securely deliver controlled equipment,
|
||
supplies and materials.
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
4c. Ability to choose and mange subcontractors.
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
4d. Compliance with Small, Small Disadvantaged and Women-Owned Small
|
||
Business Subcontracting Plan, including achievement of goals. (For this question only;
|
||
111
|
||
|
||
Small, Small Disadvantaged and Women-Owned Small Business Concerns will automatically receive
|
||
a rating of 10.)
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
V. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
|
||
5a. Maintains readily accessible point (s) of contact to manage and resolve
|
||
problems.
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
5b. Effectively assesses impact of potential changes on other associated
|
||
projects, tasks, and efforts.
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
5c. Cooperatively interfaces with customer.
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
112
|
||
|
||
5d. Displays initiative in meeting customer’s requirements and is responsive
|
||
to the customer’s needs.
|
||
Please circle the appropriate rating below or check if N/A
|
||
(a) Exceptional (b) Very Good (c) Satisfactory (d) Marginal (e) Unsatisfactory (f) Not
|
||
Applicable
|
||
Response: [ ]
|
||
Remarks:
|
||
BASED ON THIS CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL PERFORMANCE, WOULD
|
||
YOU AWARD THIS COMPANY ANOTHER CONTRACT?
|
||
YES NO
|
||
If no, please explain:
|
||
__________________________________________________________________
|
||
__________________________________________________________________
|
||
__________________________________________________________________
|
||
__________________
|
||
PLEASE USE THE SPACE BELOW TO PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL
|
||
COMMENTS CONCERNING THE PAST PERFORMACNE OF THE
|
||
CONTRACTOR:
|
||
__________________________________________________________________
|
||
__________________________________________________________________
|
||
__________________________________________________________________
|
||
__________________________________________________________________
|
||
__________________________________________________________________
|
||
__________________________________________________________________
|
||
__________________________________________________________________
|
||
__________________________________________
|
||
Survey Completion Date: _____________________________
|
||
113
|
||
|
||
Thank you for completing this past performance evaluation. Please mail or fax
|
||
the completed survey to the address indicated below.
|
||
GPO
|
||
[ADDRESS
|
||
114
|
||
|
||
SECTION - K - REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS
|
||
OF BIDDERS
|
||
1. SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN REPRESENTATION
|
||
2. TAXPAYER INFORMATION
|
||
3. WALSH-HEALY PUBLIC CONTRACTS ACT REPRESENTATION
|
||
4. PREVIOUS CONTRACTS AND COMPLIANCE REPORTS
|
||
5. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION COMPLIANCE
|
||
6. PROHIIBITION OF SEGRATED FACILITIES
|
||
7. NOTICE OF TOTAL HUBZONE SET-ASIDE
|
||
8. EQUAL LOW BIDS
|
||
9. PLACE OF PERORMANCE
|
||
10. CERTIFICATE REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, PROPOSED DEBARMENT
|
||
AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS
|
||
11. CERTIFICATE OF INDEPENDENT PRICE DETERMINATION
|
||
12. CONTINGENT FEE REPRESENTATION AND AGREEMENT
|
||
13. CLEAN AIR & WATER CERTIFICATION
|
||
14. CERTIFICATION AND DISCLOSURE REGARDING PAYMENTS TO INFLUENCE CERTAIN
|
||
FEDERAL TRANSACTIONS
|
||
15. ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST CERTIFICATE
|
||
16. NOTICE OF PARTICIPATION BY ORGANIZATIONS FOR THE HANDICAPPED
|
||
115
|
||
|
||
Representations and Certifications Reference
|
||
Name and Address of Offeror Date of Offer
|
||
"SOLICITATION" MEANS "INVITATION FOR BIDS" IN SEALED BIDDING AND "REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL" OR
|
||
"REQUEST FOR QUOTATION" IN NEGOTIATION.
|
||
"OFFER" MEANS "BID" IN SEALED BIDDING AND "PROPOSAL" IN NEGOTIATION.
|
||
"OFFEROR" MEANS THE PERSON OR FIRM SUBMITTING THE OFFER.
|
||
THE OFFEROR MAKES THE FOLLOWING REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS AS A PART OF THE
|
||
OFFER IDENTIFIED ABOVE. (CHECK APPROPRIATE CIRCLE AND FILL IN BLANKS.)
|
||
1. 552.219-1 SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN REPRESENTATION (MAY 1991) (DEVIATION MMAR 52.219-1)
|
||
(cid:129) (cid:129)
|
||
(a) Representation. The offeror represents and certifies as part of its offer that it is or is not a small business
|
||
concern.
|
||
(b) Definition. Small business concern, as used in this provision, means a concern, including its affiliates that is
|
||
independently owned and operated, not dominant in the field of operation in which it is bidding on Government contracts,
|
||
and qualified as a small business under the criteria and size standards in this solicitation.
|
||
© Notice. Under 15 U.S.C. 645(d), any person who misrepresents a firm's status as a small business concern in order
|
||
to obtain a contract to be awarded under the preference programs established pursuant to section 8(a), 8(d), 9, or 15 of
|
||
the Small Business Act or, any other provision of Federal law that specifically references section 8(d) for a definition of
|
||
program eligibility, shall (1) be punished by imposition of a fine, imprisonment, or both; (2) be subject to administrative
|
||
remedies including suspension and debarment; and (3) be ineligible for participation in programs conducted under the
|
||
authority of the Act.
|
||
2. 52.204-3 TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION (Oct 1998)
|
||
(a) Definitions.
|
||
"Common parent," as used in this provision, means that corporate entity that owns or controls an affiliated group of
|
||
corporations that files its Federal income tax returns on a consolidated basis, and of which the offeror is a member.
|
||
"Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN)," as used in this provision, means the number required by the Internal Revenue
|
||
Service (IRS) to be used by the offeror in reporting income tax and other returns. The TIN may be either a Social Security
|
||
Number or an Employer Identification Number.
|
||
(b) All offerors must submit the information required in paragraphs (d) through (f) of this provision to comply with debt
|
||
collection requirements of 31 U.S.C. 7701(c) and 3325(d), reporting requirements of 26 U.S.C. 6041, 6041A, and 6050M,
|
||
and implementing regulations issued by the IRS. If the resulting contract is subject to the payment reporting requirements
|
||
described in Federal Acquisition Regulation (MMAR) 4.904, the failure or refusal by the offeror to furnish the information
|
||
may result in a 31 percent reduction of payments otherwise due under the contract.
|
||
(c) The TIN may be used by the Government to collect and report on any delinquent amounts arising out of the offeror's
|
||
relationship with the Government (31 U.S.C. 7701(c)(3)). If the resulting contract is subject to the payment reporting
|
||
requirements described in MMAR 4.904, the TIN provided hereunder may be matched with IRS records to verify the
|
||
accuracy of the offeror's TIN.
|
||
(d) Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN).
|
||
* TIN: _____________________.
|
||
116
|
||
|
||
* TIN has been applied for.
|
||
* TIN is not required because:
|
||
* Offeror is a nonresident alien, foreign corporation, or foreign partnership that does not have income effectively
|
||
connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States and does not have an office or place of business or
|
||
a fiscal paying agent in the United States;
|
||
* Offeror is an agency or instrumentality of a foreign government;
|
||
* Offeror is an agency or instrumentality of the Federal Government.
|
||
(e) Type of organization.
|
||
* Sole proprietorship;
|
||
* Partnership;
|
||
* Corporate entity (not tax-exempt);
|
||
* Corporate entity (tax-exempt);
|
||
* Government entity (Federal, State, or local);
|
||
• Foreign government;
|
||
• International organization per 26 CFR 1.6049-4;
|
||
* Other _________________________.
|
||
(f) Common parent.
|
||
* Offeror is not owned or controlled by a common parent as defined in paragraph (a) of this provision.
|
||
* Name and TIN of common parent:
|
||
Name _____________________________
|
||
TIN ______________________________
|
||
ITEMS 3, 4, 5, AND 6 NEED TO BE CHECKED ONLY IF OFFER EXCEEDS $10,000 IN
|
||
AMOUNT.
|
||
.
|
||
3 52.222-20 WALSH-HEALY PUBLIC CONTRACTS ACT (DEC 1996)
|
||
If this contract is for the manufacture or furnishing of materials, supplies, articles or equipment in an amount that exceeds
|
||
or may exceed $10,000, and is subject to the Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act, as amended (41 U.S.C. 35-45), the
|
||
following terms and conditions apply:
|
||
(a) All stipulations required by the Act and regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor (41 CFR Chapter 50) are
|
||
incorporated by reference. These stipulations are subject to all applicable rulings and interpretations of the Secretary of
|
||
Labor that are now, or may hereafter, be in effect.
|
||
(b) All employees whose work relates to this contract shall be paid not less than the minimum wage prescribed by
|
||
regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor (41 CFR 50-202.2). Learners, student learners, apprentices, and
|
||
117
|
||
|
||
handicapped workers may be employed at less than the prescribed minimum wage (see 41 CFR 50-202.3) to the same
|
||
extent that such employment is permitted under Section 14 of the Fair Labor Standards Act (41 U.S.C. 40).
|
||
4. 52.222-22 PREVIOUS CONTRACTS AND COMPLIANCE REPORTS (FEB 1999))
|
||
The offeror represents that--
|
||
(a) It * has, * has not participated in a previous contract or subcontract subject the Equal Opportunity clause of this
|
||
solicitation;
|
||
(b) It * has, * has not filed all required compliance reports; and
|
||
(c) Representations indicating submission of required compliance reports, signed by proposed subcontractors, will be
|
||
obtained before subcontract awards.
|
||
5. 52.222-25 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION COMPLIANCE (APR 1984)
|
||
(Applicable to contracts which include the clause at MMAR 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity, except for construction
|
||
contracts.)
|
||
The offeror represents that --
|
||
(cid:129) (cid:129)
|
||
(a) It has developed and has on file, has not developed and does not have on file, at each establishment,
|
||
affirmative action programs required by the rules and regulations of the Secretary of Labor (41 CFR 60-1 and 60-2); or
|
||
(cid:129)
|
||
(b) It has not previously had contracts subject to the written affirmative action programs requirement of the rules
|
||
and regulations of the Secretary of Labor.
|
||
6. 52.222-21 PROHIBITION OF SEGREGATED FACILITIES (FEB 1999)
|
||
(a) "Segregated facilities," as used in this clause, means any waiting rooms, work areas, rest rooms and wash rooms,
|
||
restaurants and other eating areas, time clocks, locker rooms and other storage or dressing areas, parking lots, drinking
|
||
fountains, recreation or entertainment areas, transportation, and housing facilities provided for employees, that are
|
||
segregated by explicit directive or are in fact segregated on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin
|
||
because of written or oral policies or employee custom. The term does not include separate or single-user rest rooms or
|
||
necessary dressing or sleeping areas provided to assure privacy between the sexes.
|
||
(b) The Contractor agrees that it does not and will not maintain or provide for its employees any segregated facilities at
|
||
any of its establishments, and that it does not and will not permit its employees to perform their services at any location
|
||
under its control where segregated facilities are maintained. The Contractor agrees that a breach of this clause is a
|
||
violation of the Equal Opportunity clause in this contract.
|
||
(c) The Contractor shall include this clause in every subcontract and purchase order that is subject to the Equal
|
||
Opportunity clause of this contract.
|
||
ITEMS 7-19 DO NOT APPLY TO PROCUREMENTS OF $25,000 OR LESS MADE THROUGH SMALL PURCHASE
|
||
PROCEDURES.
|
||
7. 52.219-3 NOTICE OF TOTAL HUBZONE SET-ASIDE (JAN 1999)
|
||
(a) Definition. "HUBZone small business concern," as used in this clause, means a small business concern that appears
|
||
on the List of Qualified HUBZone Small Business Concerns maintained by the Small Business Administration.
|
||
(b) General. (1) Offers are solicited only from HUBZone small business concerns. Offers received from concerns that are
|
||
not HUBZone small business concerns shall not be considered.
|
||
(2) Any award resulting from this solicitation will be made to a HUBZone small business concern.
|
||
118
|
||
|
||
(c) Agreement. A HUBZone small business concern agrees that in the performance of the contract, in the case of a
|
||
contract for--
|
||
(1) Services (except construction), at least 50 percent of the cost of personnel for contract performance will be spent for
|
||
employees of the concern or employees of other HUBZone small business concerns;
|
||
(2) Supplies (other than acquisition from a nonmanufacturer of the supplies), at least 50 percent of the cost of
|
||
manufacturing, excluding the cost of materials, will be performed by the concern or other HUBZone small business
|
||
concerns;
|
||
(3) General construction, at least 15 percent of the cost of the contract performance incurred for personnel will be spent
|
||
on the concern's employees or the employees of other HUBZone small business concerns; or
|
||
(4) Construction by special trade contractors, at least 25 percent of the cost of the contract performance incurred for
|
||
personnel will be spent on the concern's employees or the employees of other HUBZone small business concerns.
|
||
(d) A HUBZone joint venture agrees that, in the performance of the contract, the applicable percentage specified in
|
||
paragraph (c) of this clause will be performed by the HUBZone small business participant or participants.
|
||
(e) A HUBZone small business concern nonmanufacturer agrees to furnish in performing this contract only end items
|
||
manufactured or produced by HUBZone small business manufacturer concerns. This paragraph does not apply in
|
||
connection with construction or service contracts.
|
||
8. 52.219-2 EQUAL LOW BIDS (OCT 1995)
|
||
(a) This provision applies to small business concerns only.
|
||
(b) The bidder's status as a labor surplus area (LSA) concern may affect entitlement to award in case of tie bids. If the
|
||
bidder wishes to be considered for this priority, the bidder must identify, in the following space, the LSA in which the costs
|
||
to be incurred on account of manufacturing or production (by the bidder or the first-tier subcontractors) amount to more
|
||
than 50 percent of the contract price.
|
||
__________________________________________
|
||
__________________________________________
|
||
(c) Failure to identify the labor surplus areas as specified in paragraph (b) of this provision will preclude the bidder from
|
||
receiving priority consideration. If the bidder is awarded a contract as a result of receiving priority consideration under this
|
||
provision and would not have otherwise received award, the bidder shall perform the contract or cause the contract to be
|
||
performed in accordance with the obligations of an LSA concern.
|
||
9. 52.215-6 PLACE OF PERFORMANCE (OCT 1997)
|
||
(a) The offeror or respondent, in the performance of any contract resulting from this solicitation, * intends, * does not
|
||
intend [check applicable block] to use one or more plants or facilities located at a different address from the address of the
|
||
offeror or respondent as indicated in this proposal or response to request for information.
|
||
(b) If the offeror or respondent checks "intends" in paragraph (a) of this provision, it shall insert in the following spaces the
|
||
required information:
|
||
Place of Performance Name and Address of Owner (Street Address, City, and Operator of the Plant , State, County, Zip
|
||
Code) or Facility if Other than Offeror or Respondent.
|
||
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
||
______________
|
||
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
||
______________
|
||
119
|
||
|
||
10. 52.209-5 CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, PROPOSED DEBARMENT, AND OTHER
|
||
RESPONSIBILITY
|
||
MATTERS (APR 2001)
|
||
(a)(1) The Offeror certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that--
|
||
(i) The Offeror and/or any of its Principals--
|
||
(A) Are * are not * presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible for the award of
|
||
contracts by any Federal agency;
|
||
(b) Have * have not *, within the three-year period preceding this offer, been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered
|
||
against them for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or
|
||
performing a public (Federal, state, or local) contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or state antitrust statutes relating
|
||
to the submission of offers; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records,
|
||
making false statements, tax evasion, or receiving stolen property; [This language stayed indefinitely. Please use
|
||
paragraph (a)(1)(i)(D) below.]
|
||
(c) Are * are not * presently indicted for, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity with,
|
||
commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)(1)(i)(B) of this provision; and [This language stayed
|
||
indefinitely. Please use paragraph (a)(1)(i)(E) below.]
|
||
(D) Have [ ] have not [ ], within a three-year period preceding this offer, been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered
|
||
against them for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or
|
||
performing a public (Federal, state, or local) contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or state antitrust statutes relating
|
||
to the submission of offers; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records,
|
||
making false statements, tax evasion, or receiving stolen property; and
|
||
(E) Are [ ] are not [ ] presently indicted for, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity with,
|
||
commission of any of the offenses enumerated in subdivision (a)(1)(i)(D) of this provision.
|
||
(ii)(A) [This paragraph (a)(1)(ii) is stayed indefinitely.] The offeror, aside from the offenses enumerated in paragraphs
|
||
(a)(1)(i)(A), (B), and (C) of this provision, has * has not * within the past three years, relative to tax, labor and employment,
|
||
environmental, antitrust, or consumer protection laws--
|
||
(1) Been convicted of a Federal or State felony (or has any Federal or State felony indictments currently pending against
|
||
them); or
|
||
(2) Had a Federal court judgment in a civil case brought by the United States rendered against them; or
|
||
(3) Had an adverse decision by a Federal administrative law judge, board, or commission indicating a willful violation of
|
||
law.
|
||
(B) If the offeror has responded affirmatively, the offeror shall provide additional information if requested by the
|
||
Contracting Officer; and
|
||
(iii) The Offeror has * has not *, within a three-year period preceding this offer, had one or more contracts terminated for
|
||
default by any Federal agency.
|
||
(2) "Principals," for the purposes of this certification, means officers; directors; owners; partners; and, persons having
|
||
primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager; head
|
||
of a subsidiary, division, or business segment, and similar positions).
|
||
This Certification Concerns a Matter Within the Jurisdiction of an Agency of the United States and the Making of a False,
|
||
Fictitious, or Fraudulent Certification May Render the Maker Subject to Prosecution Under Section 1001, Title 18, United
|
||
States Code.
|
||
(b) The Offeror shall provide immediate written notice to the Contracting Officer if, at any time prior to contract award, the
|
||
Offeror learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed
|
||
circumstances.
|
||
120
|
||
|
||
(c) A certification that any of the items in paragraph (a) of this provision exists will not necessarily result in withholding of
|
||
an award under this solicitation. However, the certification will be considered in connection with a determination of the
|
||
Offeror's responsibility. Failure of the Offeror to furnish a certification or provide such additional information as requested
|
||
by the Contracting Officer may render the Offeror nonresponsible.
|
||
(d) Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to
|
||
render, in good faith, the certification required by paragraph (a) of this provision. The knowledge and information of an
|
||
Offeror is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business
|
||
dealings.
|
||
(e) The certification in paragraph (a) of this provision is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed
|
||
when making award. If it is later determined that the Offeror knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to
|
||
other remedies available to the Government, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract resulting from this
|
||
solicitation for default.
|
||
11. 52.203-2 CERTIFICATE OF INDEPENDENT PRICE DETERMINATION (APR 1985)
|
||
(a) The offeror certifies that--
|
||
(1) The prices in this offer have been arrived at independently, without, for the purpose of restricting competition, any
|
||
consultation, communication, or agreement with any other offeror or competitor relating to (I) those prices, (ii) the intention
|
||
to submit an offer, or (iii) the methods or factors used to calculate the prices offered;
|
||
(2) The prices in this offer have not been and will not be knowingly disclosed by the offeror, directly or indirectly, to
|
||
any other offeror or competitor before bid opening (in the case of a sealed bid solicitation) or contract award (in the case
|
||
of a negotiated solicitation) unless otherwise required by law; and
|
||
(3) No attempt has been made or will be made by the offeror to induce any other concern to submit or not to submit an
|
||
offer for the purpose of restricting competition.
|
||
(b) Each signature on the offer is considered to be a certification by the signatory that the signatory--
|
||
(1) Is the person in the offeror's organization responsible for determining the prices being offered in this bid or
|
||
proposal, and that the signatory has not participated and will not participate in any action contrary to subparagraphs (a)(1)
|
||
through (a)(3) above; or
|
||
(2) (I) Has been authorized, in writing, to act as agent for the following principals in certifying that those principals
|
||
have not participated, and will not participate in any action contrary to subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) above
|
||
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
||
____________________________________
|
||
_________________________________________________________________________________ [insert full name of
|
||
person(s) in the offeror's
|
||
organization responsible for determining the prices offered in this bid or proposal, and the title of his or her position in the
|
||
offeror's organization];
|
||
(ii) As an authorized agent, does certify that the principals named in subdivision (b)(2)(I) above have not
|
||
participated, and will not participate, in any action contrary to subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) above; and
|
||
(iii) As an agent, has not personally participated, and will not participate, in any action contrary to
|
||
subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) above.
|
||
© If the offeror deletes or modifies subparagraph (a)(2) above, the offeror must furnish with its offer a signed statement
|
||
setting forth in detail the circumstances of the disclosure.
|
||
12. 52.203-4 CONTINGENT FEE REPRESENTATION AND AGREEMENT (APR 1984)
|
||
(a) Representation. The offeror represents that, except for full-time bona fide employees working solely for the offeror,
|
||
the offeror--
|
||
[NOTE: For interpretation of the representation, including the term “bona fide employees,” sees Subpart 3.4 of the
|
||
Federal Acquisition Regulation.]
|
||
(cid:129) (cid:129)
|
||
(1) has, has not employed or retained any person or company to solicit or obtain this contract; and
|
||
121
|
||
|
||
(cid:129) (cid:129)
|
||
(2) has, has not paid or agreed to pay to any person or company employed or retained to solicit or
|
||
obtain this contract any commission, percentage, brokerage, or other fee contingent upon or resulting from the award of
|
||
this contract.
|
||
(b) Agreement. The offeror agrees to provide information relating to the above Representation as requested by the
|
||
Contracting Officer and, when subparagraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) is answered affirmatively, to promptly submit to the
|
||
Contracting Officer --
|
||
(1) A completed Standard Form 119, Statement of Contingent or Other Fees, (SF 119); or
|
||
(2) A signed statement indicating that the SF 119 was previously submitted to the same contracting office, including
|
||
the date and applicable solicitation or contract number, and representing that the prior SF 119 applies to this offer or
|
||
quotation.
|
||
13 52.223-1 CLEAN AIR AND WATER CERTIFICATION (APR 1984)
|
||
(Applicable if the offer exceeds $100,000 or the Contracting Officer has determined that orders under an indefinite
|
||
quantity contract in any year will exceed $100,000, or a facility to be used has been the subject of a conviction under the
|
||
Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7413(c)(1)) or the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1319(c)) and is listed by EPA,
|
||
or is not otherwise exempt.)
|
||
The offeror certifies that --
|
||
(cid:129) (cid:129)
|
||
(a) Any facility to be used in the performance of this proposed contract is , is not listed on the Environmental
|
||
Protection Agency List of Violation Facilities;
|
||
(b) The offeror will immediately notify the Contracting Officer, before award, of the receipt of any communication from
|
||
the Administrator, or a designee, of the Environmental Protection Agency, indicating that any facility that the offeror
|
||
proposes to use for the performance of the contract is under consideration to be listed on the EPA List of Violating
|
||
Facilities; and
|
||
© The offeror will include a certification substantially the same as this certification, including this paragraph (c), in every
|
||
nonexempt subcontract.
|
||
14. 52.203-11 CERTIFICATION AND DISCLOSURE REGARDING PAYMENTS TO INFLUENCE CERTAIN FEDERAL
|
||
TRANSACTIONS (APR 1991) (Deviation)
|
||
(Applicable if the offer exceeds $100,000)
|
||
(a) The definitions and prohibitions contained in the clause, at MMAR 52.203-12, Limitation on Payments to Influence
|
||
Certain Federal Transactions, included in this solicitation are hereby incorporated by reference in paragraph (b) of this
|
||
certification.
|
||
(b) The offeror, by signing its offer, hereby certifies to the best of his or her knowledge and belief that on or after
|
||
December 23, 1989--
|
||
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to
|
||
influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an
|
||
employee of a Member of Congress on his or her behalf in connection with the awarding of a contract resulting from this
|
||
solicitation.
|
||
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds (including profit or fee received under a covered Federal
|
||
transaction) have been paid, or will be paid, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee
|
||
of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress on
|
||
his or her behalf in connection with this solicitation, the offeror shall complete and submit, with its offer, OMB standard
|
||
form LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying Activities, to the Contracting Officer; and certificate to the Contracting Officer prior to the
|
||
award of a contract to the SBA.
|
||
(3) He or she will include the language of this certification in all subcontract awards at any tier and require that all
|
||
recipients of subcontract awards in excess of $100,000 shall certify and disclose accordingly.
|
||
© Submission of this certification and disclosure is a prerequisite for making or entering into this contract imposed by
|
||
section 1352, title 31, United States Code. Any person who makes an expenditure prohibited under this provision or who
|
||
fails to file or amend the disclosure form to be filed or amended by this provision, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not
|
||
less than $10,000, and not more than $100,000, for each such failure.
|
||
15. 52-209-7 ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST CERTIFICATE--MARKETING CONSULTANTS (NOV
|
||
1991)
|
||
(Applicable to negotiated acquisitions if the offer exceeds $200,000.)
|
||
122
|
||
|
||
(a) Definitions.
|
||
(1) Marketing consultant means any independent contractor who furnishes advice, information, directions, or
|
||
assistance to an offeror or any other contractor in support of the preparation or submission of an offer for a government
|
||
contract by that offeror. An independent Contractor is not a marketing consultant when rendering--
|
||
(I) Services excluded in Subpart 37.204;
|
||
(ii) Routine engineering and technical services (such as installation, operation, or maintenance of systems,
|
||
equipment, software, components, or facilities);
|
||
(iii) Routine legal, actuarial, auditing, and accounting services; or,
|
||
(iv) Training services.
|
||
(2) Organizational conflict of interest means that because of other activities or relationships with other persons, a
|
||
person is unable or potentially unable to render impartial assistance or advice to the Government, or the person's
|
||
objectively in performing the contract work is or might be otherwise impaired, or a person has an unfair competitive
|
||
advantage.
|
||
(b) An individual or firm that employs, retains or engages contractually one or more marketing consultants in
|
||
connection with a contract, shall submit to the Contracting Officer, with respect to each marketing consultant, the
|
||
certificates described below, if the individual or firm is notified that it is the apparent successful offeror.
|
||
(c) The certificate must contain the following:
|
||
(1) The name of the agency and the number of the solicitation in question.
|
||
(2) The name, address, telephone number, and federal taxpayer identification number of the marketing consultant.
|
||
(3) The names, addresses, and telephone number of a responsible officer or employee of the marketing consultant
|
||
who has personal knowledge of the marketing consultants involvement in the contract.
|
||
(4) A description of the nature of the services rendered by or to be rendered by the marketing consultant.
|
||
(5) The name, address, and telephone number of the client or clients, and the name of a responsible officer or
|
||
employee of the marketing consultant who is knowledgeable about the services provided to such client(s), and a
|
||
description of the nature of the services rendered to such client(s), if, based on information provided to the Contractor by
|
||
the marketing consultant, any marketing consultant is rendering or, in the 12 months preceding the date of the certificate,
|
||
has rendered services respecting the same subject matter of the instant solicitation, or directly relating to such subject
|
||
matter, to the Government or any other client (including any foreign government or person).
|
||
(6) A statement that the person who signs the certificate for the prime Contractor has informed the marketing
|
||
consultant of the existence of Subpart 9.5 and Office of Federal Procurement Policy Letter 89-1.
|
||
(7) The signature, name, title, employer's name, address, and telephone number of the persons who signed the
|
||
certificates for both the apparent successful offeror and the marketing consultant.
|
||
(d) In addition, the apparent successful offeror shall forward to the a certificate signed by the marketing consultant that
|
||
the marketing consultant has been told of the existence of Subpart 9.5 and Office of the Federal Procurement Policy
|
||
Letter 89-1, and the marketing consultant has made inquiry, and to the best of the consultant's knowledge and belief, the
|
||
consultant has provided no unfair competitive advantage to the prime Contractor with respect to the services rendered or
|
||
to be rendered in connection with the solicitation, or that any unfair competitive advantage that, to the best of the
|
||
consultant's knowledge and belief, does or may exist, has been disclosed to the offeror.
|
||
(e) Failure of the offeror to provide the required certifications may result in the offeror being determined ineligible for
|
||
award. Misrepresentation of any fact may result in the assessment of penalties associated with false certifications or such
|
||
other provisions provided for by law or regulation.
|
||
16. 52.219-15 NOTICE OF PARTICIPATION BY ORGANIZATIONS FOR THE HANDICAPPED (APR 1991)
|
||
(Applies if solicitation is total or partial small business set-aside)
|
||
(a) Definitions.
|
||
"Handicapped individual" means a person who has a physical, mental, or emotional impairment, defect, ailment,
|
||
disease, or disability of a permanent nature which in any way limits the selection of any type of employment for which the
|
||
person would otherwise be qualified or qualifiable.
|
||
123
|
||
|
||
"Public or private organization for the handicapped" means one (1) which is organized under the laws of the United
|
||
States or of any State, operated in the interest of handicapped individuals, the net income of which does not inure in
|
||
whole or in part to the benefit of any shareholder or other individual; (2) which complies with any applicable occupational
|
||
health and safety standard prescribed by the Secretary of Labor; and (3) employs in the production of commodities and in
|
||
the provision of services, handicapped individuals for not less than 75 percent of the direct labor required for the
|
||
production of provision of the commodities or services.
|
||
(cid:129) (cid:129)
|
||
(b) Certification. The offeror certifies that it is is not a public or private organization for the handicapped. An
|
||
offeror certifying in the affirmative is eligible to participate in any resultant contract as if it were a small business concern.
|
||
© Agreement. An offeror certifying as a public or private organization for the handicapped agrees that at least 75
|
||
percent of the direct labor required in the performance of the contract will be performed by handicapped individuals.
|
||
124
|
||
|
||
SECTION - L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES - NEGOTIATED
|
||
1. SOLICITATION DEFINITIONS
|
||
2. PREPARATIONS HAVE OFFERORS – OTHER THAN CONSTRUCTION
|
||
3. EXPLANATION TO PROSPECTIVE OFFERORS
|
||
4. AMENDMENTS TO INVITATIONS FOR OFFERS
|
||
5. SUBMISSION HAVE OFFERS
|
||
6. FAILURE TO SUBMIT OFFER
|
||
7. LATE SUBMISSIONS, MODIFICATIONS, AND WITHDRAWALS OF PROPOSALS
|
||
8. UNNECESSARILY ELABORATE PROPOSALS OR QUOTATIONS
|
||
9. RESTRICTION ON DISCLOSURE AND USE OF DATA
|
||
10. SITE VISIT
|
||
11. FINANCIAL STATEMENT
|
||
12. CONTRACT AWARD OTHER THAN CONSTRUCTION
|
||
13. CONTRACT AWARD CONSTRUCTION
|
||
14. AUTHORIZED DEVIATIONS IN PROVISIONS
|
||
125
|
||
|
||
SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
|
||
(Negotiated)
|
||
1. MMAR 52.215-5- SOLICITATION DEFINITIONS (JUL 1987) (4) Is the only proposal received.
|
||
(b) Any modification of a proposal or quotation, except a
|
||
"Government" means United States Government.
|
||
modification resulting from the Contracting Officer's request for "best and
|
||
"Offer" means "proposal" in negotiation.
|
||
"Solicitation" means a request for proposals (RFP) or a request for final" offer, is subject to the same conditions as in subparagraphs (a)(1),(2),
|
||
quotations (RFQ) in negotiation. and (3) of this provision.
|
||
(c) A modification resulting from the contracting Officer's
|
||
request for "best and final" offer received after the time and date specified in
|
||
2. MMAR 52.215-14 - EXPLANATION TO PROSPECTIVE the request will not be considered unless received before award and the late
|
||
OFFERORS (APR 1984)
|
||
receipt is due solely to mishandling by the Government after receipt at the
|
||
Any prospective offeror designing an explanation or interpretation of Government installation.
|
||
the solicitation, drawings, specifications, etc., must request it in (d) The only acceptable evidence to establish the date of
|
||
writing soon enough to allow a reply to reach all prospective offerors mailing of a late proposal or modification sent either by U.S. Postal Service
|
||
before the submission of their offers. Oral explanations or registered or certified mail is the U.S. Canadian Postal Service postmark both
|
||
instructions given before the award of the contract will not be
|
||
on the envelope or wrapper and on the original receipt from the U.S. or
|
||
binding. Any information given to a prospective offeror concerning a
|
||
Canadian Postal Service. Both postmarks must show a legible date or the
|
||
solicitation will be furnished promptly to all other prospective offerors
|
||
as an amendment of the solicitation, if that information is necessary proposal, quotation, or modification shall be processed as if mailed late.
|
||
in submitting offers or if the lack of it would be prejudicial to any "Postmark" means a printed, stamped, or otherwise placed impression
|
||
other prospective offerors. (exclusive of a postage meter machine impression) that is readily identifiable
|
||
without further action as having been supplied and affixed by employees of
|
||
4. MMAR 52.215-8 - AMENDMENTS TO SOLICITATIONS (DEC
|
||
the U.S. or Canadian Postal Service on the date of mailing. Therefore, offerors
|
||
1989)
|
||
or quoters should request the postal clerks to place a hand cancellation bull's
|
||
(a) If this solicitation is amended, then all terms and eye postmark on both the receipt and the envelope or wrapper.
|
||
conditions which are not modified remain unchanged. (e) The only acceptable evidence to establish the time of
|
||
(b) Offerors shall acknowledge receipt of any amendment receipt at the Government installation is the time/date stamp of that
|
||
to this solicitation by (1) signing and returning the amendment, (2) identifying installation on the proposal wrapper or other documentary evidence of receipt
|
||
the amendment number and date in the space provided for this purpose on the maintained by the installation.
|
||
form for submitting an offer, (3) letter of telegram, or (4) facsimile, if (f) The only acceptable evidence to establish the date of
|
||
facsimile offers are authorized in the solicitation. The Government must mailing of a late offer, modification, or withdrawal sent by Express Mail Next
|
||
receive the acknowledgment by the time specified for receipt of offers. Day Service-Post Office to Addressee is the date entered by the post office
|
||
receiving clerk on the "Express Mail Next Day Service-Post Office to
|
||
5. MMAR 52.215-9 - SUBMISSION OF OFFERS DEC 1989) Addressee" label and the postmark on both the envelope or wrapper and on
|
||
the original receipt from the U.S. Postal Service, "Postmark" has the same
|
||
(a) Offers and modifications thereof shall be submitted in meaning as defined in paragraph (d) of this provision, excluding postmarks of
|
||
sealed envelopes or packages (1) addressed to the office specified in the the Canadian Postal Service. Therefore, offerors or quotes should request the
|
||
solicitation, and (2) showing the time specified for receipt, the solicitation postal clerk to place a legible hand cancellation bull's eye postmark on both
|
||
number, and the name and address of the offeror. the receipt and the envelope or wrapper.
|
||
(b) Telegraphic offers will not be considered unless (g) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this provision, a late
|
||
authorized by the solicitation; however, offers may be modified by written or modification of an otherwise successful proposal that makes its terms more
|
||
telegraphic notice. favorable to the Government will be considered at any time it is received and
|
||
(c) Facsimile offers, modifications or withdrawals will not may be accepted.
|
||
be considered unless authorized by the solicitation. (h) Proposals may be withdrawn by written notice or
|
||
(d) Item samples, if required, must be submitted within the telegram (including Mailgram) received at any time before award. If the
|
||
time specified for receipt of offers. Unless otherwise specified in the solicitation authorizes facsimile proposals, proposals may be withdrawn via
|
||
solicitation, these samples shall be (1) submitted at no expense to the facsimile received at any time before award, subject to the conditions
|
||
Government and (2) returned at the sender's request and expense, unless they specified in the provision entitled "Facsimile Proposals." Proposals may be
|
||
are destroyed during preaward testing. withdrawn in person by an offeror or an authorized representative, if the
|
||
representative's identity is made known and the representative signs a receipt
|
||
6. MMAR 52.215-15 - FAILURE TO SUBMIT OFFER (APR 1984)
|
||
for the proposals before award.
|
||
(This provision does not apply to construction.) Recipients of this
|
||
8. MMAR 52.215-7 - UNNECESSARILY ELABORATE PROPOSALS
|
||
solicitation no responding with an offerors should not return this
|
||
OR QUOTATIONS (APR 1984)
|
||
solicitation, unless it specifies otherwise. Instead, they should
|
||
Unnecessarily elaborate brochures or other presentations beyond
|
||
advise the issuing office by letter or postcard whether they want to
|
||
the sufficient to present a complete and effective response to this
|
||
receive future solicitations for similar requirements. If a recipient
|
||
solicitation are not desired and may be construed as an indication of
|
||
does not submit an offer and does not notify the issuing office that
|
||
the offeror's or quoter's lace of cost consciousness. Elaborate art
|
||
future solicitations are desired, the recipient's name may be
|
||
work, expensive paper and bindings, and expensive visual and
|
||
removed from the applicable mailing list.
|
||
other presentation aids are neither necessary not wanted.
|
||
7. MMAR 52.215- 10 - LATE SUBMISSIONS, MODIFICATIONS,
|
||
9. MMAR 52.215-12 - RESTRICTION ON DISCLOSURE AND USE
|
||
AND WITHDRAWALS OR PROPOSALS (DEC 1989)
|
||
OF DATA (APR 1984)
|
||
(a) Any proposal received at the office designated in the
|
||
Offerors or quoters who include in their proposals or quotations data
|
||
solicitation after the exact time specified for receipt will not be considered that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose or used
|
||
unless it is received before award is made and it-- by the Government except for evaluation purposes, shall--
|
||
(1) Was sent by registered or certified mail not later than the fifth (a) Mark the title page with the following legend:
|
||
calendar day before the date specified for receipt of offers (e.g., an offer "This proposal or quotation includes data that shall not be disclosed
|
||
outside the Government and shall not be duplicated, used, or
|
||
submitted in response to a solicitation requiring receipt of offers by the 20th
|
||
disclosed -- in whole or in part-for any purpose other than to
|
||
of the month must have been mailed by the 15th);
|
||
evaluate this proposal or quotation. If, however, a contract is
|
||
(2) Was sent by mail or if authorized by the solicitation, was sent awarded to this offeror or quoter as a result of-or in connection with-
|
||
by telegram or via facsimile and it is determined by the Government that the the submission of this data, the Government shall have the right to
|
||
late receipt was due solely to mishandling by the Government after receipt at duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent provided in the
|
||
the Government installation; resulting contract. This restriction does not limit the Government's
|
||
right to use information contained in this data if it is obtained from
|
||
(3) Was sent by U.S. Postal Service Express Mail Next Day
|
||
another source without restriction. the data subject to this restriction
|
||
Service-Post Office to Addressee, not later than 5:00 p.m. at the place of are contained in sheets (insert numbers or other identification of
|
||
mailing two working days prior to the date specified for receipt of proposals. sheets);" and
|
||
The term "working days" excludes weekends and U.S. Federal holidays; or
|
||
126
|
||
|
||
(b) Mark each sheet of data it wishes to restrict with the (b) The Government may (1) reject any or all offers if such
|
||
following legend: action is in the public interest, (2) accept other than the lowest offer, and (3)
|
||
"Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers received.
|
||
restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation." (c) The Government may award a contract on the basis of
|
||
initial offers received, without discussions. Therefore, each initial offer
|
||
10. MMAR 52.237-1 - SITE VISIT (APR 1984)
|
||
should contain the offeror's best terms from a cost or price and technical
|
||
(Applies when services other than construction are to be performed standpoint.
|
||
on Government installations.) (d) The Government may accept any item or combination
|
||
Offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site of items, unless doing so is precluded by a restrictive limitation in the
|
||
where services are to be performed and to satisfy themselves solicitation or the offer.
|
||
regarding all general and local conditions that may affect the cost of
|
||
(e) A written award or acceptance of offer mailed or
|
||
contract performance, to the extent that the information is
|
||
reasonably obtainable. In no event shall failure to inspect the site otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance
|
||
constitute grounds for a claim after contract award. specified in the offer shall result in a binding contract without further action
|
||
by either party. Before the offeror's specified expiration time, the
|
||
11. MMAR 52.247-6 - FINANCIAL STATEMENT (APR 1984) Government may accept an offer (or part of an Offer, as provided in paragraph
|
||
(d) above), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a
|
||
(Applies to solicitations for transportation or for transportation
|
||
written not of withdrawal is received before award. Negotiations conducted
|
||
related services.)
|
||
The offeror shall, upon request, promptly furnish the Government after receipt of an offer do not constitute a rejection or counteroffer by the
|
||
with a current certified statement of the offeror's financial condition Government.
|
||
and such data as the Government may request with respect to the (f) Neither financial data submitted with an offer, nor
|
||
offeror's operations. The Government will use this information to representations concerning facilities or financing, will form a part of the
|
||
determine the offeror's financial responsibility and ability to perform
|
||
resulting contract. However, if the resulting contract contains a clause
|
||
under the contract. Failure of an offeror to comply with a request for
|
||
information will subject the offeror to possible rejection on providing for price reduction for defective cost or pricing data, the contract
|
||
responsibility grounds. price will be subject to reduction if cost or pricing data furnished is
|
||
incomplete, inaccurate, or not current.
|
||
12. MMAR 52.215-16 - CONTRACT AWARD (JUL 1990) OTHER
|
||
THAN CONSTRUCTION 14. MMAR 552.252-5 - AUTHORIZED DEVIATIONS IN PROVISIONS
|
||
(JUL 1985) (DEVIATION MMAR 52.252-5)
|
||
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation
|
||
to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation (a) The use in this solicitation of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48
|
||
will be most advantageous to the Government, cost or price and other CFR Chapter 1) provision with an authorized deviation or variation is
|
||
factors, specified elsewhere in this solicitation,
|
||
indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" or "(VARIATION)" after
|
||
(b) considered.
|
||
the date of the provision, if the provision is not published in the General
|
||
(b) The Government may (1) reject any or all offers if such
|
||
Services Administration Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 5).
|
||
action is in the public interest, (2) accept other than the lowest offer, and (3)
|
||
The use in this solicitation of any Federal Acquisition Regulation
|
||
waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers received.
|
||
(MMAR) provision with an authorized deviation or variation that is
|
||
(c) The Government may award a contract on the basis of
|
||
published in the General Services Administration Acquisition
|
||
initial offers received, without discussions. Therefore, each initial offer
|
||
Regulation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION (MMAR
|
||
should contain the offeror's best terms from a cost or price and technical
|
||
provision no.))" or "(VARIATION (MMAR provision no.))" after the
|
||
standpoint.
|
||
date of the provision.
|
||
(d) The Government may accept any item or group of
|
||
(b) The use in this solicitation of any General Services
|
||
items of an offer, unless the offeror qualifies the offer by specific limitations.
|
||
Administration Acquisition Regulation provision with an authorized deviation
|
||
Unless otherwise provided in the Schedule, offers may be submitted for
|
||
or variation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" or
|
||
quantities less than those specified. The Government reserves the right to
|
||
"(VARIATION)" after the date of the provision.
|
||
make an award on any item for a quantity less than the quantity offered, at the
|
||
(c) Changes in wording of provisions that are prescribed
|
||
unit cost or prices offered, unless the offeror specifies otherwise in the offer.
|
||
for use on a "substantially the same as" basis are not considered deviations.
|
||
(e) A written award or acceptance of offer mailed or
|
||
Therefore, when such provisions are not worded exactly the same as the
|
||
otherwise furnish to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance
|
||
MMAR or MMAR provision, they are identified by the word
|
||
specified in the offer shall result in a binding contract without further action
|
||
"(VARIATION)."
|
||
by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government
|
||
may accept an offer for part of an offer, as provided in paragraph (d) above),
|
||
whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of
|
||
withdrawal is received before award.
|
||
Negotiations conducted after receipt of an offer do not constitute a
|
||
rejection or counter offer by the Government.
|
||
(f) Neither financial data submitted with an offer, nor
|
||
representations concerning facilities or financing, will form a part of the
|
||
resulting contract. However, if the resulting contract contains a clause
|
||
providing for price reduction for defective cost or pricing data, the contract
|
||
price will be subject to reduction if cost or pricing data furnished is
|
||
incomplete, inaccurate, or not current.
|
||
(g) The Government may determine that an offer is
|
||
unacceptable if the prices proposed are materially unbalanced between line
|
||
items or sublime items. An offer is materially unbalanced when it is based on
|
||
prices significantly less than cost for some work and prices which are
|
||
significantly overstated in relation to cost for other work, and if there is
|
||
reasonable doubt that the offer will result in the lowest overall cost to the
|
||
Government, even through it may be low evaluated offer, or it is so
|
||
unbalanced as to be tantamount to allowing and advance payment.
|
||
13. MMAR 52.215-16 - CONTRACT AWARD (ALT 1)
|
||
CONSTRUCTION (JAN 1991)
|
||
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from
|
||
this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the
|
||
solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, cost or price and
|
||
other factors, specified elsewhere in this solicitation, considered.
|
||
127
|
||
|
||
Section L – Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors
|
||
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE (US GPO)
|
||
Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors
|
||
ELECTRONIC (INTEGRATED CIRCUIT (IC) EMBEDDED) PASSPORT
|
||
COVERS
|
||
128
|
||
|
||
L.1 52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY
|
||
REFERENCE
|
||
This solicitation incorporates one or more provisions by reference, with the same force
|
||
and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will
|
||
make their full text available. The Offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may
|
||
include blocks that must be completed by the Offeror and submitted with its quotation or
|
||
offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the Offeror may identify the
|
||
provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its
|
||
quotation.
|
||
CLAUSE NO CLAUSE TITLE DATE
|
||
52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors-Competitive Acquisition (FEB 2000)
|
||
52.215-20 Requirements for Cost or Pricing Data or Information (OCT 1997)
|
||
Other Than Cost or Pricing Data - Alternate IV
|
||
52.232-38 Submission of Electronic Funds Transfer Information (MAY 1999)
|
||
with Offer
|
||
L.2 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
|
||
a. A Standard Form 33, "Solicitation, Offer, and Award," completed and signed
|
||
by the Offeror, constitutes the Offeror's acceptance of the terms and conditions of the
|
||
proposed task order. Therefore, a representative of the Offeror authorized to commit the
|
||
Offeror to contractual obligations must execute the form.
|
||
b. Offerors are expected to examine this entire solicitation document including
|
||
the Contract. Failure to do so will be at the Offeror's own risk.
|
||
c. Offerors shall furnish the information required by this solicitation. Offerors
|
||
shall sign the Standard Form 33, Block 17.
|
||
d. The Government may make award based on initial offers received, without
|
||
discussion of such offers. Accordingly, each initial offer should be submitted in as
|
||
complete form as possible and without exception to any provision.
|
||
e. The Government will not pay any Offeror for preparation of its proposal.
|
||
f. Offerors submitting restrictive data will mark it as follows in accordance with
|
||
the FAR Clause 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors —Competitive Acquisition, which is
|
||
incorporated by reference. Clause 52.215-1 states: "Offerors who include in their
|
||
proposals data they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose or used by the
|
||
Government except for evaluation purposes, shall—
|
||
(1) Mark the title page with the following legend:
|
||
129
|
||
|
||
"This proposal includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the Government
|
||
and shall not be duplicated, used or disclosed--in whole or in part--for any
|
||
purpose other than to evaluate this proposal or quotation. If, however, a
|
||
contract is awarded to this Offeror as a result of--or in connection with--the
|
||
submission of this data, the Government shall have the right to duplicate, use, or
|
||
disclose the data to the extent provided in the resulting contract. This restriction
|
||
does not limit the Government's right to use information contained in this data if
|
||
it is obtained from another source without restriction. The data subject to the
|
||
restriction is contained in sheets (insert numbers or other identification of
|
||
sheets)"; and
|
||
(2) Mark each sheet of data it wishes to restrict with the following legend:
|
||
"Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on
|
||
the title page of this proposal or quotation."
|
||
g. The Government assumes no liability for disclosure or use of unmarked data
|
||
and may use or disclose the data for any purpose. Unless restricted, information
|
||
submitted in response to this request may become subject to disclosure to the public
|
||
pursuant to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 551).
|
||
h. Proposals shall set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required
|
||
by this solicitation package (including Attachments). The penalty for making false
|
||
statements in proposals is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001.
|
||
i. Wherever in this solicitation “man”, “men”, or their related pronouns are used
|
||
and other related pronouns, (other than with reference to specific persons) as words or as
|
||
parts of words, they have been used for literary purposes and are meant in their generic
|
||
sense to include both males and females.
|
||
L.3 EXPLANATION TO PROSPECTIVE OFFERORS
|
||
Any questions must be submitted no later than 3 days after the RFP release date. The
|
||
Government will provide answers 5 days thereafter. The questions must be submitted in
|
||
writing to the GPO Albertha Broadnax, 732 North Capitol St. NW, Washington, DC
|
||
20401 or e-mail transmission at abroadnax@gpo.gov. Any information given to the
|
||
prospective Offeror concerning this RFP will be furnished promptly as a modification to
|
||
the RFP, if that information is necessary in submitting an offer, or if the lack of it would
|
||
be prejudicial to the Offeror.
|
||
Any information given to a prospective Offeror concerning this solicitation will be
|
||
furnished promptly to other prospective Offerors as a modification to the solicitation, if
|
||
that information is necessary in submitting offers, or if lack of it would be prejudicial to
|
||
other prospective Offerors.
|
||
L.4 AVAILABILITY OF EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE
|
||
130
|
||
|
||
All hardware and software proposed in response to this solicitation document shall have
|
||
been formally announced for general release on or before the closing date of the
|
||
solicitation. Failure to have equipment or software announced prior to submission of
|
||
proposal may render the Offeror’s proposal unacceptable.
|
||
L.5 SUBMISSION OF OFFERS
|
||
The Offeror shall package and clearly label the outside of the package with (i) the
|
||
Solicitation Number and (ii) the contents thereof (e.g., Part I- Price Proposal, Part II –
|
||
Written Technical Proposal). A cover letter containing any information the Offeror
|
||
wished to bring to the Government’s attention may accompany the proposal.
|
||
The proposal shall be submitted in three parts as follows: SF 33; Part I – Price
|
||
Proposal,Part II– Written Technical Proposal, and three inlay samples. These are due
|
||
__TBD__to the following:
|
||
The original proposal and electronic copies shall be submitted to the following address:
|
||
Albertha Broadnax,
|
||
Mail Stop: MMP Room A340
|
||
732 North Capitol St. NW,
|
||
Washington, DC 20401
|
||
e-mail: abroadnax@gpo.gov.
|
||
Alternative Proposals
|
||
Offerer may submit more than one proposal, each of which must satisfy the requirements
|
||
of the solicitation in order to be considered (SF 33; Part I – Price Proposal and Part II–
|
||
Written Technical Proposal). Each proposal submitted must be complete including
|
||
separate cost information. If alternative proposals are submitted, such alternatives will be
|
||
clearly labeled and identified on the cover page of each separate document. Each
|
||
proposal submitted will be evaluated on its own merits.
|
||
Alternative proposals that do not meet the requirements stated in Section C of the
|
||
solicitation are not desired and will not be considered.
|
||
Site Visit
|
||
In order that prospective Offerors can better understand the production of blank Passport
|
||
books by GPO and the personalization printing of the passport book at a Passport
|
||
Agency, there will be a visit scheduled for all Primes to see the GPO passport book
|
||
assembly process and to observe passport personalization process at the Washington
|
||
Passport Agency in Washington, DC. The visit to GPO will be at TBD and the visit to the
|
||
Washington Passport Agency will be at TBD. Primes who wish to attend these site visits
|
||
shall be limited to two attendees each and shall provide the names of the individuals to
|
||
the Contracting Officer no later than TBD. These will be the only site visits scheduled.
|
||
131
|
||
|
||
L.5.1 SUBMISSION OF COST/PRICE PROPOSAL (PART I)
|
||
Cost/Price Proposals shall be submitted in one original paper and one electronic copy.
|
||
The proposal shall contain the following tabs:
|
||
a. Solicitation, Offer and Award (SF 33) (Tab A). When completed and signed
|
||
by the Offeror constitutes the Offeror's acceptance of the terms and conditions of the
|
||
proposed task order. Therefore, the form must be executed by representatives of the
|
||
Offeror authorized to commit the Offeror to contractual obligations. Offerors shall sign
|
||
the SF 33 in Block #17.
|
||
b. Section B - Services and Prices (Tab B). The Offeror shall indicate the price
|
||
to be charged for each item in Section B rounded to the nearest whole dollar using the
|
||
template provided.
|
||
c. Cost/Price Supporting Documentation (Tab C). The information requested in
|
||
the proposal is required to enable the Government to perform cost or price analysis and
|
||
ultimately to enable the Government and the Offeror to negotiate fair and reasonable
|
||
prices. The Offeror shall prepare one summary schedule (RFP Section B) which provides
|
||
the Total Amount of Cost, Total amount of cost reimbursable CLINS, the total amount of
|
||
time and material CLIN, and the Overall Total Price offered. Along with the summary
|
||
schedule, the Offeror is required to provide full back-up documentation for each CLIN.
|
||
The back-up documentation shall detail the labor categories to be used, labor hours
|
||
proposed by category, material and equipment costs, and a total cost breakdown. The
|
||
Offeror shall also provide supporting cost/price documentation for all proposed
|
||
subcontractors, to include the proposed type of subcontract. The Project Manager cost
|
||
shall be shared across fixed priced CLINs but not as a separate item.
|
||
Subcontractors may submit proprietary data directly to the Contracting Offeror or
|
||
through the prime Offeror in a separate, sealed envelope. In addition to the cost back-up
|
||
cited previously, DCAA contact information and/or relevant cost/pricing data should be
|
||
provided for all subcontractors to facilitate the timely Government evaluation of
|
||
proposals.
|
||
L.5.2 SUBMISSION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (PART II)
|
||
Failure to follow the instructions in this section may result in the proposal being
|
||
considered non-compliant.
|
||
L.5.2.1 Format Requirements
|
||
Sections A, B and C of written proposals shall not exceed 30 pages and, for ease of
|
||
evaluation purposes, each line of the proposal will be numbered. The Executive
|
||
Summary, Past Performance Survey, Compliance Matrix, and Security Plan will not
|
||
count towards page limit. The Executive Summary will be limited to a maximum of two
|
||
pages. Each Past Performance Reference will be limited to two pages.
|
||
132
|
||
|
||
Provide one original hard copy, and one electronic copy. Offerors shall format their
|
||
technical proposals strictly in accordance with the following:
|
||
133
|
||
|
||
Technical Proposal Format
|
||
Executive Summary
|
||
Section A – Technical Excellence
|
||
A.1 Interoperability
|
||
A.1.1 Inlay (C7.2.2)
|
||
A.2 Durability
|
||
A.2.1 Warranty (C6)
|
||
A.2.2 EP Book Cover with Embedded Inlay (C7.2)
|
||
A.3 Security
|
||
A.3.1 Inlay Security (C7.2.2.4)
|
||
A.3.2 Production Facility and Transport Security (C7.2.2.4)
|
||
A.4 Design & Integration into EP
|
||
A.4.1 EP Book Covers Sheets – Requirements EP Book Cover Sheets Physical Characteristics (C7.2.1)
|
||
A4.2 Inlay
|
||
(cid:131) Standards (C7.2.2.1)
|
||
(cid:131) Inlay Physical Characteristics (C7.2.2.2)
|
||
(cid:131) Inlay Functional Characteristics (Operating System, micro-Controller/Processor, Memory ,
|
||
Functionality) (C7.2.2.3)
|
||
A.4.2 Testing
|
||
(cid:131) Stage 1 Testing to be met by Offeror as Part of the Proposal (C7.2.3.1)
|
||
(cid:131) Stage 2 Testing in Preparation for Pilot (C7.2.3.1)
|
||
(cid:131) Stage 3 Testing during Pilot (Field Test) (C7.2.3.1)
|
||
(cid:131) Stage 4 Testing under Normal Operations (C7.2.3.1)
|
||
A.4.3 Manufacturing
|
||
(cid:131) Manufacturing Consumables (C7.6.3)
|
||
(cid:131) Manufacturing (C7.6.4)
|
||
(cid:131) Standards (C7.6.4.1)
|
||
(cid:131) Quality Assurance (C7.6.4.2)
|
||
A.4.4 Adhesive (C7.4)
|
||
A.4.5 Delivery Preparations to Government or Authorized Agent (C7.6.2)
|
||
A.5 Availability (C4.1, C7.5, L4)
|
||
A.6 Technical Support (C7.5)
|
||
A.7 General
|
||
A.7.1 Personalization System Development/Test Kit (C7.1)
|
||
A.7.2 IC Readers for GPO (C7.3)
|
||
Section B – Experience
|
||
B.1 Smart Card Technology Experience
|
||
B.2 14443 Standards and Interoperability Specifications Experience
|
||
B.3 ICAO Specifications Experience
|
||
B.4 Past Performance with Contracts of Similar Size, Scope, and Complexity
|
||
Section C – Management Approach
|
||
C.1 Electronic Passport (EP) Cover Development, Testing, Manufacturing, and Delivery
|
||
C.2 Engineering Support
|
||
C.3 Quality and Security Control
|
||
Appendix A: Compliance Matrix
|
||
Appendix B: Past Performance References
|
||
Appendix C: Test Requirements Check List
|
||
Appendix D: Security Plan
|
||
134
|
||
|
||
Compliance matrix
|
||
A requirements compliance matrix, attached in Section J, will be filled out, with cross-
|
||
referencing to proposal text (line numbers), and will be included as an appendix to each
|
||
Offeror’s proposal. The compliance matrix shall be used only to show compliance and
|
||
shall not be used to describe or elaborate upon the Offeror’s capabilities, thus it will not
|
||
be counted toward page limit.
|
||
Past Performance
|
||
In Appendix B, the Offeror and any proposed Subcontractor (s) shall list a maximum of 5
|
||
past performance citations for either ongoing Government prime contracts and
|
||
subcontracts for the same or, similar work, completed in the past three (3) years.
|
||
Pertinent work under non-Government contracts may also be included. In order to
|
||
evaluate past performance, it is critical that the Government have complete and accurate
|
||
information on organizations for which the Offeror has previously performed work. To
|
||
facilitate these checks, the Offeror shall ensure the accuracy of these references. The
|
||
Offeror and the proposed Subcontractor (s) shall furnish the following for each of the
|
||
cited contracts:
|
||
1. Customer’s Name and Address
|
||
2. Telephone and facsimile numbers of the Contracting Officer and the Contracting
|
||
Officer’s Representative
|
||
3. Contract Number
|
||
4. Contract Type
|
||
5. Contract Amount
|
||
6. Contract Effective Date and Completion Date
|
||
7. Place(s) of Performance
|
||
8. Number of Professional/Technical Personnel
|
||
9. Description of Contract Work, Scope, and Responsibilities
|
||
10. Statement of how the contract work is the same as or similar to the required work.
|
||
It is not sufficient to simply state that it is the same or similar in scope or
|
||
magnitude.
|
||
11. Performance - Offerors should not provide general information on their
|
||
performance on the identified contracts. General performance information will be
|
||
135
|
||
|
||
obtained from the references. The Offeror should provide information on
|
||
exceptional events or circumstances, positive or negative, associated with the
|
||
contract, for example: cost overrun/underrun information, information on default
|
||
or termination for the convenience of the client, awards or outstanding
|
||
achievements, examples of effective and timely performance, etc.
|
||
12. List of major subcontractors – identify percentage share of work performed by
|
||
each subcontractor.
|
||
Security Plan
|
||
In Appendix D of the proposal, the Offeror shall provide a security plan. The plan will
|
||
not be reviewed as part of the Technical Evaluations. It will however be reviewed by the
|
||
appropriate U.S. Government security entity. Section J of this RFP has an example of a
|
||
security plan to provide the Offeror information on the level of detail expected in the
|
||
Offeror’s plan.
|
||
L.5.2.2 Content Requirements
|
||
Offerors shall provide, in the format described above in L 5.2.1,
|
||
a detailed written technical proposal addressing the
|
||
following areas:
|
||
a) Technical Excellence, including responsiveness to SOW requirements and ability to
|
||
meet delivery schedule. While we expect a reply to each of the requirements in the
|
||
statement of work, proposals shall describe approach in greater detail for the
|
||
following major categories:
|
||
i. Interoperability
|
||
ii. Durability (both physical and electronic)
|
||
iii. Security
|
||
iv. Design and Integration into EP
|
||
v. Availability
|
||
vi. Technical Support
|
||
vii. General
|
||
b) Experience, including:
|
||
i. Overall experience with contact/contactless smart card technology
|
||
ii. Experience with ISO 14443 and its referenced standards and
|
||
interoperability specifications
|
||
iii. Experience with ICAO specifications/recommendations
|
||
iv. Past Performance with Contracts of Similar Size, Scope, and Complexity
|
||
c) Management Approach including:
|
||
i. EP Book Cover development, testing, manufacturing, and delivery in
|
||
time to meet the Milestone deadlines specified in Section F
|
||
ii. Engineering support
|
||
136
|
||
|
||
iii. Quality and security control
|
||
L5.3 Past Performance Surveys Submitted by Offeror’s
|
||
References
|
||
Each Offeror will be evaluated on its performance, and that of any significant
|
||
Subcontractors, under existing and prior contracts for similar products or services. The
|
||
Government will focus on information that demonstrates quality of performance relative
|
||
to the size and complexity of the procurement under consideration. The Past
|
||
Performance Survey identified in Section J will be used to collect this information. The
|
||
Offeror will provide the references identified in Appendix B of its Technical Proposal
|
||
with the Past Performance Survey and request that it be completed by the reference and
|
||
returned directly to GPO at the address on the survey by TBD. Telephonic interviews
|
||
may also be conducted if necessary. References other than those identified by the
|
||
Offeror may be contracted by the Government and the information received used in the
|
||
evaluation of the Offeror’s past performance.
|
||
L.6 TYPE OF ORDER
|
||
A (Fixed Price, Cost Reimbursable, and Time and Materials) task order will be awarded
|
||
as a result of this solicitation.
|
||
137
|
||
|
||
SECTION – D PREPARATION, PACKAGING AND MARKING
|
||
NOT APPLICABLE
|
||
138
|
||
|
||
SECTION- E – INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE
|
||
NOT APPLICABLE
|
||
139
|
||
|
||
Section F – DELIVERABLE SCHEDULE
|
||
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE (U.S. GPO
|
||
DELIVERABLE SCHEDULE
|
||
ELECTRONIC (INTEGRATED CIRCUIT (IC) EMBEDDED) PASSPORT
|
||
COVERS
|
||
140
|
||
|
||
F. Base Year
|
||
Item Amount Delivery Date
|
||
Personalization System Test Kit 7 Within 1 day of
|
||
(CLIN 0001) (Mandatory) contract award
|
||
EP Book Cover Sheets for Test 700 Within 10
|
||
Book Production (CLIN 0002) working days
|
||
(Mandatory) of contract award
|
||
Readers for U.S. GPO (CLIN 1-50 Within 10
|
||
0003) working days
|
||
(Optional) of contract award
|
||
Technical Support (CLIN 0004) 80 - 4000 hrs. As needed
|
||
On-Call (Mandatory)
|
||
EP Book Cover Sheets for SIA 1,000 - 20,000 EP Book Cover Within 40
|
||
Pilot (CLIN 0005) (Optional) sheets (3,000 - 60,000) EP Book working days after
|
||
Covers) receipt of order.
|
||
EP Book Cover sheets for 1,000 to 2.9 million EP Book Within 40 days
|
||
Domestic Agency Pilot and Full Cover Sheets after receipt of
|
||
Agency Deployment (CLIN order.
|
||
0006) (Optional)
|
||
Adhesive (Testing) (CLIN 0007) Sufficient quantity of adhesive to Within 10
|
||
(Mandatory) attach EP Book Cover to inside working days of
|
||
end page material for identified contract award
|
||
quantity of book covers for book
|
||
testing plus spoilage. Under
|
||
current production conditions, one
|
||
gallon of adhesive will produce
|
||
1500 three-up cover strips.
|
||
Adhesive (SIA Pilot) (CLIN Sufficient quantity of adhesive to Within 40
|
||
0007) (Mandatory) attach EP Book Cover to inside working days after
|
||
end page material for identified receipt of order
|
||
quantity of book covers for the
|
||
SIA pilot plus spoilage. Under
|
||
current production conditions, one
|
||
gallon of adhesive will produce
|
||
1500 three-up cover strips
|
||
Adhesive (Domestic Agency Sufficient quantity of adhesive in Within 40
|
||
Pilot and Full Agency 55-gallon drums to attach EP working days after
|
||
Deployment) (CLIN 0008) Book Cover to inside end page receipt of order.
|
||
(Optional) material for identified quantity of
|
||
book covers for Domestic Agency
|
||
Pilot and Full Agency
|
||
Deployment . Under current
|
||
141
|
||
|
||
Item Amount Delivery Date
|
||
production conditions, one gallon
|
||
of adhesive will produce 1500
|
||
three-up cover strips.
|
||
Travel (CLIN 0009) (Optional) As Needed
|
||
Extended Warranty (CLIN As Needed
|
||
00010) (5Year) (Optional)
|
||
Extended Warranty (CLIN As Needed
|
||
00011) (10 Year) (Optional)
|
||
F1. Option Year One
|
||
Item Amount Delivery Date
|
||
Readers for U.S. GPO (CLIN 1-50 As needed
|
||
1003)
|
||
(Optional)
|
||
Electronic Passport (EP) Book 1,000 Within 40
|
||
Cover Sheets for Full to 1 million EP Book Cover working days after
|
||
Production (CLIN 1006) Sheets receipt of order.
|
||
(Optional)
|
||
1 – 2.5 million EP Book Cover
|
||
Sheets
|
||
2.5 – 3.5 million EP Book Cover
|
||
Sheets
|
||
Technical Support (CLIN 1004) Est. As needed
|
||
(Mandatory) 80 – 4000 hrs.
|
||
Adhesive (for full production) Sufficient quantity of adhesive in Within 40 days
|
||
(CLIN 1008) (Optional) 55-gallon drums to attach EP after receipt of
|
||
Book Cover to inside end page order.
|
||
material for identified quantity of
|
||
book covers ordered in CLIN
|
||
1006
|
||
Travel - (CLIN 1009) (Optional) As Needed
|
||
Extended Warranties As Needed
|
||
(CLIN10010) (5Year) (Optional)
|
||
Extended Warranty (CLIN As Needed
|
||
142
|
||
|
||
Item Amount Delivery Date
|
||
10011) (10 Year) (Optional)
|
||
F2. Option Year Two
|
||
Item Amount Delivery Date
|
||
Readers for U.S. GPO (CLIN 1-50 As needed
|
||
2003)
|
||
(Optional)
|
||
Electronic Passport (EP) Book 1,000 Within 40
|
||
Cover Sheets for Full to 1 million EP Book Cover working days after
|
||
Production (CLIN 2006) Sheets receipt of order.
|
||
(Optional)
|
||
1-2.8 million EP Book Cover
|
||
Sheets
|
||
2.8 – 3.8 million EP Book Cover
|
||
Sheets
|
||
Technical Support (CLIN 2004) Est. As needed
|
||
(Mandatory) 80 – 4000 hrs.
|
||
Adhesive (for full production) Sufficient quantity of adhesive in Within 40 days
|
||
(CLIN 2008) (Optional) 55-gallon drums to attach EP after receipt of
|
||
Book Cover to inside end page order.
|
||
material for identified quantity of
|
||
book covers ordered in CLIN
|
||
2006
|
||
Travel - (CLIN 2009) (Optional) As Needed
|
||
Extended Warranties (CLIN As Needed
|
||
20010) (5 Year) (Optional)
|
||
Extended Warranty (CLIN As Needed
|
||
20011) (10 Year) (Optional)
|
||
F3. Option Year Three
|
||
Item Amount Delivery Date
|
||
Readers for U.S. GPO (CLIN 1-50 As needed
|
||
3003)
|
||
(Optional)
|
||
143
|
||
|
||
Item Amount Delivery Date
|
||
Electronic Passport (EP) Book 1,000 Within 40
|
||
Cover Sheets for Full to 1 million EP Book Cover working days after
|
||
Production (CLIN 3006) Sheets receipt of order.
|
||
(Optional)
|
||
1 –3.1 million EP Book Cover
|
||
Sheets
|
||
3.1 – 4.1 million EP Book Cover
|
||
Sheets
|
||
Technical Support (CLIN 3004) Est. As needed
|
||
(Mandatory) 80 – 4000 hrs.
|
||
Adhesive (for full production) Sufficient quantity of adhesive in Within 40 days
|
||
(CLIN 3008) (Optional) 55-gallon drums to attach EP after receipt of
|
||
Book Cover to inside end page order.
|
||
material for identified quantity of
|
||
book covers ordered in CLIN
|
||
3006
|
||
Travel - (CLIN 3009) (Optional) As Needed
|
||
Extended Warranties (CLIN As Needed
|
||
30010) (5 Year) (Optional)
|
||
Extended Warranty (CLIN As Needed
|
||
30011) (10 Year) (Optional)
|
||
F4. Option Year Four
|
||
Item Amount Delivery Date
|
||
Readers for U.S. GPO (CLIN 1-50 As needed
|
||
4003)
|
||
(Optional)
|
||
144
|
||
|
||
Item Amount Delivery Date
|
||
Electronic Passport (EP) Book 1,000 Within 40
|
||
Cover Sheets for Full to 1 million EP Book Cover working days after
|
||
Production (CLIN 4006) Sheets receipt of order.
|
||
(Optional)
|
||
1 – 3.4 million EP Book Cover
|
||
Sheets
|
||
3.4 – 4.4 million EP Book Cover
|
||
Sheets
|
||
Technical Support (CLIN 4004) Est. As needed
|
||
(Mandatory) 80 – 4000 hrs.
|
||
Adhesive (for full production) Sufficient quantity of adhesive in Within 40 days
|
||
(CLIN 4008) (Optional) 55-gallon drums to attach EP after receipt of
|
||
Book Cover to inside end page order.
|
||
material for identified quantity of
|
||
book covers ordered in CLIN:
|
||
4006
|
||
Travel - (CLIN 4009) (Optional) As Needed
|
||
Extended Warranties (CLIN As Needed
|
||
40010) (5 Year) (Optional)
|
||
Extended Warranty (CLIN As Needed
|
||
40011) (10 Year) (Optional)
|
||
145
|
||
|
||
SECTION - G - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA
|
||
1. Contracting Officer (CO) Herbert Jackson, Jr.
|
||
(202) 512-0937
|
||
2. Contract Specialist Albertha Broadnax
|
||
(202) 512-0966
|
||
3. Invoices US Government Printing Office
|
||
Comptroller
|
||
North Capitol & H Streets NW
|
||
Mail Stop: FMCS
|
||
Washington, DC 20401
|
||
(202) 512-0874 - LOCAL
|
||
1-800-BILLGPO (1-800-245-5476)
|
||
5. Payment
|
||
Payments under this contract will be made by the
|
||
Government by electronic funds transfer (EFT). If EFT is requested, please call 1-800-
|
||
BILLGPO.
|
||
NOTICE:
|
||
The following solicitation provisions and/or contract clauses pertinent to this section are hereby
|
||
incorporated by reference:
|
||
Material ACQUISITION REGULATION (48 CFR CHAPTER 1)
|
||
NUMBER DATE TITLE
|
||
52.232.28 APR 1989 ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFER
|
||
PAYMENT METHOD.
|
||
Effective January 1, 1999 payments on all GPO purchase orders will only be made by electronic
|
||
fund transfer (EFT) unless you are granted a waiver. A waiver can only be granted if you certify
|
||
below in writing that you do not have an account with a financial institution or an authorized
|
||
payment agent and return the certification to the Contracting Officer.
|
||
REQUEST FOR WAIVER/CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION
|
||
I certify that I do not have an account with a financial institution or an authorized payment agent.
|
||
____________________________________________________________
|
||
Signature and date
|
||
146
|
||
|
||
SECTION - H - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
|
||
1. Minimum Bid Acceptance Period
|
||
a. "Acceptance period" as used in this provision, means the number of calendar
|
||
days available to the Government for awarding a contract from the date specified
|
||
in this solicitation for receipt of bids.
|
||
b. This provision supersedes any language pertaining to the acceptance period that
|
||
may appear elsewhere in this solicitation.
|
||
c. The Government requires a minimum acceptance period of 60 calendar days.
|
||
d. In the space provided immediately below, bidders may specify a longer
|
||
acceptance period than the Government's minimum requirement.
|
||
A bid allows the following acceptance period: ................. calendar days.
|
||
e. A bid allowing less than the Government's minimum acceptance period will be
|
||
rejected.
|
||
f. The bidder agrees to execute all that it has undertaken to do, in compliance with
|
||
the bid, if that bid is accepted in writing within (1) the acceptance period stated in
|
||
paragraph c. above or (2) any longer acceptance period stated in paragraph d.
|
||
above.
|
||
PRE-AWARD SURVEY
|
||
So that the Government may be assured each bidder can satisfy the requirements of this
|
||
Schedule, it reserves the right (1) to conduct a pre-award survey on any or all bidders,
|
||
and (2) to consider the results of such survey in any determination to award.
|
||
a. A pre-award shall establish the contractor’s competence in technical, managerial,
|
||
financial and similar areas related to the bidder’s ability to perform.
|
||
b. The Contractor is expected to cooperate in the pre-award and to provide all such
|
||
reasonable information as maybe necessary to its purposes.
|
||
c. Only those bids from proven or obviously capable suppliers are solicited.
|
||
Key Personnel
|
||
The personnel designated in the contract schedule are considered essential to the work being
|
||
performed under this contract. Before removing, replacing or diverting any of the proposed or
|
||
specified personnel, the contractor will (1) notify the Contracting Officer within 5 days in advance
|
||
and (2) submit justification (including proposed substitution) in sufficient detail to permit
|
||
evaluation of the impact on the contract.
|
||
The Contractor shall make no diversion without the Contracting Officer’s written consent;
|
||
provided that the Contracting Officer may ratify in writing the change, and that ratification shall
|
||
constitute Contract Officer’s consent required by this clause.
|
||
The list of personnel specified in the contract schedule may, with the consent of the contracting
|
||
parties, be amended from time to time during the course of the contract to add and delete
|
||
personnel.
|
||
List here the personnel essential unless they are specified in the contract schedule.
|
||
147
|
||
|
||
SECTION M – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
|
||
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE (GPO)
|
||
Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors
|
||
148
|
||
|
||
ELECTRONIC (INTEGRATED CIRCUIT (IC) EMBEDDED)
|
||
PASSPORT COVERS
|
||
M1 General Selection and Award Conditions
|
||
This section describes the technical and price factors for proposal evaluation.
|
||
M.1 Evaluation
|
||
a) The Government anticipates awarding a contract to the Offeror(s) whose proposal
|
||
is the most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.
|
||
b) Technical proposals will be evaluated based on the factors described in Section
|
||
M4.3.2. Technical and Price are equally important. Award may be made to other
|
||
than the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal.
|
||
c) Written proposal clarification or explanation requests may be issued by the
|
||
Contracting Officer (CO), after initial technical evaluation is completed, in order
|
||
to fully access and evaluate the merits of proposal submitted.
|
||
d) The Government reserves the right to consider as acceptable only a proposal that
|
||
is submitted in accordance with all requirements set forth or referenced in this
|
||
RFP. The Offeror shall demonstrate an understanding of all requirements and a
|
||
capability to provide the required services. An Offeror that fails to fulfill all
|
||
requirements shall not be eligible for contract award. The Government reserves
|
||
the right to reject a proposal that does not address the totality of the RFP
|
||
requirements.
|
||
e) The Government may award this contract without discussions. Accordingly, the
|
||
RFP offer should be submitted on the most favorable price and technical terms
|
||
that the offering firm and team arrangement can submit to the Government.
|
||
M.2 Bases for Award and Ordering
|
||
M.2.1 Basis for Award
|
||
The following conditions must be met in order for the Offeror to be eligible for award of
|
||
the contract:
|
||
• The responses to the RFP must comply in all material respects with law,
|
||
regulation and all requirements set forth in the RFP; and
|
||
• The responses to the RFP must be determined responsive according to the
|
||
standards in FAR Subpart 9.1. This selection will be based on how well each
|
||
response satisfies the evaluation criteria as described in the paragraphs below.
|
||
M.2.2 Basis for Ordering
|
||
149
|
||
|
||
After award (multiple awards are expected) Offerors’ products will be evaluated in lab
|
||
and field tests before orders are made for the Pilots and Full Agency Deployment of the
|
||
EP starting in late CY2004 and reaching completion at all domestic issuance agencies
|
||
and centers by December 2005.
|
||
Lab Testing of Test Books in Preparation for Pilots
|
||
DoS, U.S. GPO and NIST will conduct the first round of post-award evaluations to
|
||
determine how well EP Book Cover Sheets perform in terms of book fabrication,
|
||
personalization, and inspection, with special attention on the physical durability of the EP
|
||
Book. The maroon book cover sheets delivered on day ten after award will be used by
|
||
U.S. GPO to fabricate Test Books. U.S. GPO will observe and record how each Offeror’s
|
||
product passes through and performs in the book fabrication process. DoS will
|
||
personalize the resulting test books with dummy data observing and recording the
|
||
performance of each Offeror’s product in the personalization and inspection processes
|
||
including; TOPPAN printing, fraud, and security test. NIST will subject a number of the
|
||
personalized test books to various physical tests to investigate the durability of the
|
||
Offeror’s product in a finished EP book.
|
||
Many of these lab tests will continue after the first round of post-award evaluations.
|
||
Field Test of Issued EP Books during Pilots
|
||
Based on the results of the lab tests, DoS will purchase EP Book Cover Sheets for EP
|
||
book operational field testing. The operation field testing will occur during the two Pilots:
|
||
the issuance of official EPs beginning in December 2004 at SIA (SIA Pilot) followed by
|
||
the issuance of tourist EPs at one domestic issuing agency (Domestic Agency Pilot) in
|
||
early CY2005. The performance of each Offeror’s product will be observed and recorded
|
||
in U.S. GPO book fabrication, DoS personalization and in use/inspection.
|
||
The results of all the lab and field testing, in conjunction with offered costs, will be used
|
||
in choosing products for Full Agency Deployment.
|
||
M.3 Award on Initial Proposals
|
||
The Government may award this contract without discussions, according to the
|
||
provisions of FAR Part 15.610. Accordingly, the RFP offer should be submitted on the
|
||
most favorable price and technical terms that the offering firm and team arrangement can
|
||
submit to the Government.
|
||
M.4 Evaluation Criteria
|
||
M.4.1 General
|
||
150
|
||
|
||
The evaluation will be based on an integrated assessment of the information submitted in
|
||
the Offeror’s proposal. The integrated assessment will address mandatory requirements,
|
||
terms and conditions, technical factors and price.
|
||
M4.2 Risk Assessment
|
||
The integrated assessment of proposals will include a risk assessment for the Overall
|
||
Technical and Price. The Government will assess the technical risk associated with the
|
||
Offeror’s proposal for schedule, price and performance/delivery.
|
||
M.4.3 Best Value Evaluation Methodology
|
||
Evaluation will be made on two selection factors – Technical and Price. In the evaluation,
|
||
technical and price are equally important.
|
||
M.4.3.1 COST PROPOSAL EVALUATION
|
||
Offerors' cost proposals will be evaluated to determine cost realism and reasonableness.
|
||
Costs that are excessively high or low may be considered unrealistic and unreasonable,
|
||
and may receive no further consideration.
|
||
M.4.3.2 TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
|
||
In rating the technical proposals, the following three technical factors (Technical
|
||
Excellence, Experience, and Management Approach) are listed in descending order of
|
||
importance. Experience and Technical Excellence combined are significantly more
|
||
important than Management Approach.
|
||
A. Technical Excellence includes responsiveness to SOW requirements and ability to
|
||
meet delivery schedule. While we expect a reply to each of the requirements in
|
||
the SOW proposals shall describe approach in greater detail for the following
|
||
categories in descending order of importance.
|
||
i. Interoperability: Offeror’s ability to provide a solution that meets all the
|
||
appropriate ICAO recommendations and Government standards related
|
||
to interoperability specified in section C.
|
||
ii. Durability: Offeror’s ability to provide a solution that meets all the
|
||
appropriate durability requirements specified in section C including the
|
||
10 year physical durability of the EP.
|
||
iii. Security: Offeror’s ability to provide a solution that meets all the
|
||
appropriate security requirements specified in section C.
|
||
iv. Design & Integration into EP: Offeror’s ability to provide a solution that
|
||
meets all the appropriate design and book integration requirements
|
||
specified in section C.
|
||
v. Availability: Offeror’s ability to provide a solution that meets all the
|
||
appropriate availability requirements specified in section C.
|
||
151
|
||
|
||
vi. Technical Support: Offeror’s ability to provide on call technical support
|
||
for the duration of the contract.
|
||
vii. General: Offeror’s ability to adequately address the following items.
|
||
• Providing IC electronic passport readers.
|
||
• Government right to modify the stated EP Book Cover
|
||
requirement to take advantage of technological improvements
|
||
that enable increased performance or capacity.
|
||
• Requirements for specialized and/or non-COTS hardware,
|
||
software, and consumables
|
||
• Availability and redundancy of production operations
|
||
B. Experience, including;
|
||
i. Overall experience with contact/contactless smart card technology
|
||
ii. Experience with 14443 standards and interoperability specifications
|
||
iii. Experience with ICAO specifications
|
||
iv. Past Performance with Contracts of Similar Size, Scope, and Complexity
|
||
The Offeror’s past performance will be evaluated using the following:
|
||
Quality of Product and/or Service
|
||
Timeliness of Performance
|
||
Price/Cost Control
|
||
Business Relations
|
||
Customer Satisfaction
|
||
Information will be obtained from the references listed in each
|
||
Offeror’s proposal, other customers known to the Government, consumer
|
||
protection organizations, and others who may have useful and relevant
|
||
knowledge of the Offeror’s past performance. At the discretion of the
|
||
Government, the past performance of significant subcontractors may also
|
||
be evaluated.
|
||
In evaluating past performance, the Government will consider the
|
||
available information and give it such weight as it deems appropriate.
|
||
Favorable and unfavorable references for an Offeror will not be averaged.
|
||
One unfavorable reference, if deemed by the Government to be reliable
|
||
and relevant to performance of the solicited products/services, may be the
|
||
basis for a negative evaluation notwithstanding other more positive
|
||
information. Conversely, a reliable and relevant favorable reference may
|
||
be given substantial weight in a positive evaluation.
|
||
C. Management Approach including the degree in which the Offeror can
|
||
demonstrate its ability to:
|
||
i. Develop, test, manufacture, and deliver the EP Book Covers in time to
|
||
meet the schedule specified in Section F.
|
||
ii. Technical support services for the full life cycle of the EP
|
||
iii. Quality and security control
|
||
152
|