Merge Workstream J: RTL-SDR experimental firmware module

Resolved add/add conflict in the top-level firmware README: both I and J
created one (J's brief said "create it if I hasn't", and both ran in
isolated worktrees with no visibility into each other). Combined them —
kept I's comprehensive core-project README as the base, appended J's real
RTL-SDR technical section, dropped J's now-stale "Status of this
directory" preamble (written when it couldn't see I's already-completed
work) and its duplicate honesty-policy note. Updated the stale
components/README.md placeholder to reflect that the module now exists.
This commit is contained in:
Indiana
2026-07-24 20:49:31 +00:00
6 changed files with 1388 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@@ -296,6 +296,269 @@ in `value` with the richer distance/energy data folded into `metadata`
## Out of scope here
Per the spec: thermal camera support, a full BLE/Wi-Fi-AP provisioning UX,
on-device spectrum analysis/FFT, the RTL-SDR module (Workstream J — see
`components/README.md`), and anything on the backend/frontend side
(Workstreams G, H, K).
on-device spectrum analysis/FFT (the RTL-SDR module below forwards raw IQ
upstream rather than analyzing on-device), and anything on the
backend/frontend side (Workstreams G, H, K).
---
## Workstream J — RTL-SDR experimental module
**⚠️ This is the least certain part of the entire firmware build. Read
this whole section before touching it.**
### What this is
A clearly-separated, opt-in, experimental module exploring USB-host
communication with an RTL2832U-based SDR dongle over the ESP32-P4's
native USB-OTG host controller (USB Host Library, `usb_host.h` — a real,
documented capability of this specific chip, unlike most ESP32 variants).
The idea, per the design spec: attach a cheap RTL-SDR dongle to the
sensor node, treat "spirit radio scanning" as a hardware-backed mode
instead of only a browser WebUSB feature.
**Be honest about the real constraint (this is the spec's framing, and
it's correct):** wideband IQ sample rates and FFT processing are
demanding relative to an MCU's compute, even one with ESP32-P4's AI
accelerator. **On-device spectrum analysis is not what this module
attempts.** The realistic architecture — and the one implemented here —
is: pull raw IQ samples off the dongle via USB host, and forward them
upstream for the *backend* to FFT/analyze (the same job the browser
already does client-side today via `frontend/src/lib/fft.ts` +
`frontend/src/lib/sdr.ts`'s `SpectrumAnomalyDetector`). Even that
"just pass the bytes through" architecture needs real USB throughput
numbers to know if it's viable — see "What's unverified" below.
### Primary reference
`frontend/src/lib/sdr.ts` — this repo's existing browser-based (WebUSB)
RTL2832U + R820T driver. It's real, already-researched protocol detail
against the public librtlsdr register documentation (vendor commands,
I2C-repeater tuner access, the demod/tuner init sequence), itself marked
`HARDWARE PASS REQUIRED` since it's never been run against a real dongle
either. This firmware module is a direct **port** of that file's control-
transfer sequence from WebUSB JS calls to ESP-IDF USB Host Library C
calls — line-by-line correspondences are called out in code comments
(e.g. `rtlsdr_run_init_sequence()` mirrors `open()` in sdr.ts almost
register-for-register). It intentionally does not re-derive any register
math from scratch; wherever sdr.ts says "simplified" or "HARDWARE PASS
REQUIRED" (e.g. the R820T PLL frequency math, the demod resample-ratio
math), this module carries the exact same simplification forward with the
exact same caveat, rather than inventing new unverified math on top of
already-unverified math.
### What's implemented (structurally — see caveats below)
1. **USB Host Library lifecycle** (`rtlsdr_exp_start()` /
`rtlsdr_usb_lib_daemon_task()` / `rtlsdr_exp_client_task()`):
`usb_host_install()`, `usb_host_client_register()` with an async event
callback, and the two-task pump pattern the USB Host Library's async
model requires (one task for `usb_host_lib_handle_events()`, one for
`usb_host_client_handle_events()` — the latter also being how this
module's own control- and bulk-transfer completion callbacks get
dispatched, since the Library calls them synchronously from whichever
task is pumping events, not from a hidden thread or ISR).
2. **RTL2832U/Terratec device enumeration and vendor-ID matching**
(`rtlsdr_try_bring_up()`, `rtlsdr_vendor_id_matches()`): on a
`USB_HOST_CLIENT_EVENT_NEW_DEV` event, opens the device, reads its
device descriptor, and matches `idVendor` against `0x0BDA`
(RTL2832U) / `0x0CCD` (Terratec-rebadged) — ported directly from
`sdr.ts`'s `requestDevice()` filter list (`RTL2832U_VENDOR`,
`TERRATEC_VENDOR`). Faithfully carries over that file's specific
choice to filter by **vendor ID only**, not product ID (its comment:
"many dongles report product ids outside the handful we know, so
filtering by productId hides them from the picker") — the known
product-id list (`RTLSDR_EXP_KNOWN_PRODUCT_IDS`) is kept as an
informational log line only, never a hard filter, exactly mirroring
how `RTL2832U_PRODUCTS` is exported-but-unused-as-a-filter in
`sdr.ts`.
3. **RTL2832U init vendor-command sequence** over USB control transfers
(`rtlsdr_run_init_sequence()`, `rtlsdr_demod_write()`,
`rtlsdr_reg_write()`, `rtlsdr_i2c_write()`, `rtlsdr_exp_set_frequency()`,
`rtlsdr_exp_set_sample_rate()`): the same demod soft-reset → demod_ctl/
suspend-off block → standby-off → AGC-mode → R820T tuner power-up
(through the I2C repeater) → sample-rate program → initial tune →
streaming-endpoint reset → test-mode-off sequence as `sdr.ts`'s
`open()`, with the same register addresses/values and the same
`wValue`/`wIndex` encoding (`(block<<8)|0x10` / `(page<<8)|address`),
translated from `USBDevice.controlTransferOut()` to
`usb_host_transfer_submit_control()` with a manually-built
`usb_setup_packet_t`.
4. **A basic bulk-transfer read loop structure** for pulling IQ sample
data off the device (`rtlsdr_start_bulk_streaming()`,
`rtlsdr_bulk_xfer_cb()`): unlike `sdr.ts` (which does one-shot
`await dev.transferIn(...)` calls from inside its own async `sweep()`
loop), the USB Host Library is callback-driven, so continuous
streaming here is a small pipeline — N transfers (`bulk_read_queue_
depth`, default 4) of a fixed chunk size (`bulk_read_chunk_bytes`,
default 16384B, enforced as a multiple of 512 the same way `sdr.ts`'s
`readSamples()` comment requires) are kept perpetually in flight; each
completion callback copies the received bytes into a heap block, hands
it to a FreeRTOS queue for the forward task, and immediately resubmits
itself to keep the pipe full. **This is the part most likely to need
real-hardware tuning** — see below.
5. **A stub/structure for forwarding raw IQ data upstream**
(`rtlsdr_exp_forward_iq_block()`, `rtlsdr_forward_task()`) — see the
architecture decision writeup immediately below.
### IQ-forwarding architecture decision
The spec explicitly leaves this as a product-judgment call ("your call on
whether this warrants a separate endpoint/stream vs. reusing the sensor
telemetry shape with a binary/base64 payload"). Decision made here:
**a separate binary stream/endpoint, not a reuse of the JSON telemetry
shape.** Reasoning:
- **Raw throughput is the wrong order of magnitude for the telemetry
contract.** Even a modest 2.048 Msps capture at 8 bits/sample/channel
(RTL2832U's native ADC format) is interleaved I/Q bytes at roughly
4.1 MB/s. The design spec's `POST /api/device/telemetry` contract caps
the `readings` array at ~64 entries, caps the request body at ~16KB,
and rate-limits ingestion to roughly 1 request/second sustained per
device — sized for a handful of scalar sensor readings (temperature,
humidity, presence booleans), not a continuous multi-megabyte/second
binary stream. Forcing IQ data through that shape would mean either
violating those caps (defeating their whole purpose — bounding what a
misbehaving/malicious device can push at the backend) or chopping IQ
into thousands of tiny requests per second, which is worse for both
sides than one continuous stream.
- **Base64-in-JSON adds ~33% size overhead** on top of a payload that's
already too large for the telemetry shape, for no benefit — there's no
reason to pay text-encoding tax on a payload nothing needs to
eyeball as text.
- **It's a fundamentally different kind of data with different backend
handling needs.** Telemetry readings feed the anomaly-detection
baseline/threshold pipeline directly and cheaply (a few floats per
sensor). IQ data needs FFT processing before it's useful for anything
— an entirely different backend code path (closer to how the browser's
own `powerSpectrumDb()` + `SpectrumAnomalyDetector` work today,
server-side instead of client-side). Conflating the two request shapes
would couple two things that should scale, rate-limit, and fail
independently.
Given that, this module's stub (`rtlsdr_exp_forward_iq_block()`) targets
a **separate, currently-hypothetical** endpoint (`iq_upload_url` in
`rtlsdr_exp_config_t`, suggested path `/api/device/iq-stream` in code
comments) carrying a small fixed binary header (magic, sequence number,
center frequency, sample rate, payload length — see
`rtlsdr_iq_chunk_header_t`) followed by the raw IQ bytes, POSTed as
`application/octet-stream` with the same `Authorization: Bearer <device
token>` auth as the regular telemetry loop. **This endpoint does not
exist anywhere in this repo.** Building it is explicitly out of scope for
this workstream (it's backend work, not firmware, and the spec doesn't
assign a backend workstream to receive IQ data at all — only to receive
scalar telemetry). The stub is inert by default (`rtlsdr_exp_forward_
iq_block()` returns `ESP_OK` immediately unless `iq_upload_url` is
configured) specifically so this module can be compiled/enabled for its
USB-host/bring-up behavior without requiring a backend that doesn't
exist.
A real product decision here — genuinely open, not resolved by this
workstream — is whether a POST-per-chunk model is even right versus a
persistent WebSocket stream (the spec's `/ws/device-feed` design already
establishes a WS pub/sub pattern on the backend for telemetry; a
`/ws/device-iq` sibling might fit that architecture better than repeated
HTTP POSTs, especially if backpressure/flow-control matters, which for a
continuous stream it very much does). That's flagged here rather than
silently decided, because it depends on backend design judgment as much
as firmware judgment.
### What's unverified — an honest, specific list for real hardware bring-up
Nothing below has run against real hardware. In rough order of "most
likely to break first":
1. **USB Host Library API surface.** Function names, struct field names,
and callback signatures (`usb_host_client_config_t`'s `.async.
client_event_callback` shape in particular — ESP-IDF has changed this
API's shape across versions) are written from documented/remembered
API shape, not checked against a real ESP-IDF checkout (none available
in this environment). **First thing a real bring-up needs: does this
even compile against the ESP-IDF version Workstream I's project
targets?**
2. **RTL2832U enumeration over a real ESP32-P4 USB-OTG host port** — does
`usb_host_device_open()` / `usb_host_get_device_descriptor()` actually
see the dongle at all on this specific chip's USB-OTG controller (power
delivery to the dongle over USB-host mode is itself a hardware
question — does the ESP32-P4 dev board supply VBUS in host mode, does
the dongle draw more current than it can supply).
3. **The init vendor-command sequence itself** — carried over unchanged
from `sdr.ts`, which is *itself* unverified. Two layers of "reasoned,
not tested." A logic analyzer / USB protocol analyzer trace against a
real dongle (or cross-checking against real librtlsdr `-T` verbose
output) is needed to confirm register values, not just transfer
plumbing.
4. **R820T PLL frequency math and demod resample-ratio math** — both are
the same simplified integer-N approximation `sdr.ts` uses (its own
comment: "real librtlsdr computes the exact sdm/vco from a 28.8MHz
crystal reference. Simplified... Marked for hardware."). Likely wrong
or imprecise until replaced with the real librtlsdr formula and
checked against an actual received signal.
5. **Bulk transfer chunk size, pipeline depth, and timeout=0 choice**
(`RTLSDR_EXP_BULK_CHUNK_BYTES`/`RTLSDR_EXP_BULK_QUEUE_DEPTH` Kconfig,
defaults 16384B / depth 4) — these are guesses. Real ESP32-P4 USB
Host Library heap/DMA limits, achievable sustained throughput at
2.048 Msps (~4.1 MB/s), and whether `timeout_ms = 0` (no timeout, i.e.
"block until data or disconnect") is even the right transfer mode for
this endpoint all need real measurement.
6. **Drop-on-full backpressure policy** (`iq_blocks_dropped` stat) — is
silently dropping IQ blocks when the forward task falls behind
acceptable, or does it need real flow control (e.g. throttling the
bulk read rate itself)? Depends on (5) and on real WiFi uplink
bandwidth from a real device on a real seeker's home network.
7. **The proposed IQ-forwarding wire format and endpoint** — entirely
hypothetical (see architecture section above); no backend exists to
validate the framing against, and the POST-vs-WebSocket question above
is unresolved.
8. **Concurrent USB Host Library ownership with the rest of the firmware
project.** `rtlsdr_exp_start()`/`rtlsdr_exp_stop()` call `usb_host_
install()`/`usb_host_uninstall()` directly, assuming this module is the
*only* USB Host client in the project. If Workstream I's skeleton (or
anything else) also needs USB host for something, this needs to change
to a shared-ownership model (install once, both modules register as
clients) — impossible to resolve without seeing that code, flagged
here for whoever does the merge.
9. **Memory footprint.** Multiple in-flight 16KB bulk transfer buffers
plus a forward queue plus `esp_http_client` buffers, alongside whatever
Workstream I's WiFi/HTTP/BME280/presence stack already needs, on a
single ESP32-P4's RAM — not sized or measured against a real linker
map.
### Build / integration notes
This component is **off by default** (`RTLSDR_EXP_ENABLE` Kconfig option,
default `n`) so it cannot affect Workstream I's core build unless
explicitly turned on via `idf.py menuconfig` → "RTL-SDR Experimental
Module." To include it in a real project once Workstream I's skeleton
exists:
1. Add this directory's `components/` to the consuming project's
`EXTRA_COMPONENT_DIRS` in the top-level `CMakeLists.txt` (or copy
`components/rtlsdr_experimental/` into that project's own
`components/`).
2. From wherever `app_main()` sets up its other sensor drivers, e.g.:
```c
#include "rtlsdr_experimental.h"
rtlsdr_exp_config_t sdr_cfg;
rtlsdr_exp_config_default(&sdr_cfg);
sdr_cfg.iq_upload_url = NULL; /* leave unset until a real backend
endpoint exists — see README */
sdr_cfg.device_bearer_token = DEVICE_BEARER_TOKEN; /* from
main/device_config.h, same token
used for the telemetry POST loop */
rtlsdr_exp_handle_t sdr_handle;
if (rtlsdr_exp_init(&sdr_cfg, &sdr_handle) == ESP_OK) {
rtlsdr_exp_start(sdr_handle); /* non-blocking; watches for a dongle */
}
```
3. `idf.py build` — **not run in this environment** (no ESP-IDF
toolchain available); this module has only been reasoned about, not
compiled. Treat "compiles" as an open question for the next person
with a real toolchain, not a claim made here.
Verified in this environment: none of it, against hardware or a real
compiler. What *has* been done: careful structural translation of a
real, already-partially-researched protocol (`sdr.ts`) to the documented
shape of a real, chip-specific API (ESP32-P4's USB Host Library), with
every simplification and open question called out rather than hidden.