Unbounded essence/item farming: every other reward trigger (summon,
question, fragment) had both a per-user and per-IP limiter, but
ritual_start and judgment had none at all — and judgment has no
"already resolved" state either. A scripted client could replay
{"type":"judgment","verdict":"cross_over"} in a tight loop and mint
CROSS_OVER_ESSENCE (25) plus a 20% item roll every iteration, forever.
Same for ritual_start -> 4x ritual_step. Added ritual/judgment limiters
in both flavors, matching the existing pattern.
WS session crash: _handle_question did `if state.entity is None:
await _handle_summon(state)` then `assert state.entity is not None`.
_handle_summon returns early *without* setting state.entity when the
seeker is rate-limited, so the assert fired unhandled — and the message
loop only catches WebSocketDisconnect, so it killed the whole connection.
Reachable with no malice: click summon a few times impatiently, then ask a
question. Now returns cleanly (the rate_limited frame was already sent).
Essence double-spend: purchase_unlock() deliberately uses SELECT ... FOR
UPDATE to serialize concurrent purchases, but the three credit_essence
call sites in ws.py did an unlocked db.get() read-modify-write. An
unlocked read doesn't block on a row lock, so a reward computed from a
pre-purchase balance could be written after the purchase committed,
silently reverting the deduction — user keeps the unlock and the essence.
All three now lock the row the same way.
Entity mint collision: _summon does a racy check-then-insert against
Entity.signature and Entity.name, both DB-unique, with no IntegrityError
handling — a concurrent mint of the same signature crashed the session.
Forceable by a user with two accounts (anomaly frequency/magnitude are
client-controlled), and plausible without malice in wire mode, where
sample_network() reads host-wide /proc/net/dev counters so two idle
sessions genuinely measure the same traffic. Now retries once, which
re-runs the match against whatever the winner committed.
Also added a unique constraint on unlocks(user_id, unlock_key) as
defense-in-depth, with an idempotent catalog-guarded migration.
221 backend tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
f8ca4bbd9e