Snapshot: full project state

.case-verify/snippets/harvest3.json

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+{
+ "Littlefield_own": [],
+ "Littlefield_cited": [
+  {
+   "q": "\"Littlefield\" commingling tracing separate",
+   "err": "HTTP Error 429: Too Many Requests"
+  }
+ ],
+ "Kovacs_own": [
+  {
+   "q": "transmutation \"joint tenancy\"",
+   "err": "HTTP Error 429: Too Many Requests"
+  },
+  {
+   "q": "\"source of funds\" acquisition",
+   "err": "HTTP Error 429: Too Many Requests"
+  }
+ ],
+ "Kovacs_cited": [],
+ "Short_own": [],
+ "Short_cited": [
+  {
+   "q": "\"In re Marriage of Short\"",
+   "case": "State v. Coria",
+   "date": "2002-06-27",
+   "cit": [
+    "146 Wash. 2d 631",
+    "48 P.3d 980"
+   ],
+   "snip": "\nMadsen, J.\n(concurring) \u2014 While I agree with the majority that \u201cproperty of another\u201d includes the one-half interest of a spouse in community property, I write separately to make it clear that only the value of the victim\u2019s one-half interest in the community property may be considered when determining whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain a conviction for malicious mischief in the second degree.\nDiscu"
+  }
+ ],
+ "Elam_own": [],
+ "Konzen_own": [],
+ "Mueller_own": [
+  {
+   "q": "commingling \"reasonable certainty\"",
+   "err": "HTTP Error 429: Too Many Requests"
+  }
+ ],
+ "Glorfield_own": [
+  {
+   "q": "transmutation community intent",
+   "err": "HTTP Error 429: Too Many Requests"
+  }
+ ],
+ "PearsonM_own": [],
+ "Olivares_own": [],
+ "Sedlock_own": [],
+ "Hadley_cited": [
+  {
+   "q": "\"Hadley\" separate property division",
+   "case": "Williams v. City of Spokane",
+   "date": "2022-03-03",
+   "cit": [
+    "505 P.3d 91",
+    "199 Wash. 2d 236"
+   ],
+   "snip": "            FILE                                                                  THIS OPINION WAS FILED\n                                                                                 FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON\n       IN CLERK\u2019S OFFICE                                                               MARCH 3, 2022\nSUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON\n        MARCH 3, 2022\n                                                                                    ERIN L. LENNON\n                                 "
+  }
+ ],
+ "Kraft_cited": [
+  {
+   "q": "\"Kraft\" separate property \"economic circumstances\"",
+   "case": "Douglas Niemi, V. Mariah Niemi",
+   "date": "2021-10-04",
+   "cit": [],
+   "snip": "        IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON\n                            DIVISION ONE\n\nIn the Matter of the Marriage of                 )       No. 82549-6-I\nDOUGLAS NIEMI,                                   )\n                                                 )\n                            Appellant,           )\n                                                 )\n                   and                           )       PUBLISHED OPINION\n                                                 "
+  }
+ ],
+ "Berol_own": []
+}